Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 121
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 49
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 74
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 19
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 177
Requested RD1 redactions 1
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 23
Open sockpuppet investigations 221
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 6
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 2
Other candidates 23
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This article covers an obviously highly controversial topic. The talk page even has a Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement template yet the article itself has no protection. ―Howard🌽33 21:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Note: I don't really see that this falls under said arbitration enforcement...it is broadly construed, but not that broadly, and you would have to go from Arab via Nazi to Israel which didn't exist as a state during the time the article mainly covers; I was bold an removed the template. Lectonar (talk) 07:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: WP:ARBPIA 69.118.230.235 (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

+1 Reason: ArbCom protection needed for PIA. Already a couple of reverts on the article. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced content by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 22:21, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Several reverts, including from non-EC editors, involving EC (Israel-Palestine conflict) articles and news topics. Needs ArbCom EC protection. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption from UK IP Special:Contributions/86.148.205.61. The named account User:Naiim Reid-Le Blanc was also involved at Maxïmo Park discography. Binksternet (talk) 02:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Per WP:PIA, non ecp editor changing the name of Israel Wiiformii (talk) 02:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The page is quite a hot topic in the US right now - I came from google to see what "DEI" actually meant and saw the page was recently vandalised and the talk page is quite heated. I've reverted the vandalism but I'd like to suggest locking the page to edits to prevent future vandalism. Pfych (talk) 02:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP addresses since 02:42, 16 July 2024‎, claiming Pyongyang as the site of the Olympics. Panian513 02:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP addresses since 02:33, 16 July 2024‎, making up various fictitious successor operating systems. Panian513 02:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumed IP-driven vandalism since the expiry of the last protection template on 04:34, 24 May 2024. Panian513 02:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs since 00:53, 4 March 2024‎. Same vandal as the one targeting Bids for the 2036 Summer Olympics, with same methods. Panian513 02:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from random IPs which could possibly come from the same person since 00:37, 1 April 2024 or 23:44, 15 June 2024‎. Unexplained removal of sources from IP user. Shout4Serenity (talk) 03:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Indef ECP, WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 03:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Indef ECP, WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 03:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 04:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Page Vandalism : Addition of unsourced content & page vandalized by IP users. . . Neon Grant (talk) 04:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: readdition of material despite warnings Magherbin (talk) 04:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 06:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: persistent disruptive editing Jadnjdas (talk) 10:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 10:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: WP:PROFRINGE by various IPs. tgeorgescu (talk) 10:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent disruption. Sir Calculus (talk) 11:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism around group members and various other information Artistrelationstribl (talk) 11:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of disruptive editing, done by related IP-s. Jingiby (talk) 12:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Charliehdb (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP hopper changing info despite reliable sources. (The subject identifies as lesbian, not pansexual.) ภץאคгöร 12:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection Reason: I highly recommend to add a protection page because a User:Orojackson56 vandalized the article and we want to not happen this again. Thank you very much for your consideration. Royiswariii (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to clarify this as it may lead to wrongful punishment for the user in question. The page in question was vandalized or disrupted by 176.138.82.188, 122.3.25.41, and 2001:fd8:5c1:f45b:edae:d912:ce04:dd42. Other editors, including @Orojackson56, reverted their disruptive edits. @Royiswariii might have misinterpreted Orojackson56's reversions in the page's edit history as vandalism. AstrooKaiTalk 13:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, @AstrooKai, for the clarification. I can confirm the vandalism was caused by the users mentioned above, who were altering the artists' names and discography. In response, I undid some of these edits. I wasn't entirely sure which version was the correct one prior to the vandalism, so it's possible that I may have inadvertently undone some of the edits made to revert the disruptions. However, my goal was to remove the vandalism altogether, and I monitored the page closely for the next few hours to ensure that no further vandalism occurred. Orojackson56 (talk) 13:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, @AstrooKai! I check on Revision History: bini (group) in July 24, 2024 at 5:39 pm i see the green highlights on reverting of @Orojackson56 I thought he back the “nonsense” edit. You can check on revision.
On the other hand, I sincerely apologized to you @Orojackson56 if I may misinterpreted your edit.
Thank you very much! (⁠◔⁠‿⁠◔⁠) Royiswariii (talk) 14:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and manipulation of the numbers into the article done by WP:SPA and IPs. Jingiby (talk) 12:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual edit warring to insert an unreliable source from an IP who has recently come off a block. — Czello (music) 12:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Someone is repeatedly adding a link to unofficial website in this Wiki Article. It is recommended to restrict edits to reputed Wikipedia accounts. Samuel Johnson (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


