Jump to content

Talk:Anne Archer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pic is Missing

[edit]

The picture of Archer that is linked in the article is missing. Does anyone know what happened to it? Is someone planning to post it? The referenced image is "xxxxx.jpg" so I assume this is the case? —Frecklefoot 15:43, 14 Oct 2003 (UTC)

unnecessary pic

[edit]

What's up with the pic of Anne gagged? (not even tied, just gagged, for all we know). It does not show off acting ability or emotion, and seems to me like someone is just flaunting an "interest" of theirs. Call me cynical, but that's how I see it. I think it should be replaced with a more interesting picture that shows off a greater range of acting skills.

Another thing to note is that I looked in the "tv screenshots" area and noticed the same person who posted this pic of her also uploaded other pics of gagged (not necessarily tied) women. Methinks we have a "fetish flaunter" in our midst.

I vote for removal of the picture, and if possible, replacement with something else.

Birthday

[edit]

Was Anne born August 24/1947 or August 25/1947? Hotwine8 03:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CA Birth Index says Aug 24.--Fallout boy 23:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Archer, mother of Scientologist Tommy Davis (Scientologist) ...

[edit]

First husband incorrect? ...

[edit]


US Jiu Jitsu Open

[edit]

We say,

Anne made it to the finals on the US Jiu-Jitsu Open back in 1999 but was stopped by Kyra Gracie, who was just 16 years old, in the semi-final, with a chokehold.

According to our article on Kyra Gracie, she was born in May 1985, so she could not have been 16 years old in 1999. -- Jayen466 17:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Her official website, annearcher.com, does not mention anything of the sort; so it would seem that this may well have been a practical joke that remained undetected for some time. The info should not be reinserted unless reliably sourced. -- Jayen466 04:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There was a group of vandals editing several biographies inserting rubbish - often false information that the person practised judo and/or BJJ. I reverted all their edits. They were quite insidious because they did not look like the usual vandalism and remained undetected for quite some time. For example, have a look at this bio before and after I deleted all the incorrect information [1] --David Broadfoot (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artists for Human Rights

[edit]

Does anyone have any verifiable information about this organization? All of the individuals listed on the BOARD OF DIRECTORS appear to be Scientologists.[2] Is this another Scientology front group like ABLE? Austinmayor (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anne Archer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

“Blockbuster features”

[edit]

Followed by B movies. A bit disrespectful. 2601:2C4:C981:4600:750A:9DC2:7888:97E (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]