Talk:Rosamund Clifford
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow
[edit]This article is an absolute horror. No primary sources are cited for anything. Legends, half-truths, and bald claims are profusely throughout, unquoted, and uncited. It's a maze of epic proportions and should be completely stricken and begun from scratch.Wjhonson (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Go on, then. 2.31.162.21 (talk) 19:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- The article as at 2013, and today. The main section that has appeared is a 'Rosamund in Fiction' section, a reference to Weir and some other academic texts have also appeared but many with no page numbers that make it an awful lot less useful. — aoyma3 (talk) 08:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class English royalty articles
- Unknown-importance English royalty articles
- WikiProject English Royalty articles