Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

29 August 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< August 28	August 30 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Am I Racist?

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to have proven notability aside from that Matt Walsh is involved. Only two references, both from the same website which is a social media aggregate and may not itself meet the criteria of a reliable source (and should probably carry a bias warning as owned by a conservative Christian broadcasting corporation, with the promo code Libtard to get 50% off to give you an idea). DarkeruTomoe (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DarkeruTomoe (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IV.AI

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous instance was deleted at AfD in 2018. This new instance is sourced to generic references about AI but I am not seeing the specific references about this company which would be needed to demonstrate that notability has now been attained. AllyD (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, again, not notable. I hope it's not paid editing. The creator of the previously deleted version, Banassac, was indeffed for promotional editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:SIRS Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acronical place

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure astrology term, WP:NOTDICT. Two of the three references are on the word "acronical", one of which is a blog. Un assiolo (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astrology-related deletion discussions. Un assiolo (talk) 14:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment can we just have a Glossary of astrology or something? You can't say a lot about a lot of these things but the terms themselves are discussed and it would be helpful for trying to sort out what is what in the sea of new age nonsense. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that. Mrfoogles (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

West Bengal Centralised Admission Portal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significance. It's just an admission portal. The article doesn't appear to be significant enough. Thewikizoomer (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Websites, and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback on the article about the "West Bengal Centralised Admission Portal. I believe the portal plays a significant role in modernizing the admission process for government colleges in West Bengal. It ensures greater transparency, accessibility, and efficiency for thousands of students annually. Additionally, the portal has received considerable recognition from government and media sources, highlighting its transformative impact on the state's education system. I will enhance the article with additional citations and details to better reflect its importance.

Also same type of articles exist on the Wikipedia

Sistema de Seleção Unificada

Common Application Arijit Kisku (talk) 16:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It lacks notability, no major significance of the subject, Common App is very popular and one of the only ways to apply in the US, this portal doesn't have that notability. Xoocit (talk) 23:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The West Bengal Centralised Admission Portal is a crucial government initiative that facilitates admissions to over 460 government and government-aided colleges in the state, serving more than 5.2 lakh students annually. The portal's impact has been widely covered by reliable newspapers like The Telegraph India and others, further establishing its importance in West Bengal's education system. While not globally known like the Common App, it plays a transformative role regionally, making it notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia.

Arijit Kisku (talk) 19:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It might serve a specialized purpose, but is not notable. Many countries have specialized national admission arrangements. ~~

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, please sign your comments so we can see who you are.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bread and Roses (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for dubious notability 9 years ago. I am unable to find reviews of this band, which did not have a large output either. Found this, but it's not a reliable source for a review. Geschichte (talk) 09:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent, reliable sources found to demonstrate significant coverage as proof of notability. Even if you make a Google search of "Bread and Roses band" you can't find enough referecences as the result is a mixture of other entities named Bread and Roses. Prof.PMarini (talk) 01:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Axel Meise

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are about the company; fails to meet WPANYBIO; COI (created by the employee - see the name of the author). BoraVoro (talk) 14:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 15:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

maybe to draftify? BoraVoro (talk) 11:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A conflict of interest is not a valid reason for deletion. While some cited sources are about the company, the article also cites multiple good sources that discuss the subject in detail, for example AW Architektur & Wohnen (footnote 1), Die Welt (footnote 4), or Handelsblatt (footnote 12). Also, I think that the article meets WP:ANYBIO #1. Meise has receieved well-known awards, which the article demonstrates. --88.20.56.144 (talk) 12:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. Not enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. The welt.de is the only source that may pass as proof of notability at this time; awmagazin.de is somehow local, industry-related; handelsblatt.com is mixed with an interview, so might not be enoguh proof of notaility. Even counting, handelsblatt.com, that makes for only 2 sources. The other sources that appear through an online search have not been used/cited in Wikipedia, so their independence/reliability is not yet established, i.e., may not be enough to prove WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Prof.PMarini (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. No consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HN R200

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very small company that only produced three examples of a car. No evidence of significant notability, not everything belongs on Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blitzworld Buggies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very small car kits company which has only produced ~250. No independent indication of notability. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Transportation. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adam's Buggies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable company that has only created 15 kits. No significant coverage to demonstrate notability. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, Transportation, and United Kingdom. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shekar Natarajan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo article. Fails WP:BIO. Refs are mostly interviews and profiles. No indication of being notable. scope_creep^Talk 07:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Shellwood (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crendon Replicas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of too many articles created by the same editor. I cannot see a company that has produced about 100 car kits as notable. No significant sources provided, I do not consider trade lists as proving notability. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

