Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates
Skip to: |
Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.
If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here. The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results. If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.
A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture. For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance. Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.
|
Featured picture tools: |
Step 1:
Evaluate Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations. |
Step 2:
Create a subpage
To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.
To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.
|
Step 3:
Transclude and link Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list ( ). |
How to comment for Candidate Images
How to comment for Delist Images
Editing candidates
Is my monitor adjusted correctly? In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting. Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting. On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate. Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended. |
- To see recent changes, .
FPCs needing feedback
|
---|
Current nominations
[edit]Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 17:22:07 (UTC)
- Reason
- Meets the FPC critia. High encyclopedic value since it is our best image of 12P/Pons–Brooks and its going to be difficult to get a replacement since its not due back until 2095. Green colour is due to diatomic carbon and is common in comets despite the media getting rather excited about it at the time.
- Articles in which this image appears
- 12P/Pons–Brooks
- FP category for this image
- Space
- Creator
- Nielander
- Support as nominator – ©Geni (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – LGTM ZZZ'S 18:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 14:33:14 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quite a nice image. I've sharpened it slightly, removed dust and scratches, and fixed some localised browning.
- Articles in which this image appears
- P. L. Travers and a few new additions and minor pages.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
- Creator
- Unknown photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 14:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support. I have some of the same technical quibbles with this as I did with the portrait of Lucie Delarue-Mardrus, from a few days ago, but the fact that you can see the film grain convinces me that the soft areas are authentic to the source photograph rather than a reproduction shortcoming. I have one suggestion: remove a bit of hair that got on the negative around the dress's waist area if you think you can do so cleanly. It's the only thing I see that you missed on your otherwise very thorough restoration. Moonreach (talk) 18:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Think that's a hair? I was torn between that and some sort of buckle. Kind of leaning, like, a metal loop holding the flowers on, but... Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 19:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- We may be looking at different things. I'm looking at a very thin, irregular white line that curves through a sort of flower design at the waist. If you still think it's part of the costume then leave it; it's not a deal-breaker either way. Moonreach (talk) 13:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Moonreach: Just to note, while looking at it, I spotted a couple more specks and got them. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 19:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Think that's a hair? I was torn between that and some sort of buckle. Kind of leaning, like, a metal loop holding the flowers on, but... Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 19:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 12:04:24 (UTC)
- Reason
- A Featured Media on Commons
- Articles in which this image appears
- His Girl Friday
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- Howard Hawks
- Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 12:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I was the uploader on this one. It's worth noting that this video is impacted by phabricator:T362831 (MediaWiki not transcoding HDR properly), so you'll notice the UHD source has HDR but the HD transcodes that MediaWiki produces are in SDR without a proper tonemapping. For cases like this, I'm not sure if it would be better to add a notice to the file page advising readers of the difference or do a UHD upload in SDR. It's a good transfer with encyclopedic value, so if that question can be settled, I'd support. hinnk (talk) 21:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 05:07:11 (UTC)
- Reason
- Nosferatu is on our WP:FILM/CORE list and remains one of the best-known silent films. For many years it was officially pulled from circulation (as an unauthorized Dracula adaptation), but it's since been restored by the Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau Foundation.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Nosferatu
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- F. W. Murnau (director)
- Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Moonreach (talk) 13:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 13:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 10:17:04 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. Has stuck (previous nomination was premature).
- Articles in which this image appears
- Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse, etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
- Creator
- David Adams
- Support as nominator – MER-C 10:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Old news. – Sca (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Glad to see this get nominated. It's one that I wanted to nominate myself back when the event was current, but the guidelines were to let the article stabilize, and at some point I forgot about it. Moonreach (talk) 18:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Old news, for sure, but quite an extraordinary incident. --Janke | Talk 06:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ―Howard • 🌽33 14:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 10:09:27 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- White-bibbed babbler
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- JJ Harrison
- Support as nominator – MER-C 10:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ―Howard • 🌽33 14:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 14:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 11:22:56 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality Google Art Project scan of the Renaissance painting with excellent EV in a FA.