I wish to contest the following line in the article: "Cheatle also acknowledged that the Secret Service had rebuffed requests for additional resources for Trump's security detail in the two years leading up to the assassination attempt." First, this line has no footnotes to reference it's origin. Looking through the sites linked in the footnotes previous to this line and the line following it, nothing indicates the veracity of that statement. Instead, one can see lawmakers trying to infer this conclusion during her Congressional testimony regarding the attempted assassination of former President Trump, while she denies it. 2601:547:CA01:3C4E:8BC:6A39:2650:79D4 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done I have reworded those sentences to conform with the sources. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 07:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
sensitive situations.
+
sensitive situations. Nothing in this section empowers editors to enforce arbitration decisions.

This clarifies the ambiguity at Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_4#c-L235-2021-09-11T07:54:00.000Z-Ymblanter-2021-09-11T07:21:00.000Z and Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Extended_confirmed_restriction 142.113.140.146 (talk) 11:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Protected page text (request) 2024-07-24 18:26 Fully protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-01-01: "used in MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext and MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
19 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Infobox islands/length (request) 2024-07-10 14:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. An increase of edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:Sports color/baseball (request) 2024-07-10 18:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 30997 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Designation (request) 2024-07-13 19:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Unsubst-infobox (request) 2024-07-14 17:12 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2018-02-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Contentious topics/talk notice (request) 2024-07-15 08:15 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-16: "Highly visible template"
Template:Inflation/fn (request) 2024-07-15 08:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Music (request) 2024-07-16 15:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:College athlete recruit entry (request) 2024-07-18 14:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox person (request) 2024-07-19 00:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection"
Template:Copied (request) 2024-07-25 02:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions"
Template:Set index article (request) 2024-07-25 03:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-11-16: "Highly visible template"
Template:Country data Israel (request) 2024-07-25 07:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Wikibooks (request) 2024-07-25 08:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

There are no outstanding requests for account creator.

Account creator

[edit]
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
C1K98V, I've had a look at your last five articles. They are generally clean, if short. What makes you think, though, that cast lists don't need references? That appears to be a problem with every article that you produce. Schwede66 22:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you're doing well. Thank you for your feedback. I understand and value the importance of verifiability. I apologize to you for not including references in the cast section. I will fix my past creation. Moving forward, I will ensure doing the same. I assure you that you won't regret it. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Give me a ping, please, when you've done a few of your past pages. I shall take another look, C1K98V. Schwede66 05:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Schwede66 Sure, I will let you know once I fix my past creations. In the meantime, you can have a look at The Heist (2024 film), Let's Get Divorced and Bloody Ishq. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Schwede66, I tried to fix my last eleven articles as per your input. I would appreciate your feedback on the same. Thank you C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
 Done I've given autopatrolled for six months. Before that expires in January 2025, please come back here for another check in. Schwede66 19:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Schwede66, Sure. Thanks you. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 00:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Applying for the right as my edits were rationale. I have undergone all the criterions and I fit in all. I am well aware about Star Missispi and Joe Roe's earlier declines, but now I am fully washed and proved myself eligible for the right. From AFD/CSD to AfC reviews, and developing a handful of drafts for acceptance, I can now proudly say that I am eligible for the role. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 15:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
So what MusikBot? What's your problem?? Can't an user improved against AI bot like you? Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Uh.... that just auto replies showing recently declined requests. I'm really not sure what you think responding to the bot will do. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't believe I've ever declined a request from autopatrolled from you, Twinkle1990. You had the right revoked by Star Mississippi in June 2023 and subsequent requests for it were denied by Novem Linguae.[2] Hey man im josh,[3] and Rosguill.[4] That last time (two months ago) Rosguill told you it was more of a "never" than a "not now".  Not done and please do not ask again, it is becoming disruptive. – Joe (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
@Joe Roe you are an involved admin. Can you please left over to non-involved Admins? Why you are everywhere? User Maximilian Janisch treated you fine while you hammered his article and profile here. Kindly don't abuse you admin POWER. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) @Twinkle1990, observing this from the capacity as someone who is not an admin (but none the less a long-time editor), I'd suggest you may consider taking heed of Joe's advice and back away from this for a while (maybe until at least next year). I note in your rationale you consider yourself "suitable for the role", so one may wonder how well you understand what autopatrolled is (though I am sure you know it doesn't impact your editing ability). Bungle (talkcontribs) 16:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done If it helps your peace of mind, here's something from another admin. Schwede66 22:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
As far as I can see my only interactions with you to date have been to participate in the ANI thread that led to the revocation of your rights and decline your request for NPR four months ago. As I was acting in an administrative role both times, that doesn't make me involved. – Joe (talk) 07:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Good to see that ANI thread that was created by a Sock and commented by a few other sock users. No hard feeling. I won't apply again before 2006. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

