Jump to content

Talk:The IPCRESS File

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Need to mention Funeral in Berlin and Billion Dollar Brain.

Done, I put them in the "See also" section. --Commander Keane 13:02, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

IMDB lists Bullet to Beijing and Midnight in St. Petersburg. as 1996 - this should change, yes?

Capitalisation error: the name of the film is the IPCRESS File, not the Ipcress File. IPCRESS is an acronym —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.102.152 (talkcontribs)

Yeeeessss... that would appear to be correct. And its what the book cover sez William M. Connolley 19:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It may be worth mentioning that Deighton is said to have written The IPCRESS File in longhand in an exercise book during a vacation in France. Deighton subsequently acknowledged that the work was too terse: because of his inexperience, he expected readers to pick up and remember incidental comments or plot details. Even a number of re-readings will not necessarily explain the action satisfactorily .... Nevertheless, a striking debut in a distinctive style, still eminently readable and enjoyable.

Shoes

[edit]

Maybe President Bush was thinking of this novel when he referred to size 10 shoes in the shoe-throwing incident. Size 10s are mentioned in chapter two, paragraph two, sentence two. 89.240.202.111 (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"size tens" is familiar British slang e.g. [1] so not necessarily from this novel. Perhaps from his old mate Tony Blair.. Cormullion (talk) 22:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification request

[edit]

In the Plot section, the acronym IPCRESS is explained as Induction of Psycho-neuroses by Conditioned REflex with Stress", but in the Background section it is now "Induction of Psycho-neuroses by Conditioned Reflex _under_ Stress". Can we get some clarification on this??

Thanks! WesT (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is nowhere stated or implied that Dalby was executed

[edit]

The new wording is fine, rather more subtle than the old; but the edit comment is wrong; on p 210 our hero tells the American "I told him about Dalby being killed," William M. Connolley (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Plot Summary is a shambles

[edit]

I've just re-read the novel, and came to read the Wikipedia article out of curiosity. The plot section seems to have been edited down from a longer one, but badly, since there are references to characters (Ross, Murray and Carswell) without context. 84.13.231.137 (talk) 19:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Plod[reply]