- Articles in which this image appears
- The Blind Leading the Blind
- FP category for this image
- Paintings
- Creator
- Pieter Bruegel the Elder/Museo di Capodimonte
- Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support; and this painting also by Aersten is a FP. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – I am neutral on voting. The source link says "This painting is an old copy of the original kept in Naples at the Museo Nazionale di Capodimonte". I assume the original painting is the infobox image in This version of the article. I think the fact that the nom image (which is currently the infobox image) is a "copy of the original" should be stated in the article (and on the file page). Bammesk (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – The wording "old copy" is confusing. Often, an artist made several versions of a painting (e.g. Munch's Scream). If this "copy" can be credited to Bruegel, I'll support. --Janke | Talk 06:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Legacy section of the article has a paragraph on copies, and no mention that "Bruegel the Elder" did a copy. It says his son "Brueghel the Younger" did a copy around 1616 (the father died in 1569). This source says the nom version was done by the son (I am not sure about the reliability of the source though). BTW, the original [1] and the copy [2] have differences, for instance see the lower left corner. Bammesk (talk) 01:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 18:30:37 (UTC)
- Reason
- Passed all of the criteria & is a high-quality (4,000 × 3,000 pixels) photograph of some damage from the 2024 Greenfield tornado
- Articles in which this image appears
- 2024 Greenfield tornado
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
- Creator
- ChristopherRiske (Wikimedia Commons User)
- Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Sca: I just copied and pasted the image’s original caption in the nomination’s caption. This image is used in the “aftermath” section of the tornado. I may be looking at this through the lens of something who understands weather, but the tornado was very narrow (discussed in the article) and it seems clear where the worst damage path is in the photo. Could you maybe explain what exactly is “not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers”? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 14:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well executed drone photo that clearly shows the destruction this tornado caused to houses. Nick-D (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 18:50:59 (UTC)
- Reason
- A really nice portrait - just out of (American) copyright this year - and a huge upgrade on the old lead image. Biggest flaw is the 1920s retouching, which I've done what I could with.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Lucie Delarue-Mardrus +1
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
- Creator
- Henri Manuel restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 18:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 13:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose— It has good composition, but up close pretty much everything is slightly blurry (except the underside of the chin, oddly) and the face seems to be nothing but airbrushing. Moonreach (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)- I mean, the business is pretty normal for this era at this scale. As for the nderside of the chin... That's down to the 1928 image retouching. I don't think it really affected the chin shape much, and the face as a whole - other than some scratches on the cheek - didn't seem abnormal for the era. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 13:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, so it should be considered a kind of era-specific limitation, akin to scratch marks? I can see that. I'm not enthusiastic enough to support this, but I'll strike my oppose. Moonreach (talk) 20:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, the business is pretty normal for this era at this scale. As for the nderside of the chin... That's down to the 1928 image retouching. I don't think it really affected the chin shape much, and the face as a whole - other than some scratches on the cheek - didn't seem abnormal for the era. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 13:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 17:03:42 (UTC)
- Reason
- one of the most well know Charlie Chaplin films ever, also, this has earned a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes
- Articles in which this image appears
- The Kid (1921 film)
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- Charlie Chaplin
- Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 17:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support - of course! --Janke | Talk 18:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support hinnk (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support. It's a masterpiece indeed. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Moonreach (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 19:50:29 (UTC)
- Reason
- Battleship Potemkin is a WP:FILM/CORE article on our List of films voted the best. This video is from a 2005 restoration of the original Soviet version, which reinstated the intertitles and shots that had been censored in later international releases.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Battleship Potemkin
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- Sergei Eisenstein (director)
- Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question — Where are the subtitles sourced from? I'm worried they might be separately copyrighted. Moonreach (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- The Russian intertitles are from archived prints (derived from the original Soviet release), and the translated English subtitles I grabbed from this version. If there are any issues, the alternative would be to use Mosfilm's translation (on Commons and YouTube). It's only ~150 titles, so it wouldn't take long to do. hinnk (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'll support, then. I've scrubbed through the film and everything about it looks good. Moonreach (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- The Russian intertitles are from archived prints (derived from the original Soviet release), and the translated English subtitles I grabbed from this version. If there are any issues, the alternative would be to use Mosfilm's translation (on Commons and YouTube). It's only ~150 titles, so it wouldn't take long to do. hinnk (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Matarisvan (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 10:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 16:33:38 (UTC)
- Reason
- Lively demonstration of the Kinemacolor two-color film process, an important milestone in the history of color photography. Apart from imperfections in the original, this is a very good transfer. The frame rate is at or near real-time (often a problem with showing films from the hand-cranked era) and in HD. The source at the Internet Archive (1) says these are the original colors plus a white-balance pass. Kinemacolor was also a sequential color system, which is why some movement has anaglyph-like effects to it.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Kinemacolor, Reedham Orphanage
- FP category for this image
- Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
- Creator
- Uploaded to Wikipedia by Cesias7 from a copy at the Internet Archive, where it is credited to Natural Color Kinematograph Co., Ltd.
- Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting example of pre-Technicolor movies, amazingly little color strobing in the fast-fluttering flags! (Partly because the red and blue registered only on respective frames...) --Janke | Talk 17:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- This does seem to have the frames blended, inasmuch as pausing it in any given place still shows both colors. I checked our copy against the one on the Internet Archive and found that it's the same there; both are 25 fps. While I would have liked to see a version that preserved the sequential color, I'm not sure that would have been possible. I also don't think it would have made a difference as far as the strobing goes. Since a small period of time elapses between the color changes, there's no version of this where the colors would have lined up perfectly. That's an unsolvable problem akin to reconstructing a single frame out of interlaced video - you can get close, but never exact. Although the bitrate of the Internet Archive copy is higher, and maybe we should upload that one just to have it, this is otherwise about as good as it gets. Moonreach (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excited to see this getting nominated, I was just looking through this article last week after going through some predecessor films by William Norman Lascelles Davidson. We only have one other HD example of Kinemacolor, and this video does a much better job of showing how it captures different kinds of motion. hinnk (talk) 19:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- And the sweet peas appear to be shot from a theater screen, hand-held, with a spectator blocking the lowest part of the frame - so that one is definitely not FP material... --Janke | Talk 06:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh my god, I didn't even catch that part. I was wondering why they were shifting the image down in the middle of the video. hinnk (talk) 08:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hahaha, yeah. I realized about 10 seconds in that I was looking at the back of someone's head and wondered if I should say something. Moonreach (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh my god, I didn't even catch that part. I was wondering why they were shifting the image down in the middle of the video. hinnk (talk) 08:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- There's more Kinemacolor than just this film, for example on archive.org (a quick sidenote: almost all of these films weren't digitized in HD, including this one - I can't remember why I uploaded it at such a high resolution) Cesias7 (talk) 10:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- The IA version is at the same resolution, were you also the uploader there? Considering the alternative examples all seem to be watermarked or super compressed, I'd be fine featuring this even if it was upscaled. hinnk (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I uploaded them to IA. This film, the shortest of them all (7 seconds of footage repeated 3x), is the only one which was digitized in HD. The others are all 720x576, except for a few scenes in the Delhi Durbar, which are even lower quality. Cesias7 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Shame it's watermarked, that's a fun piece of footage. I like seeing candid moments from long ago. They make the past feel more real. Moonreach (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I uploaded them to IA. This film, the shortest of them all (7 seconds of footage repeated 3x), is the only one which was digitized in HD. The others are all 720x576, except for a few scenes in the Delhi Durbar, which are even lower quality. Cesias7 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- The IA version is at the same resolution, were you also the uploader there? Considering the alternative examples all seem to be watermarked or super compressed, I'd be fine featuring this even if it was upscaled. hinnk (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- And the sweet peas appear to be shot from a theater screen, hand-held, with a spectator blocking the lowest part of the frame - so that one is definitely not FP material... --Janke | Talk 06:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carlosmarkos2345 | Talk 08:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Nominations — to be closed
[edit]Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 11:13:51 (UTC)
- Reason
- The image has a high technical standard, with no "graininess" or anything like that, I don't know about criteria 2, considering the picture has a resolution of 1,126 × 2,000 pixels. The picture also passes criteria 3, considering the picture is good-looking (according to me). The image has a free license, the description is verified by a source, and the description is also useful in describing the church. The image also does not have digital manipulation considering.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Santa Fe, Leyte
- FP category for this image
- Architecture
- Creator
- TheNuggeteer
- Support as nominator –
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
