1876 United States presidential election
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
369 members of the Electoral College 185 electoral votes needed to win | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turnout | 82.6%[1] 10.5 pp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Presidential election results map. Red denotes states won by Hayes/Wheeler, blue denotes those won by Tilden/Hendricks. Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Presidential elections were held in the United States on November 7, 1876. Republican Governor Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio very narrowly defeated Democrat Governor Samuel J. Tilden of New York. Following President Ulysses S. Grant's decision to retire after his second term, U.S. Representative James G. Blaine emerged as frontrunner for the Republican nomination; however, Blaine was unable to win a majority at the 1876 Republican National Convention, which settled on Hayes as a compromise candidate. The 1876 Democratic National Convention nominated Tilden on the second ballot.
The election was among the most contentious in American history, and was only resolved by the Compromise of 1877, where Hayes agreed to end Reconstruction in exchange for recognition of his presidency. On March 2, 1877, the House and Senate confirmed Hayes as president. Tilden won 184 electoral votes to Hayes's 165 in the first count, with the 20 votes from Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon disputed. To address this constitutional crisis, Congress established the Electoral Commission, which awarded all twenty votes and thus the presidency to Hayes in a strict partyline vote. Some Democratic representatives filibustered the commission's decision, hoping to prevent Hayes's inauguration; their filibuster was ultimately ended by party leader Samuel J. Randall.
It was the second of five U.S. presidential elections in which the winner did not win a plurality of the national popular vote, after the 1824 election. Although Tilden defeated Hayes in the official popular vote tally, the election involved substantial electoral fraud, voter intimidation by paramilitary groups like the Red Shirts, and disenfranchisement of black Republicans. The election had the highest voter turnout of the eligible voting-age population in American history, at 82.6%.[2][3] Tilden's 50.9% is the largest share of the popular vote received by a candidate who was not elected to the presidency, and was the only presidential election in U.S. history in which the losing candidate won a majority of the popular vote. Tilden was also the last person to win a majority of the popular vote until William McKinley in 1896. As of 2024, this marks the only presidential election in which both candidates were sitting governors.
Nominations
[edit]Republican Party nomination
[edit]1876 Republican Party ticket | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rutherford B. Hayes | William A. Wheeler | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
for President | for Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29th & 32nd Governor of Ohio (1868–1872 & 1876–1877) |
U.S. Representative for New York's 19th (1861–1863 & 1869–1877) |
-
Senator Oliver P. Morton from Indiana
-
Senator Roscoe Conkling from New York
It was widely assumed during the year 1875 that incumbent President Ulysses S. Grant would run for a third term as president despite the poor economic conditions, the numerous political scandals that had developed since he assumed office in 1869, and despite a longstanding tradition set by George Washington not to stay in office for more than two terms. Grant's inner circle advised him to go for a third term and he almost did so, but on December 15, 1875, the House, by a sweeping 233–18 vote, passed a resolution declaring that the two-term tradition was to prevent a dictatorship.[6] Later that year, Grant ruled himself out of running in 1876. He instead tried to persuade Secretary of State Hamilton Fish to run for the presidency, but the 67-year-old Fish declined since he believed himself too old for that role. Grant nonetheless sent a letter to the convention imploring them to nominate Fish, but the letter was misplaced and never read to the convention. Fish later confirmed that he would have declined the presidential nomination even if it had been offered to him.
When the Sixth Republican National Convention assembled in Cincinnati, Ohio, on June 14, 1876, James G. Blaine appeared to be the presidential nominee. On the first ballot, Blaine was just 100 votes short of a majority. His vote began to slide after the second ballot, however, as many Republicans feared that Blaine could not win the general election. Anti-Blaine delegates could not agree on a candidate until his total rose to 41% on the sixth ballot. Leaders of the reform Republicans met privately and considered alternatives. They chose the reforming Ohio Governor Rutherford B. Hayes, who had been gradually building support during the convention until he finished second on the sixth ballot. On the seventh ballot, Hayes was nominated for president with 384 votes, compared to 351 for Blaine and 21 for Benjamin Bristow. New York Representative William A. Wheeler was nominated for vice president by a much larger margin (366–89) over his chief rival, Frederick Theodore Frelinghuysen, who later served as a member of the Electoral Commission, which awarded the election to Hayes.
Presidential Ballot | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballot | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th |
Hayes | 61 | 64 | 67 | 68 | 104 | 113 | 384 |
Blaine | 285 | 296 | 293 | 292 | 286 | 308 | 351 |
Bristow | 113 | 114 | 121 | 126 | 114 | 111 | 21 |
Morton | 124 | 120 | 113 | 108 | 95 | 85 | 0 |
Conkling | 99 | 93 | 90 | 84 | 82 | 81 | 0 |
Hartranft | 58 | 63 | 68 | 71 | 69 | 50 | 0 |
Jewell | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Washburne | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
Wheeler | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Not Voting | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Vice Presidential Ballot[7] | |
---|---|
Ballot | 1st (Partial Roll-Call) |
Wheeler | 366 |
Frelinghuysen | 89 |
Jewell | 86 |
Woodford | 70 |
Hawley | 25 |
Not Called | 120 |
Democratic Party nomination
[edit]1876 Democratic Party ticket | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samuel J. Tilden | Thomas A. Hendricks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
for President | for Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25th Governor of New York (1875–1876) |
16th Governor of Indiana (1873–1877) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Campaign |
Democratic candidates:
- Samuel J. Tilden, governor of New York
- Thomas A. Hendricks, governor of Indiana
- Winfield Scott Hancock, United States Army major general from Pennsylvania
- William Allen, former governor of Ohio
- Thomas F. Bayard, U.S. senator from Delaware
- Joel Parker, former governor of New Jersey
-
William Allen from Ohio
-
Joel Parker from New Jersey
The Democratic Party's failure to nominate its own ticket in the previous presidential election, in which they had instead endorsed the Liberal Republican candidacy of Horace Greeley, had resulted in much debate about the party's viability. Any doubts about the party's future were dispelled firstly by the collapse of the Liberal Republicans in the aftermath of that election, and secondly by significant Democratic gains in the 1874 mid-term elections, which saw them take control of the House of Representatives for the first time in sixteen years.
