User talk:Mikegr~enwiki

Heya; great idea with the Tube navigation boxes, but would it be possible to format them with the skin-format (change '{|' to '{| id="toc"')?
Thanks.
James F. (talk) 23:16, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The skin-formatting will make them look like other boxes in the skin; slowly, we're (slowly) changing all the tables to use it, and it helps if people start new ones with it too :-)

James F. (talk) 23:27, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I'm adding the colored borders to some of these, as you appear to have been doing too, as on Talk:London Underground. I've changed your align="center" lines to style="text-align: center;", as the aligns weren't working in Firefox (not sure why, as the code looked right). Could I also ask that you use the colors from the table on the London Underground article, please:

Bakerloo Line	`#ae6017`
Central Line	`#f15b2e`
Circle Line	`#ffe02b`
District Line	`#00a166`
East London Line	`#fbae34`
Hammersmith & City Line	`#f491a8`
Jubilee Line	`#949699`
Metropolitan Line	`#91005a`
Northern Line	`black`
Piccadilly Line	`#094fa3`
Victoria Line	`#0a9cda`
Waterloo & City Line	`#88d0c4`
Docklands Light Railway	`#00BBB4`

Thanks; and good work! :o) — OwenBlacker 20:05, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:GoldenNica CreativeCommons.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:GoldenNica CreativeCommons.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Image:LawrenceLessig.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:LawrenceLessig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mikegr! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 13 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Luc Courchesne - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luc Courchesne

A tag has been placed on Luc Courchesne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mikegr. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mikegr~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)