Jump to content

Talk:David Chernushenko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/David Chernushenko. dbenbenn | talk 14:21, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Specific objections

[edit]

The Citizen has a right of centre editorial policy and mainly endorsed Conservative candidates. Their endorsement was widely seen as a move to split the NDP vote rather than a sincere vote of confidence in Chernushenko.

This may be true, but what evidence do you have? As it stands, it's only speculation. CJCurrie 02:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was however part of a general pattern of failure by that party to reach it's goals in 2006, compounded by negative publicity about leader James R. M. Harris and tactics in that election, which Chernushenko had very strongly supported, co-authoring with Lynette Tremblay and Andrew Lewis a "letter of support" that was widely derided as a "loyalty oath" (first by David Orton whose rejection was quickly picked up by others). It had praised the "dedicated staff" who many candidates objected to: a third of the candidates did not sign the oath.

"General pattern of failure" is POV -- as is "loyalty oath" for that matter. Also, there was no "widespread derision" of the letter, in the sense that most people have never heard of it. CJCurrie 02:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever their ethics, the tactics did not pay off in an substantially increased vote. Across Canada, the GPC vote stood at 4.5%, up only 0.2% from 2004 and far short of the promised "one million votes" and "several MPs" Harris had stated as his goals.

"Whatever their ethics" is obviously leading and unencyclopedic. CJCurrie 02:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chernushenko had also previously opposed the party's internal "revenue sharing" that sought to distribute public funds equitably to local branches of the party. This was a very controversial stance, as the sharing was eventually approved by an overwhelming majority of the members who lived in districts with their own branches of the Party.

Interesting comments. What proof do you have? CJCurrie 02:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though Chernushenko was widely rumoured to be considering seeking the leadership of the party, given his strong association with Harris and the staff, it seemed more likely that he would continue to support Harris, and unlikely that Chernushenko stood much chance of succeeding him. He had alienated Harris' opponents with the "loyalty oath" and support of a highly centralized party. As of February 2006 only Claude Genest had formally entered the race to succeed Harris.

This is entirely speculative. Also, there is no "race to succeed Harris" (a scheduled leadership challenge is not the same thing). CJCurrie 02:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

Added POV tag. Article reads like an ad and has various non-specific resume-like claims. Someone more familiar with the subject please add citations for resume claims, or remove them.

Edited out "Has traveled to Finland, Malaysia". His international flight itinerary is non-encyclopedic. Where he has travelled to is not important or relevant.Memahb 02:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations have been added. Reading like an ad isn't POV. Are there more specific concerns? Ardenn 02:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the citations, but the citation 2. doesn't go anywhere. Also, the fact that UNEP published a publication he wrote doesn't mean that he worked for them. Please also provide citations for him having worked for CIDA and DFAIT. No other concerns. Memahb 03:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Odd, citation 2 works fine for me. As for the UNEP, I'll see what I can find shortly. Ardenn 03:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David Chernushenko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on David Chernushenko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]