Talk:RSA Factoring Challenge
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RSA Factoring Challenge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Archive page created with older discussions from before 2010
[edit]Following the manual process on H:ARC, I created a new archive page for this Talk page and moved all the older discussions from before 2010, as well as an external links modified section from 2017. - Dyork (talk) 19:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Question - should RSA-129 be removed from the table?
[edit]Question for other editors - should the entry for RSA-129 be removed from the table? As the note on the entry indicates: "RSA-129 was not part of the RSA Factoring Challenge, but was related to a column by Martin Gardner in Scientific American". If it had nothing to do with the "RSA Factoring Challenge", why are we including it.. other than to have it in a list of RSA numbers that have been factored?
I note that RSA-129 is included in the RSA numbers article, which I think is fine. But I don't think it should be here in THIS article as it was not actually part of the "challenge".
My recommendation would be to delete the entry for RSA-129. Comments from any other editors? - Dyork (talk) 20:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the RSA Factoring Challenge page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "RSA Factoring Challenge" page.