Talk:Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Alternative music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Weird Al" video

Sorry I had to take out that long description of the Weird Al video, but it dosn't really have anything to do with this song. I moved it to a new seprate article.--The_stuart 02:09, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Requested move

Mmm, Mmm, Mmm, Mmm → Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm. The latter (without commas) is how it is given on the Crash Test Dummies website, and it seems to be the more common use. Jonathunder 15:49, 2005 Apr 2 (UTC)

Also, the version without commas appears to be where the article was originally, and most wikilinks still go there. Jonathunder 15:56, 2005 Apr 2 (UTC)

The version without commas is just a redirect to the version with commas and has no history, so (iirc) the move doesn't need a sysop. I've had a quick scan of my CD collection and I've not found a single example of the title including commas. Thryduulf 16:35, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, Thryduulf. I'll go ahead and move this, then, if there are no objections. Jonathunder 19:08, 2005 Apr 3 (UTC)

Move completed and all "what links here" updated. Jonathunder 07:53, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)

Impossibly deep voice

The singer's voice isn't actually that deep. This song is nicely mid-range for a bass. It's just that, sadly, most of us don't have the incredible resonance that the singer on this song gets. Hughcharlesparker 16:01, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shakers

The article says that the lyrics of this song mention "a boy whose family belonged to a peculiar religious sect, possibly the Shakers". This refers to the lyrics of the song:

Cause then there was this boy whose Parents made him come directly home right after school And when they went to their church They shook and lurched all over the church floor

However, how could the boy's parents be Shakers if members of that sect are celibate? --BNJT 01:41, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the article on the Shakers? It says that they did adopt. Whilst it may not be the best answer, I do seem to recall adopted children calling the adults "parents". Then again, maybe it's just me. - DrachenFyre

Good question. I think an allusion to Holy Roller is much more likely. Also, someone added "It is also the highest charting single ever whose title only consists of the same letter" which I don't doubt is true, but are there be other singles matching that description to compete with, really? Jonathunder 23:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems likely that it is the only high chart topping single consisting of only one letter. Might as well leave it until someone proves otherwise. --The_stuart 00:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added it, based on one of the "charts" in an NME yearbook I have. Also take note that there are a lot of singles named "I" :) //Gargaj 20:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning of the Shakers seems like a wild guess to me. Removed, and should be sourced if put back. // habj 01:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the song is about Pentecostals and Catholic Charismatics rather than Shakers. The line "They shook and lurched all over the church floor" seems to me as a reference to the fact that during their services they faint or rather pretend to faint. If you could chose between having to endure two or three hours of those services and having to listen to Wisin y Yandel and Brokencyde 24 hours, you would chose the second option. I'm kidding, I would do neither. Nite-Sirk (talk) 23:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actual meaning

I'm not sure I agree with the article's description that the song describes "the isolation and suffering of a child who was inexplicably abnormal". In fact, I think it's about the kind of made up stories little kids enjoy telling their friends. Especially since the song's title is "mmm mmm", the sound people make when they don't believe what they are being told. It isn't about suffering, it's about stuff kids make up. Of course, this is my interpretation. 201.235.51.167 23:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

During its run in 1994 it was repeatedly said the song may have actually been about child abuse and the ignorance (from other children) surrounding it. Drdr1989 04:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really doubt that's the real meaning. SPKx 13:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you examine the well known version of the lyrics, you will first find a boy whose long absence from school (potentially due to child abuse) is inadequately explained, and the other detail that his hair is now white, not a possible consequence of a car crash in any universe, is given a ridiculous excuse. There is clearly something that the child and the parents don't care to talk about. Continuing with the well known version of the lyrics, the girl in the changing room has bruises, not birthmarks, and she cannot explain them.

The message then is that somehow having parents bringing a small boy to an unusual and perhaps unsettling church service is worse...

There are also other versions of the lyrics which substantiate the 'abuse' position, replacing the church service verse with a verse about a mother who out of spite disposes of a boy's tonsils which he wanted to bring to show and tell. Matthew Platts 23:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that follows logically. However, following the child abuse interpretation, the first verse child has seen something that shocked him, and the third verse child had it "worse than that". His parents have indoctrinated him into their religion without any choice, and do not allow him to interact socially with the other children.

I imagine the replacement verse was sung on tour in particularly religious areas of the US.Connectionfailure (talk) 05:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I'm over analysing or under analysing the song or something but has it occurred to any of you that rather than being a po-faced dirge about child abuse that perhaps it's just a rather silly song about children who are actually real crash test dummies?188.29.107.43 (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101216073900/http://www.blender.com:80/lists/61412/the50worstsongseverwatchlistenandcringe.html?p=4 to http://www.blender.com/lists/61412/the50worstsongseverwatchlistenandcringe.html?p=4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Release date

The release date for this song is listed both as September 1993 in the article for the song, and October 1993 in the article for the album. CltNC830 (talk) 15:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Niagara Scow and white hair

Through WP:SYNTH I have pretty much figured out that the Niagara Falls incident that was the inspiration for the "bright white" verse was incident with the Niagara Scow, though it appears that the hair whitening has always been a rumo(u)r and never happened. Is it worth finding a RS on this, or would it just be considered trivia? Mapsax (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmm" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmm has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19 § Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmm Mmmmm until a consensus is reached. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 14:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]