For the record I previously declined a request with a similar reason. I will leave this one for another admin to evaluate. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Apologies, I was unaware that it was denied. I will do this manually instead. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 05:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Treating that as  Request withdrawn * Pppery * it has begun... 17:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving...  * Pppery * it has begun... 00:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Would be useful to make tedious edits. Un assiolo (talk) 22:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Anything specific in mind? * Pppery * it has begun... 00:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

I want to use the tool for making semi-automated edits such as fixing typos, sorting lists, and working with its other features. – The Sharpest Lives (💬✏️ℹ️) (ping me!) 17:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

@The Sharpest Lives:  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 00:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights:
I would like to use this bot for streamlining small typo fixes. My contributions in Moss/C and Moss/D are some vouches for my sincere work.
Thanks! Bunnypranav (talk) 14:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Does not meet the criteria listed in the header (500 mainspace edits or 250 non-automated mainspace edits). * Pppery * it has begun... 00:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Requests for file mover

File mover

[edit]

I would like to apply for the File mover right to rename files. I've been contributing on Commons for quite some time now, and I've been doing lots of good file renaming requests on Wikipedia. The file movers also appreciated my rename requests [5]. I'm a file mover and patroller on Commons, and I've moved over 1000 files so far. I have a good understanding of the renaming guideline, and I think it would be really helpful also having the right here. Thank you! Waqar💬 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 01:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\

 Done for a two-month trial. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 18:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Can I resubmit request or wait for approval ? SparrowQ (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process and notability guidelines to feel comfortable granting you the permission at this point in time. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Alternatively, you can apply to help out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? — 48JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@48JCL: As they should. The standard at acceptance at AfC is that the article would probably survive an AfD. Nothing more. Declining a draft for surmountable problems like a lack of citations or pretty much anything covered by a cleanup banner is inappropriate. – Joe (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I spot checked the 4 most recent accepts and they had lots of citations at time of acceptance. Feel free to link to the specific draft accepts you are concerned with. A complete lack of citations is a valid draftification reason and valid AFC decline reason, but I am not seeing that here. A major lack of citations such as entire paragraphs missing a citation (and also not supported by any WP:GENREFs) could be a valid decline reason (WP:V is policy after all). But it may also be reasonable to accept a draft that is mostly cited and just missing a couple citations, such as Draft:Norah Fulcher. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I see you found the IP at AfC who submits soundtrack articles (41 accepts of soundtracks it looks like). I'm glad to see you've started to accept drafts at AfC, instead of just declining (a ratio of 1 accepted to 348 declined at the time of the last application). I do still have concerns about your experience at AFD, given that, of your last 40 votes, all but 2 of them were pile on votes where the result had basically already been decided based on the number of votes for the conclusion you chose. You accepted one piece of criticism from me, your lack of accepts at AfC, but you do still appear to be pile on voting. Honestly, I'm not sold, but I'll leave it up to someone else whether they want to grant you a trial or not. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Applying for a trial period to show my ability as well as to reduce the backlog. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done, taking into account the simultaneously-filed autopatrol request (Special:Diff/1236045148#User:Twinkle1990), which raises concerns of excessive permissions requests, coupled with significant English errors and temperament issues. signed, Rosguill talk 16:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Rosguill please go per this diff. Denying admins are in massive trouble. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I think you have misappraised this situation. signed, Rosguill talk 16:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
How come it is Misappraisal while you cited a diff and in reply I gave you another diff? Confused?? Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
No hard feeling. I won't apply again before 2006. I would hope the NPP backlogs to be fastened. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

I would like to review some pages—particularly within Wikiprojects SCOTUS and Law. Also, I sometimes help autopatrolled users move drafts to mainspace over existing redirects via WP:RM/TR, and would like to be able to mark those as reviewed. (E.g., this one is yet to be reviewed.) SilverLocust 💬 21:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done for a two-month trial. Please re-apply roughly a week before the perm is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]