11:13, 29 July 2024 (UTC) - Oppose - Indistinct foreground, crooked orientation. – Sca (talk) 12:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per above, also only 1126 px wide. Looks like there are fingerprints on the lens of the phone. --Janke | Talk 16:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose; per Sca. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose – This is a bad nomination ZZZ'S 03:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- To give TheNuggeteer credit, they clearly went through the checklist and tried to satisfy the requirements. I also think a professional photograph taken inside this building could easy drum up enough support to pass; the choice of subject was good. That said, I see a number of flaws that prevent me from supporting this one: Streaking in highlights, low resolution, muddiness in mid-tones, and less-than-ideal framing. There's also no good target article for the church, just one for the town it's in. For these reasons, I also oppose. Moonreach (talk) 15:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @TheNuggeteer: There's a great tool on Commons called CropTool. If you have a picture like this but want to adjust the size to remove the umbrella at the bottom, it can be very useful. hinnk (talk) 08:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Of course, cropping an already small image kills its chances here...--Janke | Talk 18:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Older nominations requiring additional input from users
[edit]These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.
Closing procedure
[edit]A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC
When NOT promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing
{{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}}
on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.
When promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
- Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
- Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
- Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
- The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
- Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
- Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
- If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
- Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
- If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the August archive. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}}
from this page to the bottom of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Delist closing procedure
[edit]Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.
If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:
- Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.
If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.
If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
- Replace the
{{Featured picture}}
tag from the delisted image with{{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}
. - Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
- Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
- Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the top of the section. - Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line
{{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}}
to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive. - If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Recently closed nominations
[edit]Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 21:12:17 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Tunisian tortoise
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 02:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 09:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Tunisian tortoise (Testudo graeca nabeulensis) male Cap Bon 2.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 21:07:38 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. Adds EV to article. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Palla ussheri
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Not entirely enthused with the stem, but for some reason the ants on it really add to the picture (maybe for scale?) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 02:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 09:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Ussher's palla (Palla ussheri ussheri) underside Nyamebe Bepo.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 20:56:50 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. Adds EV to article. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Neurothemis fluctuans
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 09:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Red grasshawk (Neurothemis fluctuans) male Phuket 2.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 11:15:53 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Grey-headed honeyeater
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- JJ Harrison
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Grey-headed Honeyeater 0A2A3929.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 11:13:17 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons a month ago. To replace existing FP File:SeattleI5Skyline.jpg.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Transportation in Seattle etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
- Creator
- Dllu
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support as creator. dllu (t,c) 18:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – well done (too bad the stars didn't pose for the camera). Bammesk (talk) 01:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Seattle I5 skyline dllu.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 04:55:31 (UTC)
- Reason
- Great quality and detail, adds EV. Unanimously promoted to FP, QI, and VI on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Dunnock
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – ZZZ'S 04:55, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 11:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Dunnock (Prunella modularis) 3.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 08:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 03:12:57 (UTC)
- Reason
- Extremely high EV for one of the strongest tornadoes ever recorded, and the third highest wind speed ever measured on earth (Tornado records#Highest winds observed in a tornado). Tornado was also academically studied (Research on tornadoes in 2024#Greenfield tornado) by several organizations. High EV public domain photograph no less as well.
