Talk:Cosmetic dentistry

request link inclusion

I added a link to www.cosmetic-dentistry-information.co.uk a comprehensive guide to all aspects of cosmetic dentistry. This site is supported by dental professionals from around the world. However, the link was removed albeit the content of the linked site is arguably of much higher quality than other sites linked here. There are some ads on the site but they are there to support bandwidth bills and general running of the site. There are also ads on other sites linked here so I'm not sure what the difference is? I would be grateful if you would consider adding the above mentioned site as its primary function is a high quality reference source. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.66.54 (talk) 15:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I removed some misleading information from this page, BIS GMA and other resins may well cause feminisation, but discussion as to detailed properties of these chemicals is best done on the related chemistry pages. I have added a few links also. Ashley Payne 12:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it best to eliminate the "safe and effective" phrase from the description of composite resin; the qualifier that it be used by a trained professional is superfluous, since this would apply to all the procedures, techniques, and materials used during dental service.--Mark Bornfeld DDS 16:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"voluntary work"? That seems odd--as though other forms of dental work like filling cavities and braces are mandated by government edict. Perhaps elective would be a better word?

Agreed - in the future, feel free to make a change like that right away - include explanations if necessary in the summary. :) Krupo 04:05, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)

Redirection unappropriate

Someone redirected "tooth bleaching" to this page. I somehow don't agree that is right. I think "tooth bleaching" is a subset of cosmetic dentistry and the redirection is therefore unappropriate.

This page was overloaded with what looked a lot like advertising copy. Clearly, there's more to be said on this subject, but it needs to be said within the bounds of the neutral point of view and whatever is said should be sourced to a reputable source (see this for ideas on what "reputable" means in this context). Clair de Lune 02:27, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to use good writing skills

I deleted the last edit (about bleaching) because of two things:

1. It's in the wrong section.

2. The sentences were poorly constructed -- lacks proper syntax, spelling, and grammar.

You're welcome to add to this article, but please put in a little effort when expressing your ideas.

--66.44.0.222 22:01, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Distinction between "cosmetic dentistry" and "esthetic dentistry" is arbitrary

...and does not reflect any recognized official definitions of the terms. Recommend deletion of the sentence stating as such in the first paragraph.--
Mark Bornfeld DDS
dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY 17:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

The inclusion of "Implants" in the section "Treatments" is inappropriate

...and it more properly merits listing under the specialties of Prosthodontics or Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. While implant service can certainly have esthetic consequences, the same can be said of any other dental service. The inclusion of extraneous services under this topic does nothing to clarify the definition of cosmetic dentistry. --
Mark Bornfeld DDS
dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY 17:32, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

I removed the listing of "Implants" in the "Treatments" section for the aforementioned reason.--Mark Bornfeld DDS 16:29, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I revised the definition of Cosmetic Dentistry

...to make it seem less like a promotional brochure such as one would find in a dentist's office. Cosmetic dentistry aims to revise appearance in smiling, but may also modify appearance while not smiling. Also, while I'm sure most patients wouldn't mind "brand new youthful look," or might even want to be restored to their "original appearance," this description doesn't necessarily encompass the scope or intent of cosmetic dentistry in its most formal sense. Also, the contrasting of cosmetic dentistry with more traditional restorative and prosthetic dentistry as being "elective" is an artificial distinction. One would question whether a maxillofacial prosthesis, which is primarily cosmetic in intent, is truly elective, while the salvaging of a single tooth is seldom a matter of life and death. I welcome comments, though... --
Mark Bornfeld DDS
dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY 20:07, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Another article on Bonding & Enamel Shaping

Either more information needs to be put up on both these areas, or a new article entirely. If possible, it'd be nice if there were pictures of these four options (maybe before & after images) instead of a brief explanation. I feel this way since cosmetic dentistry has become so popular these days; further explanation and demonstration would be appreciated. --71.194.128.49 12:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article reads like a brochure

Particularly the intro paragraphs. Where did that stuff come from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.88.243.42 (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Contouring" links to an article about farming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.136.184 (talk) 07:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

“Whitening” section is a advertisement

It’s literally looks like something you would see on a dentist office’s website, not like Wikipedia. Excessive use of “the doctor” and second person. Please fix. 100.36.232.242 (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Environmental physiology

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 5 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Madisonnew (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Madisonnew (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective and advertorial

Subjective claims are made such as that the procedures discussed 'improve' the appearance of teeth. In fact the artificial whiteness and unnatural symmetry are not universally considered improvements. To many, especially outside the US where cosmetic dentistry is a widespread and very lucrative business, the result dues not look natural and creates a sort of 'Barbie Doll' image which is not to everyone's liking.

Can we at least have recognition in the article that some, but not all, people consider such changes to be an improvement, otherwise the article appears to serve as an advertisement for US dentistry practices and does not represent a balanced, factual view. 86.191.214.39 (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]