Talk:Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Project
[edit]We r doing a project on sep 11
we would like 2 get in touch with survivers & firefighters from the incedent. We r hoping u can assist us in doing this project by giving us info on september 11th. thank you
Break out See Also
[edit]The See Also list would work better as a separate section and not part of Monetary Cost.Laundrypowder 18:07, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Can someone help marry up the long list of sources with the body of the article to knock it into encyclopedic form please. Escaper7 10:34, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
rewrite suggestions
[edit]the first line reads "The area surrounding the World Trade Center became the site of the greatest number of casualties and missing..."
compared to what?
I changed it to "The area surrounding the World Trade Center became the site of the greatest number of casualties and missing, due to a single incident, in the history of the United States" Is that better? The WTC casualties outnumber the Pearl Harbor attack casualties - see Attack on Pearl Harbor Roger (talk) 07:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
As of 2018? Is there nothing more current? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:4300:EE90:4995:6EFE:9C91:7DAA (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Communications
[edit]There's a lot in the article about the emergency service's communication systems failing but absolutely no mention of the hundreds of volunteer Amateur Radio operators who stepped in and provided a system that worked very well. Someone with better writing skills than me please add to this article. Here are 2 very good sources - http://hometown.aol.com/realhamradio/ this is a first person account of the ham who controlled the communications at "ground zero" and this http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/WTC.pdf is an article published by the American Radio Relay League. Roger 09:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 29 March 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: To be moved to Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center per GregKaye suggestion. It's a very unwieldy looking title, but there seems to be a consensus, and no obvious shorter forms leap out. Note: the page is move requested, so I will request the move at WP:RM/TR. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks → New York City rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks – The article is completely about the events undertaken in New York City. I read the title and assumed otherwise, but it is basically just about ground zero activities and the World Trade Centers, not the other locations. I would have normally moved this on my own, but it appears to be locked by an administrator for unknown and unlogged reasons because I checked the log. I like to saw logs! (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Suggest Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Small point but some of the rescuers/ recovery effort makers will have come from / been based elsewhere. GregKaye 11:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Agrees with Suggestion to move it to Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. New York can be a bit vague, and the attack was confined to the buildings. I like to saw logs! (talk) 04:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Rescue and recovery effort after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080630042853/http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/harvey.html to http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/harvey.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.groundzeromuseumworkshop.com/lingo.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327152416/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-12-22/politics/911.bill_1_first-responders-funding-votes-house-members?_s=PM%3APOLITICS to http://articles.cnn.com/2010-12-22/politics/911.bill_1_first-responders-funding-votes-house-members?_s=PM:POLITICS
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023030028/http://www.groundzeromuseumworkshop.com/home.html to http://www.groundzeromuseumworkshop.com/home.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
9/11
[edit]How many people were pulled from the rubble 69.113.40.171 (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class September 11, 2001 articles
- Top-importance September 11, 2001 articles
- WikiProject September 11, 2001 articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Firefighting articles
- High-importance Firefighting articles
- WikiProject Firefighting articles