NOTE: The image barely fails the second FP criteria, as it is 2,048 × 1,366 pixels. However, per the criteria, "Exceptions to this rule may be made where justified on a case-by-case basis, such as for historical, technically difficult or otherwise unique images
", so this is being nominated under the grounds of an exception to FPC #2. - Articles in which this image appears
- List:
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
- Creator
- Isaac Polanski, uploaded by TornadoLGS
- Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – one time event, and very nice composition. I agree with taking an exception per above. Bammesk (talk) 01:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Agree as per above; an excellent photo considering how fast the conditions were shifting. Moonreach (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question - The source credits Isaac Polanski via Twitter. His post corroborates this. However, I'm not seeing if he is working for the US Government; rather, he is a "stringer" for a storm media licensing company (Their Twitter). Are we sure that the NWS had the right to release the image into the public domain? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492:Yes. Per Template:PD-NWS on the Commons. The NWS actually has this clause stated for users submitting images to them: "
By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others
". One of the other tornadic Featured Pictures (File:Lincoln, NE EF3 tornado.jpg) is under the same license on the Commons as well. Tons of discussions on the Commons have determined it is valid. To not clog this FPC up, I won't link them all here, but if you want me to, I can link you several discussions on the Commons surrounding the PD-NWS guidelines. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)- No, that works for me. Support. This is an image we'd never be able to take again, and the quality is excellent. When the creator even says that it's one of the few times he's been intimidated by a tornado, we have something special. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492:Yes. Per Template:PD-NWS on the Commons. The NWS actually has this clause stated for users submitting images to them: "
- Support – ZZZ'S 02:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Greenfield IA tornado 2024.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 08:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 16:23:58 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quite a nice image of an under-photographed person.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Samuel Plimsoll
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
- Creator
- Lock and Whitfield; restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 16:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 11:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think the second image in the article has more EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'd agree, but there's no copy of it available at sufficient quality. (Also, it looked like this before I researched that copy of the image, so, y'know, only has EV because of the research that included this one.) Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 16:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC
- Support – the other photo is too unsharp. Bammesk (talk) 01:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Samuel Plimsoll by Lock and Whitfield.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 19:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 00:23:28 (UTC)
- Reason
- one of the most well know, iconic and well received art pieces of all time
- Articles in which this image appears
- The Scream, Edvard Munch, Expressionism, Modern art etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
- Creator
- Edvard Munch
- Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 00:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Carlosmarkos2345: FYI nominators do remove items at FPC urgents once urgent conditions no longer apply. In this case, several days ago once the nom got 5 votes. Bammesk (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is this the recognized 'best-according-to-art-experts' version and are the colours/tone true to life? Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well, there are black pixels (0, in the join at right) and totally white pixels (255, white brush strokes) so it appears the exposure is spot on. However, the tone curve may be off, making the overall look very murky... Haven't seen it "live", so I can't say for sure. --Janke | Talk 10:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Looks under-saturated. -- Sca (talk) 12:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well, there are black pixels (0, in the join at right) and totally white pixels (255, white brush strokes) so it appears the exposure is spot on. However, the tone curve may be off, making the overall look very murky... Haven't seen it "live", so I can't say for sure. --Janke | Talk 10:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – It has a reliable source. The color tones (contrast, etc.) match the sample crop on the National Gallery of Norway's source page [3]. (and shot with a pro camera) Bammesk (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Colors match up with the Gallery's scan ―Howard • 🌽33 07:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 14:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Edvard Munch, 1893, The Scream, oil, tempera and pastel on cardboard, 91 x 73 cm, National Gallery of Norway.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 00:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 00:47:12 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality portrait of Paul Parkman, one of the inventors of the rubella vaccine.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Paul Parkman
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
- Creator
- Author unknown
- Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Man in suit & tie. Unexceptional NIH publicity shot. – Sca (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This is a useful photo that shows what this notable person looks like, but doesn't provide any indication of why they're notable. Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 05:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 00:36:04 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and resolution
- Articles in which this image appears
- Portrait of Charles Marcotte, Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, National Gallery of Art etc.