The 12th Democratic National Convention assembled in St. Louis, Missouri, in June 1876, which was the first political convention ever held by one of the major American parties west of the Mississippi River. There were 5000 people jammed inside the auditorium in St. Louis amid hopes for the Democratic Party's first presidential victory in 20 years. The platform called for immediate and sweeping reforms in response to the scandals that had plagued the Grant administration. Tilden won more than 400 votes on the first ballot and the presidential nomination by a landslide on the second.
Tilden defeated Thomas A. Hendricks, Winfield Scott Hancock, William Allen, Thomas F. Bayard, and Joel Parker for the presidential nomination. Tilden overcame strong opposition from "Honest John" Kelly, the leader of New York's Tammany Hall, to obtain the presidential nomination. Thomas Hendricks was nominated for vice president since he was the only person to put forward for that position.
The Democratic platform pledged to replace the corruption of the Grant administration with honest, efficient government and to end "the rapacity of carpetbag tyrannies" in the South. It also called for treaty protection for naturalized United States citizens visiting their homelands, restrictions on Asian immigration, tariff reform, and opposition to land grants for railroads.[8] It has been claimed that the voting Democrats received Tilden's presidential nomination with more enthusiasm than any leader since Andrew Jackson.[9]
Presidential Ballot[10] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st (Before Shifts) | 1st (After Shifts) | 2nd (Before Shifts) | 2nd (After Shifts) | Unanimous | |
Tilden | 403.5 | 410.5 | 508 | 534 | 738 |
Hendricks | 133.5 | 140.5 | 85 | 60 | 0 |
Hancock | 77 | 77 | 60 | 59 | 0 |
Allen | 56 | 56 | 54 | 54 | 0 |
Bayard | 31 | 31 | 11 | 11 | 0 |
Broadhead | 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Parker | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 |
Thurman | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Source: Official proceedings of the National Democratic convention, held in St. Louis, Mo., June 27th, 28th and 29th, 1876. (September 3, 2012).
Source: Official proceedings of the National Democratic convention, held in St. Louis, Mo., June 27th, 28th and 29th, 1876. (September 3, 2012).
Vice Presidential Ballot | |
1st | |
---|---|
Thomas A. Hendricks | 730 |
Blank | 8 |
Source: Official proceedings of the National Democratic convention, held in St. Louis, Mo., June 27th, 28th and 29th, 1876 (September 3, 2012).
Greenback Party nomination
[edit]Greenback candidates:
- Peter Cooper, U.S. philanthropist from New York
- Andrew Curtin, former governor of Pennsylvania
- William Allen, former governor of Ohio
- Alexander Campbell, U.S. representative from Illinois
Candidates gallery
[edit]-
William Allen from Ohio
The Greenback Party had been organized by agricultural interests in Indianapolis, Indiana, in 1874 to urge the federal government to inflate the economy through the mass issuance of paper money called greenbacks. Its first national nominating convention was held in Indianapolis in the spring of 1876. Peter Cooper was nominated for president with 352 votes to 119 for three other contenders. The convention nominated Anti-Monopolist Senator Newton Booth of California for vice president. After Booth declined to run, the national committee chose Samuel Fenton Cary as his replacement on the ticket.[11][12]
Prohibition Party nomination
[edit]The Prohibition Party, in its second national convention in Cleveland, nominated Green Clay Smith as its presidential candidate and Gideon T. Stewart as its vice presidential candidate.
American National Party nomination
[edit]This small political party used several different names, often with different names in different states. It was a continuation of the Anti-Masonic Party that met in 1872 and nominated Charles Francis Adams, Sr., for president. When Adams declined to run, the party did not contest the 1872 election.
The convention was held from June 8 to 10, 1875 in Liberty Hall, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. B.T. Roberts of New York served as chairman, and Jonathan Blanchard was the keynote speaker.
The platform supported the Reconstruction Amendments to the Constitution, international arbitration, the reading of the scriptures in public schools, specie payments, justice for Native Americans, abolition of the Electoral College, and prohibition of the sale of alcoholic beverages. It declared the first day of the week to be a day of rest for the United States. The platform opposed secret societies and monopolies.
