Jump to content

Talk:Timmy Turner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Timmy's Wife

[edit]

There is no proof that Tootie marries Timmy, Tammy may look like Tootie but only because of what she wears. Just because they dress the same doesn't prove anything (hey, we don't see Timmy's Dad walking around in a pink shirt and hat and blue footy-pajama bottoms!) He could have married either Trixie or Tootie, because they're the only two girls Timmy's had any romantic relasionship with, whether he likes it or not.

There's also Cindy Vortex and Veronica (Trixie's friend), but we can eleminate them since Tammy has black hair and Cindy and Veronica are both blondes, and also Cindy lives in a parellel universe.

First of all this statment seems bias to me "He and his sister live in the same house as Timmy's Mother and Father with their married parents Timmy and his wife (who's name is never mentioned). However, Tootie might be Timmy's wife, since Tammy does resemble her, noting the glasses and black hair. But Trixie Tang, Timmy's life long crush also has black hair and slightly resembles Tammy." I am aware there are a a lot of people in real life who hate and despise Trixie, and are in denial that Timmy could have marry Trixie because of her social status. Trixie's dad wear's glasses also. Remember anything could happen within twenty years. I thought wikipedia article were suppose to have neutral point of view and talk about who Timmy could have married equally. And just because Veronica has blonde hair doesn't mean that she couldn't have married Timmy. Remember we never seen any of Veronica family members. Someone in her family could have black hair or wear glasses.63.3.11.130 19:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Excuse me why is no one responding to me. I had a enough of you people and your deep hatred for fictional character who are not even real bias ways. You cannot even talk about who Timmy Wife is in a neutral point of view. Don't make me edit the page myself and do some changes.63.3.11.2 00:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the relations section comepletely NPOV. If you have a suggestion for making it more NPOV, please say it here. Dylanlip (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Timmy's Birthday

[edit]

On the page, it has that he was born in 1992, but when the show began, he was 10. The first episode aired in 1998 as a part of Oh Yeah! Cartoons. He must have been born in 1988.

It actually seems kinda silly to even have a birthdate for a character that's always 10 years old. Shouldn't the stats give his age instead? CovenantD 05:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Possible trivia fact

[edit]

Apparently, there was one episode (called "Power Mad") where we find out Timmy goes to the bathroom at a certain time: 6: something PM (though that is just a one-episode thing). Should it be listed anyway? --Addict 2006 20:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure, if you figure out the time. I think it was 6:18, but I haven't seen it in a long time. --ASDFGHJKL 23:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Its Six eighhteen. Timmy ALWAYS goes to the bathroom at 6:18"said AJ. "oh, I thought it was like, 6:47-ish." says Chester. It could be her switches each day, or Chester was wrong. -ILuvCosmo 16:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...

[edit]

Why is Timmy in the "Christian Characters" list? Is his religon revealed in an episode? -Sumgirl —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.83.238.99 (talk) 15:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Excellent point. 141.150.23.110 00:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

blobs

[edit]

shouldn't we include something about the episode witgh the dentist and the blobs? The dentist was an unlisted characterBEATLES RULE!!! go fonz! 20:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC) timmy never have trixe [][reply]

Middle Name

[edit]
On the marathon that aired on 7 7 07 it is revealed that his middle name is something that begins with a T.Supah kid 15:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The marathon that aired on 7/7/07 revealed that Timmy's middle name is Tiberius.

I changed his middle back to tiberius because some stupid person put thomas as his middle name when that's not what it is65.173.90.94 00:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just changed it to Ticklish. I don't know why. 24.83.3.54 00:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bleh. I changed it back. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.83.3.54 (talk) 03:28, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

Main page deletion

[edit]

Why was this article deleted and merged?Schwarzlicht (talk) 03:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Massive Cleanup Results

[edit]

Well, here are the results for the massive cleanup I had undertaken. The article has gone down in size from 15,842 KB before the cleanup to 6609 KB after the cleanup. I've removed most, if not all of the POV, trivia, fancruft, and vandalised sections of the article. I've also added a section to add references once they are found. THis is definitely a big improvement, and shows that an article doesn't have to be deleted. This is a huge example. I'm probably going to get WikiProject Nickelodeon to re-asess the article, and I'll see what can be done to further improve the article after that. Dylanlip (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added back the navigation bar, which will help navigate people to related FOP articles. Dylanlip (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I found the last two sections that contain trivia/fan content. That is his older brother in wish generated relatives, and Timmy's character biography. Once those two are finished, I will officially bring this massive cleanup to a close. Dylanlip (talk) 19:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we are nearing the true end of my revamp of the article. I have finished adding brand new references, which use proper citations, and one of which is a third-party news report, which will surely help the article. I have two sections left to work on, which is Concept/Creation, and Reception. Once those two sections are done, this revamp will Fully come to a close. Dylanlip (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

[edit]

The "Reception" section is blank. Was the content removed and should it be restored or should the heading just be deleted? --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 22:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should this arcticle be kept?

[edit]

It got redirected earlier, and I want to know if this arcticle should be kept or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.237.146 (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]