I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

I am requesting page mover rights to help close discussions at WP:RM, if a consensus is clear. – The Sharpest Lives (💬✏️ℹ️) (ping me!) 03:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done No experience in this area. You don't need page mover rights to close requested move discussions, you can either limit yourself to cases where there isn't a conflict, or request a move at WP:RMTR after closing. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

I am a registered user with more than 6 months of experience and more than 3000 edits, I moved a lot of pages and have created the Requested move for the page Danilo Guades. (I also don't have blocks). 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Zero edits to WP:RMTR = no demonstrated need for the right. You've moved a bunch of pages with no conflict, and you can keep doing that without this permission. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing.

Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

I watch recent changes often for vandalism and problematic edits, and understand the difference between the two when reverting them. I've also reviewed the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. I hope this right can help me more effectively perform anti-vandal work. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I am requesting pending changes review rights to improve my anti-vandalism work here on Wikipedia. I frequently revert instances of vandalism and am willing to assist with pending changes revisions. Thank you. doclys (❀) 14:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 13:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I think I could review pending changes every now and then while I'm doing antivandalism patrolling. I've not been as active recently as I wish I was, but I think I can help in some little ways. The Night Watch (talk) 10:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done of course :) Elli (talk | contribs) 13:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I regularly monitor the "recent change" feed now for about 2 months now, I actively warn users when I revert their edits thanks to twinkle and ultraviolet and actively report the clear vandals and spam accounts. I want to access the rollback rights to make reverting easier as I have slow internet. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I actively warn users who vandalize/disrupt the pages using Twinkle as well as report them to ARV either after final warning or when an account is clearly for vandalism only, but sometimes I assume good faith just leave a note on their talk page. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Ah yes you are correct, my apologies I'm not sure how I missed that.  Done -Fastily 00:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Very active in counter vandalism (very likely have over 1000 reverts at this point), have rollback on simple, do X wiki counter-vandalism as well. Think rollback would be helpful. Read and understood WP:Rollback and meet the guidelines above. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Given that your block for disruptive editing & edit warring expired just a month ago. I'd like to see you establish a track record of constructive contributions for at least several months before assigning you advanced permissions. -Fastily 00:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]

I have been contributing to Wikipedia for 14 years where I have made numerous edits to templates. When I've wanted to contribute to templates that were protected I have made edit requests which have been successful. I would love to be able to make these edits without the need to provide an edit request. I understand this would be a privilege which I would not abuse. As an editor I have never engaged in edit wars, vandalised any pages or been blocked (except for when I was contributing from a proxy IP which was not due to any actions by me). I believe I fulfil all bar one of the Standard Guidelines for a template editor, the only exception being number 5 as I have not contributed to a template sandbox. I am hoping that this does not affect my request and that my history on here and my willingness to help make my application successful.

A current project I am working on: Several flag templates have been recently moved in line with the proper naming convention of templates, however these have not all been updated within other templates creating a template redirect; I would like to contribute by updating templates used on templates to avoid that redirect. Thank you. 6ii9 (talk) 10:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 1
    Requests for unblock 125
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
    Candidates for speedy deletion 30
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 476
    Templates for deletion 188
    Categories for deletion 162
    Wikipedia files for discussion 48
    All redirects for discussion 252
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 38
    Possible copyright violations 30
    All articles proposed for deletion 131
    All files proposed for deletion 7
    Unsorted AfD debates 1
    All files with the same name on Commons 5
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 338
    Unknown copyright status 29
    Unknown source 18
    No non-free use rationale 2
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 6

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,219
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 443
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,558
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,377 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 5,759 0.08
    All articles needing expert attention 1,297 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 38,653 0.56

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 10,811 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 521,893 7.61
    All articles lacking sources 85,692 1.25
    All unreferenced BLPs 793 0.07
    All articles needing additional references 460,052 6.71
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,386 0.06
    All articles lacking in-text citations 104,832 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 300,795 4.39

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 138 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 21 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,851 0.03
    All articles to be split 795 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 2 -
    Stub categories 19,215 -
    All uncategorized pages 791 0.01
    All orphaned articles 56,577 0.83
    All articles needing copy edit 2,915 0.04
    All articles with style issues 19,530 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,736 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,546 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 246
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,627
    All accuracy disputes 15,694
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 3
    All articles to be expanded 66,146

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.