The convention considered three potential presidential candidates: Charles F. Adams, Jonathan Blanchard, and James B. Walker. When Blanchard declined to run, Walker was unanimously nominated for president. The convention then nominated Donald Kirkpatrick of New York unanimously for vice president.[13][14]
General election
[edit]Campaign
[edit]Tilden, who had prosecuted machine politicians in New York and sent the political boss William M. Tweed to jail, ran as a reform candidate against the background of the corruption of the Grant administration. Both parties backed civil service reform. Both sides mounted mudslinging campaigns, with Democratic attacks on Republican corruption being countered by Republicans raising the Civil War issue, a tactic that was ridiculed by Democrats, who called it "waving the bloody shirt." Republicans chanted, "Not every Democrat was a rebel, but every rebel was a Democrat."
Hayes was a virtual unknown outside his home state of Ohio, where he had served two terms as a US Representative and then two terms as governor. Henry Adams called Hayes "a third-rate nonentity whose only recommendations are that he is obnoxious to no one". Hayes had served in the Civil War with distinction as colonel of the 23rd Ohio Regiment and was wounded several times, which made him marketable to veterans. He had later been brevetted as a major-general. His most important asset was his help to the Republican ticket in carrying Ohio, a crucial swing state. On the other side, the newspaperman John D. Defrees described Tilden as "a very nice, prim, little, withered-up, fidgety old bachelor, about one-hundred and twenty-pounds avoirdupois, who never had a genuine impulse for many nor any affection for woman".[15]
The Democratic strategy for victory in the South relied on paramilitary groups such as the Red Shirts and the White League. These groups saw themselves as the military wing of the Democrats. Using the strategy of the Mississippi Plan, they actively suppressed both black and white Republican voting. They violently disrupted meetings and rallies, attacked party organizers, and threatened potential voters with retaliation for voting Republican.[16][17]
Because it was considered improper for a candidate to pursue the presidency actively, neither Tilden nor Hayes appeared publicly during the campaign. Speaking and leading rallies were left to their surrogates.
Colorado
[edit]Colorado was admitted to the Union as the 38th state on August 1, 1876; this was the first presidential election in which the state sent electors. There was insufficient time or money to organize a presidential election in the new state. Therefore, Colorado's state legislature selected the state's three Electoral College electors. The Republican Party held a slim majority in the state legislature following a closely contested election on October 3, 1876. Many of the seats in that election had been decided by only a few hundred votes.[18] On November 7, 1876, in a 50 to 24 vote, the state legislature chose Otto Mears, William Hadley, and Herman Beckurts to serve as the state's electors for president. All three of the state electors cast their votes for Hayes.[19][20] This was the last election in which any state chose electors through its state legislature, rather than by popular vote.[21]
Electoral disputes and Compromise of 1877
[edit]Florida (with 4 electoral votes) and Louisiana (with 8) reported returns that favored Tilden, while Hayes led in South Carolina (with 7). However, the elections in each state were marked by electoral fraud and threats of violence against Republican voters. The most extreme case was in South Carolina, where an impossible 101 percent of all eligible voters in the state had their votes counted,[22] and an estimated 150 Black Republicans were murdered.[23] One of the points of contention revolved around the design of ballots. At the time, parties would print ballots or "tickets" to enable voters to support them in the open ballots. To aid illiterate voters, the parties would print symbols on the tickets, and in this election, many Democratic ballots were printed with the Republican symbol of Abraham Lincoln on them.[24] The Republican-dominated state electoral commissions subsequently rejected enough Democratic votes to award their electoral votes to Hayes.
In two Southern states, the governor recognized by the United States had signed the Republican certificates; the Democratic certificates from Florida were signed by the state attorney-general and the newly elected Democratic governor. Those from Louisiana were signed by the Democratic gubernatorial candidate and those from South Carolina by no state official. The Tilden electors in South Carolina claimed that they had been chosen by the popular vote although they were rejected by the state election board.[25]
Meanwhile, in Oregon, the vote of a single elector was disputed. The statewide result clearly favored Hayes, but the state's Democratic governor, La Fayette Grover, claimed that one of the Republican electors, Ex-Postmaster John Watts, was ineligible under Article II, Section 1, of the United States Constitution since he had been a "person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States." Grover substituted a Democratic elector in Watts's place.
The two Republican electors dismissed Grover's action and reported three votes for Hayes. However, the Democratic elector, C. A. Cronin, reported one vote for Tilden and two votes for Hayes. The two Republican electors presented a certificate signed by the secretary of state of Oregon, and Cronin and the two electors whom he appointed (Cronin voted for Tilden while his associates voted for Hayes) presented a certificate signed by the governor and attested by the secretary of state.[25]
Ultimately, all three of Oregon's votes were awarded to Hayes, who had a majority of one in the Electoral College. The Democrats claimed fraud, and suppressed excitement pervaded the country. Threats were even muttered that Hayes would never be inaugurated. In Columbus, Ohio, a shot was fired at Hayes's residence as he sat down to dinner. After supporters marched to his home to call for the President, Hayes urged the crowd that "it is impossible, at so early a time, to obtain the result".[26] Grant quietly strengthened the military force in and around Washington.[25]
The Constitution provides that "the President of the Senate shall, in presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the [electoral] certificates, and the votes shall then be counted." The Republicans held that the power to count the votes lay with the President of the Senate, with the House and Senate being mere spectators. The Democrats objected to that construction, since the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Republican Thomas W. Ferry, could then count the votes of the disputed states for Hayes.