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
- Creator
- Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres
- Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ―Howard • 🌽33 23:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but I note that the NGA's colours changed significantly between scans. This one seems to have a higher saturation point. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Ingres Marcotte d-Argenteuil.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 05:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 00:05:02 (UTC)
- Reason
- When I first read the B-roll article, the process was described in text but was difficult to understand. I researched the process and created this diagram to illustrate the complex procedure
- Articles in which this image appears
- B-roll
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams
- Creator
- RoySmith
- Support as nominator – RoySmith (talk) 00:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 01:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is a really nicely made diagram. I think it relies on familiarity with some concepts that the lay reader won't have, especially if they're more used to digital production. Here are some thoughts on how this might be communicated more clearly:
- "Head" and "tail" have technical meanings that aren't explained in the article and aren't obvious from the diagram.
- The dotted lines aren't explainable from the diagram alone, so if the reader doesn't know what the splices looks like, they see a Shot 2 that's exactly 5 frames long but a label that says it goes past that.
- The difference between A-roll and B-roll isn't clear from the diagram. It maybe would work better if the durations of the shots were different, or if the frames used images that would be understood as primary footage and a cutaway.
- How these strips relate to each other or the final print isn't explained. This maybe connects to the other point, where showing the exposure of the primary shots, with a few frames in between, and then a separate exposure that fills those in with a simple-looking insert to create the full version would work better.
- I hope any of this is helpful. hinnk (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose As a retired filmmaker, I consider the correct term for this image not "B-roll", but "A-B negative cutting/editing". B-roll by itself means extra footage, and the illustration is not about that. Thus, the explanation text and the image are in the wrong article. Would support the image if it were in an A-B cutting article. --Janke | Talk 11:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I'm going to withdraw this. Thank you all for your comments, and especially to hinnk for providing some excellent feedback on how this could be improved. RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Not Promoted --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2024 at 19:11:07 (UTC)
- Reason
- Per last nomination, a restored version. I'm using the title from the Library of Congress; The word negro was a lot more acceptable and polite in 1939, but it feels wrong to change the title at our end before the holding library does.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Discrimination, Discrimination in the United States, Jim Crow laws, Plessy v. Ferguson, Racial segregation, Racism, Separate but equal + 5
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American
- Creator
- Russell Lee, restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 19:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – I also support a bit of sharpening. Bammesk (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Bammesk: Done. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 05:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 12:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ―Howard • 🌽33 16:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- And again apologies for the delay. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 20:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- no problem. thanks for the restoration ―Howard • 🌽33 23:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- And again apologies for the delay. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 20:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bad left crop was careless unless this is a crop of the original. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- The original two copies show film edges there. It's possible Lee intended to crop it: can't really change aspect ratio on a film camera - but my rule is to let our reusers do any desired crops unless there's a very good reason (severe damage, very minor crops of blank areas to centre subject or lose vignetting, crop mark on image (though I tend to play crop marks by ear; hard to tell publisher ones from artist ones, and publishers of the time may be cropping for crappy halftone newspaper reproduction) Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 16:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well executed photo with strong EV. It illustrates its topic well, including by highlighting just how stupid this all was. Nick-D (talk) 11:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler in streetcar terminal, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma by Russell Lee.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2024 at 00:08:09 (UTC)
- Reason
- Napoléon (1927 film) is a WP:FILM/CORE article, and Napoléon entered the U.S. public domain last year. It's the best-known work by director Abel Gance, and probably of the French impressionist film movement.
