Talk:Rugrats
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rugrats article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about any rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about any rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics at the Reference desk. |
![]() | Rugrats was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move 24 March 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus that the 1991 series remains the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
– There is a 2021 TV series called "Rugrats" (which already has a page), so the new primary topic appears to be the franchise and not the 1991 TV show 134.199.113.124 (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, OP presents no evidence to support his/her case. The original series appears to be the primary topic, both by pageviews and long-term notability. 162 etc. (talk) 01:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Unrelated, but you know you can just use "their" instead of "his/her" when you don't know someone's gender, btw. It's not ungrammatical at all; English has been using the singular 'they' since the 1300s in sentences like "Someone left their umbrella. I'll try to find them but I don't know where they went." Paintspot Infez (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Similar to SpongeBob SquarePants with SpongeBob SquarePants (franchise) and Avatar: The Last Airbender with Avatar: The Last Airbender (franchise), there's really no point of a move. kpgamingz (rant me) 17:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support 1st oppose 2nd, move the DAB to the base name as no primary topic given the generic use. The 1991 one has 31,802 views, the 2021 one has 17,814, the film series has 1,220, the franchise has 764, the comic strip has 130, the band has 17 and Toddler has 14,114. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. The original show is still the apex of the franchise, so there'd be no real point in a move unless the reboot lasts for years and years (not very likely). And anyway, as of right now, Rugrats (franchise) is mostly just a list of content already described at Rugrats#Franchise, so it's not like swapping the pages around would really improve things. Nohomersryan (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per all above. The 1991 show is clearly the most relevant topic. Svartner (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with all aboveFan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
End date
[edit]Rugrats tales from the crib three jacks and a beanstock aired on TV in November 2006 shouldn’t this count as the final episode since it was a special 2600:1008:B1AE:2E29:9DA6:64C:1E65:2278 (talk) 07:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class television articles
- Mid-importance television articles
- C-Class Nickelodeon articles
- Top-importance Nickelodeon articles
- Nickelodeon task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American animation articles
- High-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- C-Class American television articles
- High-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Animation articles
- High-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of High-importance
- C-Class Animated television articles
- High-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class BBC articles
- Low-importance BBC articles
- WikiProject BBC articles