The Democrats insisted that Congress should continue the practice followed since 1865: no vote objected to should be counted except by the concurrence of both houses. Since the House had a solid Democratic majority, rejecting the vote of one state, therefore, would elect Tilden.[25]
Facing an unprecedented constitutional crisis, the Congress passed a law on January 29, 1877, to form a 15-member Electoral Commission, which would settle the result. Five members were selected from each house of Congress, and they were joined by five members of the United States Supreme Court, with William M. Evarts serving as counsel for the Republican Party. The majority party in each house named three members and the minority party two members. As the Republicans controlled the Senate and the Democrats controlled the House of Representatives, that yielded five Democratic and five Republican members of the commission. Of the Supreme Court justices, two Republicans and two Democrats were chosen, with the fifth to be selected by those four.
The justices first selected the independent Justice David Davis. According to one historian, "No one, perhaps not even Davis himself, knew which presidential candidate he preferred."[26] Just as the Electoral Commission Bill was passing Congress, the Illinois Legislature elected Davis to the Senate, and Democrats in the legislature believed that they had purchased Davis's support by voting for him. However, they had miscalculated, as Davis promptly excused himself from the commission and resigned as a Justice to take his Senate seat.[27] As all of the remaining available Justices were Republicans, Republican Justice Joseph P. Bradley, who was considered the most impartial remaining member of the court was selected. That selection proved decisive.
Since it was drawing perilously near to Inauguration Day, the commission met on January 31. Each of the disputed state election cases (Florida, Louisiana, Oregon, and South Carolina) was respectively submitted to the commission by Congress. Eminent counsel appeared for each side, and there were double sets of returns from every one of the states named.[25]
The commission first decided not to question any returns that were prima facie lawful.[25] Bradley then joined the other seven Republican committee members in a series of 8–7 votes that gave all 20 disputed electoral votes to Hayes, which gave Hayes a 185–184 electoral vote victory. The commission adjourned on March 2. Hayes privately took the oath of office the next day and was publicly sworn into office on March 5, 1877, and Hayes was inaugurated without disturbance.[25]
The Compromise of 1877 might be a reason for the Democrats accepting the Electoral Commission. During intense closed-door meetings, Democratic leaders agreed reluctantly to accept Hayes as president in return for the withdrawal of federal troops from the last two Southern states that were still occupied: South Carolina and Louisiana. Republican leaders in return agreed on a number of handouts and entitlements, including federal subsidies for a transcontinental railroad line through the South. Although some of the promises were not kept, particularly the railroad proposal, that was enough for the time being to avert a dangerous standoff.
The returns accepted by the Commission put Hayes's margin of victory in South Carolina at 889 votes, the second-closest popular vote margin in a decisive state in U.S. history, after the election of 2000, which was decided by 537 votes in Florida. In 2000, the margin of victory in the Electoral College for George W. Bush was five votes, as opposed to Hayes' one vote.
Upon his defeat, Tilden said, "I can retire to public life with the consciousness that I shall receive from posterity the credit of having been elected to the highest position in the gift of the people, without any of the cares and responsibilities of the office."
Congress would eventually enact the Electoral Count Act in 1887 to provide more detailed rules for the counting of electoral votes, especially in cases of multiple slates of electors being received from a single state.
Results
[edit]37.1% of the voting age population and 82.6% of eligible voters participated in the election.[28] According to the commission's rulings, of the 2,249 counties and independent cities making returns, Tilden won in 1,301 (57.9%), and Hayes carried only 947 (42.1%). One county (<0.1%) in Nevada split evenly between Tilden and Hayes.
The Greenback ticket did not have a major impact on the election's outcome by attracting slightly under one percent of the popular vote; nonetheless, Cooper had the strongest performance of any third-party presidential candidate since John Bell in 1860. The Greenbacks' best showings were in Kansas, where Cooper earned just over six percent of the vote, and in Indiana, where he earned 17,207 votes, which far exceeded Tilden's margin of victory of roughly 5,500 votes over Hayes in that state.
The election of 1876 was the last one held before the end of the Reconstruction era, which sought to protect the rights of African Americans in the South, who usually voted for Republican presidential candidates. No antebellum slave state would be carried by a Republican again until the 1896 realignment, which saw William McKinley carry Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, and Kentucky. This is the closest electoral college result in American history, and the second-closest victory in the tipping point state with South Carolina being decided by 889 votes (only the 2000 election in Florida was closer).
No Republican presidential candidate until Warren G. Harding in 1920 would carry any states that seceded and joined the Confederacy. That year, he carried Tennessee, which had never experienced a long period of occupation by federal troops and had been completely "reconstructed" well before the first presidential election of the Reconstruction period (1868). None of the Southern states that experienced long periods of occupation by federal troops was carried by a Republican again until Herbert Hoover in 1928, when he won Texas, Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia, and that proved the last election in which the Republican candidate won Louisiana until 1956, when it was carried by Dwight D. Eisenhower, and the last in which the Republican candidate won South Carolina until 1964, when Barry Goldwater did. The next time those two states voted against the Democrats was their support of the "Dixiecrat" candidate Strom Thurmond in 1948.