- Technical notes because this one was a doozy: The pillarboxing here is intentional, in the last 20 minutes there's a famous sequence where it becomes a widescreen Polyvision arrangement. The extreme length means we're approaching Wikipedia's technical limits, and only low-quality transcodes succeed so you have to select "Source" in the video player. I kept it as a single video since it wasn't released in parts and 2Mbps is still equivalent to a video2commons output. The alternative is a 4-video set of each act (higher bitrate, HD transcodes would complete, and no letterboxing on the first 3), would be great if reviewers indicated the format they'd prefer.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Napoléon (1927 film), Polyvision
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
- Creator
- Abel Gance (director)
- Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 00:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Not that I'm going to watch the 5-hour mammoth movie, but the last 30 minutes are interesting - at least as a predecessor of Cinerama. --Janke | Talk 07:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- comment Translations qualify for copyright. Do we know their status here?©Geni (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- From what I can tell, the American Film Institute provided English intertitles for the restoration. The film's U.S. (and UK) release came in 1928, so the English-language sources for the translated intertitle text would also be public domain now. hinnk (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Take in consideration that the 1928 US and UK release versions had different lenghts (the US version, at less than 2 hours, was shorter and had it's intertitles rewritten by MGM). --Mayimbú (talk) 07:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- That might explain it then. Brownlow describes having collected prior footage with some of the English intertitles and then AFI stepping in to provide the rest, with the BFI National Film Archive later reshooting them to standardize their appearance. It sounds like intertitles from the different English-language versions got combined. hinnk (talk) 08:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Take in consideration that the 1928 US and UK release versions had different lenghts (the US version, at less than 2 hours, was shorter and had it's intertitles rewritten by MGM). --Mayimbú (talk) 07:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- From what I can tell, the American Film Institute provided English intertitles for the restoration. The film's U.S. (and UK) release came in 1928, so the English-language sources for the translated intertitle text would also be public domain now. hinnk (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Carlosmarkos2345 | Talk 20:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support - The quality is good, despite the age of the film. The vintage look has somehow been retained without compromising on the quality. I've never voted in featured picture nominations, so I might not be qualified enough to speak on the technical aspects important here at FPCs, but I still think the nom deserves a support. Matarisvan (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Napoléon (1927).webm --Armbrust The Homunculus 03:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 08:17:16 (UTC)
- Reason
- Passes criteria 1 (if it passes it slightly, it can be excepted for unique images, since it pictures a rare-and-historical landmark). It passes 2, 3, and 4. It also passes 5 (see criteria 1 reason), slightly passes 6 (I can try to get a picture of the plaque, which states this), 7, and 8.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Borongan
- FP category for this image
- Category:Borongan
- Creator
- TheNuggeteer
- Support as nominator –
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
08:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC) - Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. Lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 12:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose — Regardless of the landmark's significance, this image is blurry and has blown highlights. Moonreach (talk) 13:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Do you think I should create another one?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
13:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)- Honestly, I think it would be difficult to shoot a captivating image of this subject. --Janke | Talk 13:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
I think we've seen this one before. -- Sca (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)- What makes you say that?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
01:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)- Sorry, guess I confused it with something else. -- Sca (talk) 13:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- What makes you say that?
- I have another good picture of this school (in my old phone which I sometimes take), I feel like I should upload it, how about you?
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
02:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I think it would be difficult to shoot a captivating image of this subject. --Janke | Talk 13:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Do you think I should create another one?
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 09:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 17:25:59 (UTC)
- Reason
- Full disclosure: I'm not sure the skintones are perfect, but that's typical of photographs of the time. In photographs of him in crowds he doesn't appear to be so dark-skinned that I'd consider this entirely misleading, and this article describes him as a "light-skinned mulatto" - I presume that last term is much more acceptable in Brazil. Still, at least to modern eyes, it's probably lightening his skin at least a little bit. They tended to put a lot of light on the faces of dark skinned individuals to try and pull more detail since the film of the time lacked good differentiation of darker colours (and probably for racist reasons as well).
