Jump to content

Talk:Inverse Laplace transform

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Significance?

[edit]

It would be cool if articles like this had a sentence or two explaining overall significance or use. I even have some math background and still don't know (or remember :-) ) why this is article-worthy. What about people who hit this by "random page"? BTW, who is Bromwich? Stan —Preceding undated comment added 23:30, 13 June 2003 (UTC).[reply]

Dutch article

[edit]

Hmm, I don't know Dutch, but the Dutch article is a lot m|ore informative. Maybe a Dutch speaker would like to volunteer to translate? Phys —Preceding undated comment added 20:20, 13 August 2003 (UTC).[reply]

Lacking in Content

[edit]

It's unfortunate that such a commonly used operation doesn't have a good Wikipedia entry. I'll start working on this page and hopefully add a section describing the inverse transform and the Bromwich integral in a clearer and more useful way. I'll also try to add a section on convolutions and the theta function too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmcastil (talkcontribs) 23:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose to merge Post's inversion formula into Inverse Laplace transform. The former article is just one of the multiple ways to invert a Laplace transform and since it is not so big, I think that it should be moved entirely to this article. Saung Tadashi (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 18:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]