18.33% of Hayes' votes came from the eleven states of the former Confederacy, with him taking 40.40% of the vote in that region.[29] Although 1876 marked the last competitive two-party election in the South before the Democratic dominance of the South until 1948 and of the Border States until 1896, it was also the last presidential election (as of 2020) in which the Democrats won the wartime Unionist Mitchell County, North Carolina;[30] Wayne County, Tennessee; Henderson County, Tennessee; and Lewis County, Kentucky.[31] Hayes was also the only Republican president ever to be elected who failed to carry Indiana, and the first to win without New York and Connecticut.
Presidential candidate | Party | Home state | Popular vote[32] | Electoral vote[33] |
Running mate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count | Percentage | Vice-presidential candidate | Home state | Electoral vote[33] | ||||
Rutherford B. Hayes | Republican | Ohio | 4,034,142 | 47.92% | 185 | William A. Wheeler | New York | 185 |
Samuel J. Tilden | Democratic | New York | 4,286,808 | 50.92% | 184 | Thomas A. Hendricks | Indiana | 184 |
Peter Cooper | Greenback | New York | 83,726 | 0.99% | 0 | Samuel Fenton Cary | Ohio | 0 |
Green Clay Smith | Prohibition | Washington, D.C. | 6,945 | 0.08% | 0 | Gideon T. Stewart | Ohio | 0 |
James Walker | American National Party | Illinois | 463 | 0.01% | 0 | Donald Kirkpatrick | New York | 0 |
Other | 6,575 | 0.08% | — | Other | — | |||
Total | 8,418,659 | 100% | 369 | 369 | ||||
Needed to win | 185 | 185 |
Geography of results
[edit]-
Results by county, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote
Cartographic gallery
[edit]-
Map of presidential election results by county
-
Map of Democratic presidential election results by county
-
Map of Republican presidential election results by county
-
Map of "other" presidential election results by county
-
Cartogram of presidential election results by county
-
Cartogram of Democratic presidential election results by county
-
Cartogram of Republican presidential election results by county
-
Cartogram of "other" presidential election results by county
Results by state
[edit]Source: Data from Walter Dean Burnham, Presidential ballots, 1836–1892 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955) pp 247–57.[34]
States/districts won by Tilden/Hendricks |
States/districts won by Hayes/Wheeler |
Samuel J. Tilden Democratic |
Rutherford B. Hayes Republican |
Peter Cooper Greenback |
Green Smith Prohibition |
Margin | State Total | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | % | electoral votes |
# | % | total votes cast |
% | |
Alabama | 10 | 102,989 | 59.98 | 10 | 68,708 | 40.02 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −34,281 | −19.97 | 171,699 | 2.04% | AL |
Arkansas | 6 | 58,086 | 59.92 | 6 | 38,649 | 39.87 | – | 211 | 0.22 | – | – | – | – | −19,437 | −20.05 | 96,946 | 1.15% | AR |
California | 6 | 75,845 | 49.08 | – | 78,614 | 50.87 | 6 | 47 | 0.03 | – | – | – | – | 2,769 | 1.79 | 154,544 | 1.85% | CA |
Colorado* | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | - | CO |
Connecticut | 6 | 61,927 | 50.70 | 6 | 59,033 | 48.33 | – | 774 | 0.63 | – | 374 | 0.31 | – | −2,894 | −2.37 | 122,134 | 1.45% | CT |
Delaware | 3 | 13,381 | 55.45 | 3 | 10,752 | 44.55 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −2,629 | −10.89 | 24,133 | 0.29% | DE |
Florida | 4 | 22,927 | 49.01 | – | 23,849 | 50.99 | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 922 | 1.97 | 46,776 | 0.56% | FL |
Georgia | 11 | 130,157 | 72.03 | 11 | 50,533 | 27.97 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −79,624 | −44.07 | 180,690 | 2.15% | GA |
Illinois | 21 | 258,611 | 46.66 | – | 278,232 | 50.20 | 21 | 17,207 | 3.10 | – | – | – | – | 19,621 | 3.54 | 554,227 | 6.58% | IL |
Indiana | 15 | 213,526 | 48.65 | 15 | 208,011 | 47.39 | – | 17,233 | 3.93 | – | 141 | 0.03 | – | −5,515 | −1.26 | 438,911 | 5.21% | IN |
Iowa | 11 | 112,121 | 38.28 | – | 171,326 | 58.50 | 11 | 9,431 | 3.22 | – | – | – | – | 59,205 | 20.21 | 292,878 | 3.48% | IA |
Kansas | 5 | 37,902 | 30.53 | – | 78,324 | 63.10 | 5 | 7,770 | 6.26 | – | 110 | 0.09 | – | 40,422 | 32.56 | 124,134 | 1.47% | KS |
Kentucky | 12 | 160,060 | 61.41 | 12 | 97,568 | 37.44 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −62,492 | −23.98 | 260,626 | 3.10% | KY |
Louisiana | 8 | 70,508 | 48.35 | – | 75,315 | 51.65 | 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4,807 | 3.30 | 145,823 | 1.73% | LA |