- That disclosure and the problems noted therein aside, for the time, this is quite a good photo. I did tweak levels to make it as unmisleading as possible. But I do believe that one should be honest about any flaws in the image when nominating.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Machado de Assis
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
- Creator
- Marc Ferrez, restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 17:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment — I see what I think is macroblocking in the mid-tones of the face. Apart from that I would be inclined to vote support; the other flaws I see are minor and derive from the photo's historical nature. Moonreach (talk) 17:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Moonreach: Think I got the worst of it: There was some weird damage - possibly historical retouching. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 07:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- It does indeed look better. I'll say support. Thanks for doing that. Moonreach (talk) 14:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Moonreach: Think I got the worst of it: There was some weird damage - possibly historical retouching. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 07:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support - I'm not crazy about the composition, but given that this is an historic photograph, the framing can be excused. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Yann (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Machado de Assis by Marc Ferrez.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 18:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 12:17:32 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image. FP on Commons. This is the photo’s 3rd nomination (the second by me). It got four support votes on both its first nomination and second nomination.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Viperine water snake
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 12:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful background, and a good shot of the snake in its natural environment. While one might like more details, long ropey lads are hard to get fully into a shot, so that's more of a reason to have a second FP focusing on the snake's scale patterns than an objection to this one. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 10:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support but with a comment: a bit of oversharpening on its head, by the looks of things. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – third time's the charm ―Howard • 🌽33 19:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Viperine water snake (Natrix maura).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 11:35:27 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality large image of species endemic to the Cayman Islands. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Cayman curly-tailed lizard
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 12:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really nice work! Don't suppose you also got a shot of that intriguing bright red insect ( or is that just a leaf/flower?) Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 10:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- I try not to miss the little bugs. This one is a nymph. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pretty! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 17:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I try not to miss the little bugs. This one is a nymph. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Cayman curly-tailed lizard (Leiocephalus varius).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 11:58:12 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image. FP on Commons. Received four positive and one negative vote on previous nomination
- Articles in which this image appears
- Malabar pied hornbill
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Charlesjsharp
- Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support - a bit on the small side, but given the difficulties of catching a subject in flight from this angle, I think it's fine. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – looks okay for me ZZZ'S 23:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 17:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Malabar pied hornbill (Anthracoceros coronatus) female in flight.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 12:00:42 (UTC)
- Reason
- A good scan of the original photographic negative at MIT museum. interesting photo. high EV for the article it's in.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Milk Drop Coronet, List of photographs considered the most important
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
- Creator
- Harold Eugene Edgerton
- Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽33 12:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Notable photo. Ok quality for an innovative photo in 1957. The file size 731 KB is small, but I doubt a larger file size would make any difference in this case. Bammesk (talk) 13:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Aye. I'm not seeing enough JPEG artefacting to distract from, well, the film grain. Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 19:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Simply iconic! --Janke | Talk 16:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Moonreach (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 17:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Milk Drop Coronet, 1957.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 12:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 11:04:01 (UTC)
-
Female
-
Male
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline images.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Smerinthus ocellatus
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
- Creator
- Ivar Leidus
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Support– ZZZ'S 14:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)- Changing vote to Oppose per Janke --ZZZ'S 02:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose due to the very harsh shadows. (Light comes from different sides of male & female - why?) --Janke | Talk 17:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I presume because they aren't literally next to each other in reality. I do think it looks almost more like black - well the term's setae, but let's call it fur for ease of understanding - on their abdomen. Which is bad, but I think it's also forgivable. Support. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 10:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Those dark areas are shadows, not black fur. This can cause a misconception if you're not familiar with the insect, so it lessens the EV. (You can also see the sharp shadows of the wing edges.) --Janke | Talk 07:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- I presume because they aren't literally next to each other in reality. I do think it looks almost more like black - well the term's setae, but let's call it fur for ease of understanding - on their abdomen. Which is bad, but I think it's also forgivable. Support. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.9% of all FPs. 10:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 10:54:52 (UTC)
- Reason
- Unanimously featured on Commons in April. Headline image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Palm warbler
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Rhododendrites
- Support as nominator – MER-C 10:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – ZZZ'S 14:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support too small really, but it's a nice shot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Palm warbler (41597).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 10:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Suspended nominations
[edit]This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.