Maine | 7 | 49,917 | 42.65 | – | 66,300 | 56.64 | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 16,383 | 14.00 | 117,045 | 1.39% | ME |
Maryland | 8 | 91,779 | 56.05 | 8 | 71,980 | 43.95 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −19,799 | −12.09 | 163,759 | 1.95% | MD |
Massachusetts | 13 | 108,777 | 41.90 | – | 150,064 | 57.80 | 13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 41,287 | 15.90 | 259,620 | 3.08% | MA |
Michigan | 11 | 141,685 | 44.49 | – | 166,901 | 52.41 | 11 | 9,023 | 2.83 | – | 766 | 0.24 | – | 25,216 | 7.92 | 318,450 | 3.78% | MI |
Minnesota | 5 | 48,587 | 39.16 | – | 72,955 | 58.80 | 5 | 2,389 | 1.93 | – | 144 | 0.12 | – | 24,368 | 19.64 | 124,075 | 1.47% | MN |
Mississippi | 8 | 112,173 | 68.08 | 8 | 52,603 | 31.92 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −59,570 | −36.15 | 164,776 | 1.96% | MS |
Missouri | 15 | 202,086 | 57.64 | 15 | 145,027 | 41.36 | – | 3,497 | 1.00 | – | – | – | – | −57,059 | −16.27 | 350,610 | 4.16% | MO |
Nebraska | 3 | 17,413 | 35.30 | – | 31,915 | 64.70 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,502 | 29.40 | 49,328 | 0.59% | NE |
Nevada | 3 | 9,308 | 47.27 | – | 10,383 | 52.73 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1,075 | 5.46 | 19,691 | 0.23% | NV |
New Hampshire | 5 | 38,510 | 48.05 | – | 41,540 | 51.83 | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3,030 | 3.78 | 80,141 | 0.95% | NH |
New Jersey | 9 | 115,962 | 52.66 | 9 | 103,517 | 47.01 | – | 714 | 0.32 | – | – | – | – | −12,445 | −5.65 | 220,193 | 2.62% | NJ |
New York | 35 | 521,949 | 51.40 | 35 | 489,207 | 48.17 | – | 1,978 | 0.19 | – | 2,369 | 0.23 | – | −32,742 | −3.22 | 1,015,503 | 12.06% | NY |
North Carolina | 10 | 125,427 | 53.62 | 10 | 108,484 | 46.38 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −16,943 | −7.24 | 233,911 | 2.78% | NC |
Ohio | 22 | 323,182 | 49.07 | – | 330,698 | 50.21 | 22 | 3,057 | 0.46 | – | 1,636 | 0.25 | – | 7,516 | 1.14 | 658,649 | 7.82% | OH |
Oregon | 3 | 14,157 | 47.38 | – | 15,214 | 50.92 | 3 | 510 | 1.71 | – | – | – | – | 1,057 | 3.54 | 29,881 | 0.35% | OR |
Pennsylvania | 29 | 366,204 | 48.25 | – | 384,184 | 50.62 | 29 | 7,204 | 0.95 | – | 1,318 | 0.17 | – | 17,980 | 2.37 | 758,993 | 9.02% | PA |
Rhode Island | 4 | 10,712 | 40.23 | – | 15,787 | 59.29 | 4 | 68 | 0.26 | – | 60 | 0.23 | – | 5,075 | 19.06 | 26,627 | 0.32% | RI |
South Carolina | 7 | 90,897 | 49.76 | – | 91,786 | 50.24 | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 889 | 0.49 | 182,683 | 2.17% | SC |
Tennessee | 12 | 133,177 | 59.79 | 12 | 89,566 | 40.21 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −43,611 | −19.58 | 222,743 | 2.65% | TN |
Texas | 8 | 104,755 | 70.04 | 8 | 44,800 | 29.96 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −59,955 | −40.09 | 149,555 | 1.78% | TX |
Vermont | 5 | 20,254 | 31.38 | – | 44,091 | 68.30 | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 23,837 | 36.93 | 64,553 | 0.77% | VT |
Virginia | 11 | 140,770 | 59.58 | 11 | 95,518 | 40.42 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −45,252 | −19.15 | 236,288 | 2.81% | VA |
West Virginia | 5 | 56,546 | 56.75 | 5 | 41,997 | 42.15 | – | 1,104 | 1.11 | – | – | – | – | −14,549 | −14.60 | 99,647 | 1.18% | WV |
Wisconsin | 10 | 123,926 | 48.19 | – | 130,067 | 50.57 | 10 | 1,509 | 0.59 | – | 27 | 0.01 | – | 6,141 | 2.39 | 257,177 | 3.05% | WI |
TOTALS: | 369 | 4,286,808 | 50.92 | 184 | 4,034,142 | 47.92 | 185 | 83,726 | 0.99 | – | 6,945 | 0.08 | – | -252,666 | -3.00 | 8,418,659 | 100% | US |
States that flipped from Republican to Democratic
[edit]- Alabama
- Arkansas
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Indiana
- Mississippi
- New Jersey
- New York
- North Carolina
- Virginia
- West Virginia
Close states
[edit]Margin of victory less than 1% (7 electoral votes):
- South Carolina, 0.5% (889 votes) (tipping point state)
Margin of victory less between 1% and 5% (164 electoral votes):
- Ohio, 1.1% (7,516 votes)
- Indiana, 1.3% (5,515 votes)
- California, 1.8% (2,798 votes)
- Florida, 2.0% (922 votes)
- Pennsylvania, 2.4% (17,980 votes)
- Connecticut, 2.4% (2,894 votes)
- Wisconsin, 2.4% (6,141 votes)
- New York, 3.2% (32,742 votes)
- Louisiana, 3.3% (4,807 votes)
- Oregon, 3.5% (1,057 votes)
- Illinois, 3.5% (19,621 votes)
- New Hampshire, 3.8% (3,030 votes)
Margin of victory between 5% and 10% (33 electoral votes):
- Nevada, 5.5% (1,075 votes)
- New Jersey, 5.7% (12,445 votes)
- North Carolina, 7.2% (16,943 votes)
- Michigan, 7.9% (25,216 votes)
Cultural references
[edit]- The presidential election of 1876 is a major theme of Gore Vidal's novel 1876.
See also
[edit]- American election campaigns in the 19th century
- History of the United States (1865–1918)
- Inauguration of Rutherford B. Hayes
- 1876–77 United States House of Representatives elections
- 1876–77 United States Senate elections
- Third Party System
- Contested elections in American history
References
[edit]- ^ "National General Election VEP Turnout Rates, 1789–Present". United States Election Project. CQ Press.
- ^ Between 1828–1928: "Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections: 1828–2008". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved November 9, 2012.
- ^ Between 1932 and 2008: "Table 397. Participation in Elections for President and U.S. Representatives: 1932 to 2010" (PDF). U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012. U.S. Census Bureau. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 24, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2013.
- ^ Presidential election of 1876
- ^ "Was Grant a candidate?". Archived from the original on February 10, 2018. Retrieved June 30, 2014.
- ^ "The Twice and Future President: Constitutional Interstices and the Twenty-Second Amendment" (PDF). University of Minnesota Law School. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 7, 2021.
- ^ Republican party. National convention. 6th, Cincinnati; Clancy, A. M.; Nelson, William (April 10, 1876). "Proceedings of the Republican national convention, held at Cincinnati, Ohio ... June 14, 15, and 16, 1876..." Concord, N.H., Republic Press Association. Retrieved April 10, 2018 – via Internet Archive.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ DeGregorio, William (1997). The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents. New York: Gramercy. ISBN 0-517-18353-6.
- ^ They Also Ran
- ^ Cook, Theodore Pease (1876). The Life and Public Services of Hon. Samuel J. Tilden. New York: D. Appleton and Company. p. 327 – via Google Books.
- ^ Smith, Joseph Patterson (1898). History of the Republican Party in Ohio. Vol. I. Chicago: The Lewis Publishing Company. p. 352. Retrieved May 19, 2018.
- ^ Unger, Irwin (1964). "The Election of 1876". The Greenback Era. Princeton University Press. pp. 307–308. ISBN 978-0691045177. JSTOR j.ctt183pq6r.12.
- ^ Havel, James T. (1996). U.S. Presidential Elections and the Candidates: A Biographical and Historical Guide. Vol. 2: The Elections, 1789–1992. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 47–48. ISBN 0-02-864623-1.
- ^ Hinshaw, Seth (2000). Ohio Elects the President: Our State's Role in Presidential Elections 1804–1996. Mansfield: Book Masters, Inc. p. 50.
- ^ Holt, Michael F., By One Vote, University Press of Kansas, 2008, p. 129
- ^ The violent origin of the term bulldoze as a means of intimidation came from this election. To "bulldose" or "bulldoze" meant to intimidate by violent means, sometimes by whipping or flogging. Bulldozing was used by some groups of Republicans and Democrats around the country to intimidate political opponents and to intimidate blacks in the South, particularly in Louisiana.
- ^ Kelly, John. "What in the Word?! The racist roots of 'bulldozer'". Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on March 1, 2018. Retrieved October 21, 2018.
- ^ Smiley, Jerome Constant (1913). Semi-centennial History of the State of Colorado Volume 1. Brookhaven Press. p. 488. ISBN 978-1-4035-0045-8. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
- ^ Kleinfeld, N. R. (November 12, 2000). "Counting the Vote: The History; President Tilden? No, but Almost, in Another Vote That Dragged On". The New York Times.
- ^ Dill, R.G. (1895). The Political Campaigns of Colorado. Arapahoe Publishing Company, John Dove. p. 27. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
- ^ Schalit, Naomi (October 1, 2020). "Could a few state legislatures choose the next president?". The Conversation. Retrieved November 2, 2020.
- ^ Holt, Michael F, By One Vote, University Press of Kansas, 2008, pp. 167, 255
- ^ Nicholas Lemann, Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War, New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, Paperback, 2007, p. 174
- ^ "Flashback to 1876: History repeats itself". BBC News. London. December 12, 2000. Retrieved November 28, 2006.
- ^ a b c d e f g Andrews, E. Benjamin (1912). History of the United States. Charles Scribner's Sons.
- ^ a b Morris, Roy, Jr. (2003). Fraud of the Century: Rutherford B. Hayes, Samuel Tilden and the Stolen Election of 1876. New York: Simon and Schuster, pp. 168, 239. ISBN 978-0-7432-5552-3
- ^ "Hayes v. Tilden: The Electoral College Controversy of 1876–1877." Archived February 20, 2006, at the Wayback Machine HarpWeek
- ^ Abramson, Aldrich & Rohde 1995, p. 99.
- ^ Sherman 1973, p. 263.
- ^ The Political Graveyard; Mitchell County, North Carolina
- ^ Sullivan, Robert David; 'How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century'; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
- ^ Leip, David. "1876 Presidential Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved July 27, 2005.
- ^ "Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 31, 2005.
- ^ "1876 Presidential General Election Data – National". Retrieved May 7, 2013.
Works cited
[edit]- Abramson, Paul; Aldrich, John; Rohde, David (1995). Change and Continuity in the 1992 Elections. CQ Press. ISBN 0871878399.
- Sherman, Richard (1973). The Republican Party and Black America From McKinley to Hoover 1896-1933. University of Virginia Press. ISBN 0813904676.
Sources
[edit]- John Bigelow, Author, Edited by, Nikki Oldaker, The Life of Samuel J. Tilden. (2009 Revised edition-retype-set-new photos). 444 pages, ISBN 978-0-9786698-1-2 original 1895 edition
- Holt, Michael F. By One Vote: The Disputed Presidential Election of 1876. (2008). 304 pages, ISBN 978-0-7006-1608-4
- Flick, Alexander C. (1939). Samuel J. Tilden – A Study In Political Sagacity.
- Foley, Edward. 2016. Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States. Oxford University Press.
- Haworth, Paul Leland (1906). The Hayes-Tilden Disputed Presidential Election of 1876. Burrows Brothers Company.
Campaign Text Book.
- Hoogenboom, Ari (1995). Rutherford B. Hayes: Warrior and President. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0-7006-0641-6.
- Huntzicker, William E. "Thomas Nast, Harper's Weekly, and the Election of 1876." in After The War (Routledge, 2017) pp. 53–68.
- Morris, Roy Jr. (2004). Fraud Of The Century: Rutherford B. Hayes, Samuel Tilden And The Stolen Election Of 1876.
- Polakoff, Keith Ian (1973). The Politics of Inertia: The Election of 1876 and the End of Reconstruction.
- Rehnquist, William H. (2004). The Centennial Crisis: The Disputed Election of 1876. Knopf Publishing Group. ISBN 0-375-41387-1., popular account
- Summers, Mark Wahlgren.The Press Gang: Newspapers and Politics, 1865–1878 (1994)
- Summers, Mark Wahlgren. The Era of Good Stealings (1993), covers corruption 1868–1877
- Richard White, "Corporations, Corruption, and the Modern Lobby: A Gilded Age Story of the West and the South in Washington, D.C." Southern Spaces, April 16, 2009
- Woodward, C. Vann (1951). Reunion and Reaction: The Compromise of 1877 and the End of Reconstruction.
Further reading
[edit]- Calhoun, Charles W. Conceiving a New Republic: The Republican Party and the Southern Question, 1869–1900 (University Press of Kansas, 2006) .
- Clendenen, Clarence C. "President Hayes'" Withdrawal" of the Troops: An Enduring Myth." South Carolina Historical Magazine 70.4 (1969): 240–250. online
- De Santis, Vincent P. " Rutherford B. Hayes and the Removal of the Troops and the End of Reconstruction," in Region, Race, and Reconstruction: Essays in Honor of C. Vann Woodward .ed by Morgan Kousser and James McPherson, (Oxford University Press, 1982) 417–451.
- Flynn, James Joseph. "The Disputed Election of 1876" (PhD dissertation, Fordham University; ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 1953. 10992419).
- Holt, Michael F. By one vote: the disputed presidential election of 1876 (University Press of Kansas, 2008) online
- Palen, Marc-William. "Election of 1876/Compromise of 1877." in A Companion to the Reconstruction Presidents 1865–1881 (2014): 415–430. doi:10.1002/9781118607879.ch21
- Peskin, Allan. "Was there a Compromise of 1877." Journal of American History 60.1 (1973): 63–75. online
- Woodward, C. Vann. "Yes, there was a Compromise of 1877." Journal of American History 60#2 (1973): 215–23.
- Shofner, Jerrell H. "Fraud and Intimidation in the Florida Election of 1876." Florida Historical Quarterly 42.4 (1964): 321–330. online
- Simpson, Brooks D. "Ulysses S. Grant and the Electoral Crisis of 1876–77." Hayes Historical Journal . 11 (1992): 5–17.
- Sternstein, Jerome L. "The Sickles Memorandum: Another Look at the Hayes-Tilden Election-Night Conspiracy." Journal of Southern History (1966): 342–357. online
- Zuczek, Richard. "The last campaign of the Civil War: South Carolina and the revolution of 1876." Civil War History 42.1 (1996): 18–31. excerpt
Primary sources
[edit]- Appleton's Annual Cyclopedia ...for 1876 (1885), comprehensive state-by-state coverage
- Democratic National Committee (1876). The Campaign Text Book: Why the People Want a Change. The Republican Party Reviewed... National Democratic committee. p. 1.
Colfax massacre.
- Chester, Edward W A guide to political platforms (1977) online
- Porter, Kirk H. and Donald Bruce Johnson, eds. National party platforms, 1840–1964 (1965) online 1840–1956
External links
[edit]- Baker, Peter (January 6, 2021). "You Think This Is Chaos? The Election of 1876 Was Worse". New York Times. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
- Hayes Presidential Library with essays by historians
- Presidential Election of 1876: A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress
- Rutherford B. Hayes On The Election of 1876: Original Letter Archived May 24, 2022, at the Wayback Machine Shapell Manuscript Foundation
- 1876 popular vote by counties
- Hayes vs. Tilden: The Electoral College Controversy of 1876–1877
- Election of 1876 in Counting the Votes Archived December 18, 2019, at the Wayback Machine