V The Serial

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 07:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Shellwood (talk) 09:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography of Gilbert Hegemier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As the title says, this is a list of an academics articles. If he was a nobel laureate then perhaps one is appropriate. He is not, just a routine academic who may not pass WP:NPROF. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Environment. Ldm1954 (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Not suitable for Wikipedia. It does not provide a free web hosting service. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. We might maintain this sort of list for someone whose name is known to all, such as List of scientific publications by Albert Einstein. For someone who passes our notability standards for academics but is not really famous, no. We should at best keep a handful of selected publications, those that have been particularly heavily cited or are themselves the subject of in-depth publications like others (like books with published book reviews), as a subsection of the main biography. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I basically agree with David Eppstein. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anastas Kristo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure of WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Very low-key career, played some games in Malta. The stints in Italy and Scotland were negligible, if he even played at all. Are there sources? There are stat databases, passing mentions. This is from a union he belongs to, so a primary source. Then there are some post-football, not-so-favourable coverage, which is at the same time far from meeting WP:PERP. Geschichte (talk) 06:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indrit Hithi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure of WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. 5 minutes in Albania's highest league and some seasons with very limited playing time in the semi-pro second tier where match attendance is in the hundreds. As for sources, I only found stat databases, Facebook posts, and short non-significant coverage such as this and this. Geschichte (talk) 06:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flavio Geisshuesler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A lot of the sources are merely authored by himself or primary sources from institutions where he has worked. Fails WP:PROF, a low citation count at 37 in Google scholar. LibStar (talk) 06:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Switzerland, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 06:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He has published stuff, but citations to it are tiny. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. I agree with above. Bduke (talk) 08:26, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, regrettably. Religious studies is not a high-citation field, but I was unable to find any reviews of his books, either. Maybe this could be revisited in a few years. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The cited sources are two press releases (Sylheter Dak and Daily Jalalabad), a list of the ~60 schools operated by the army, a job posting, and the school website. Searches in English and Bengali found a few primary source breaking news stories, generally of the form "so-and-so, a student at Jalalabad Cantonment English School and College",[1] but no independent, secondary sources containing significant coverage of the school itself. Therefore does not meet WP:NSCHOOL and should not be a stand alone article. Worldbruce (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. Worldbruce (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce Seriously? No independent sources or secondary containing significant coverage? Look again and see the citations and what should i attempt to do. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dark rock

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A redirect to goth rock was reverted. There do not seem to be any sources proving this meets the GNG, the article is full of WP:OR and what little sources do mention this term mention it in passing as an alternative term and do not describe it in detail. Nothing discussing this as an actual "genre" in depth. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arie Hershcovich

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find independent sources with significant coverage suitable to meet WP:NBASIC, and I cannot find evidence to pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPROF. I have looked under both the article name and "Arie Hershkowitz", the name given on the CV in reference 1. Mgp28 (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politics, and Israel. Mgp28 (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bibhuprasad Mohapatra

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply fails WP:GNG a before shows no independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 07:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and India. Theroadislong (talk) 07:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No secondary independent reliable sources on the page. All the references are publications written by the subject. Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. RangersRus (talk) 21:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zoë Paul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ARTIST. No awards or recognition. Created by a single purpose editor so possible promo. Sources provided merely confirm where she has exhibited and not SIGCOV. This source seems to be the only indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Visual arts, South Africa, and Greece. LibStar (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asasey Hotel attack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT no lasting coverage. Cannot find any coverage of the event after July except for trivial one line mentions in articles discussing other attacks. Closest thing I could find was this: https://www.kormeeraha.com/2021/03/12/canadian-school-renamed-after-hodan-nalayeh/ but it is about a victim more than the attack.

Unfortunately hotel attacks are a common incident in Somalia and just aren't very notable. Could be merged into Hodan Nalayeh, al-Shabaab, or the Somali civil war Traumnovelle (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Terrorism and Somalia. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to 2019 timeline of the Somali Civil War. Or redirect, it's already mentioned there. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and do not merge. Hotel attacks are not a common incident in Somalia just as school shootings are not in the United States, despite what is suggested from news coverage. An attack in which 25+ people are killed is not WP:ROUTINE and there was international news coverage of the attack in global RS including FT, NYT, CNN, AP, BBC, Reuters, etc. More than enough coverage to establish WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:DEPTH, and WP:GNG for WP:NEVENT. Longhornsg (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longhornsg But not WP:SUSTAINED which is one of the more important aspects in WP:NEVENT. There is nothing after a month. Death toll is not notability, plenty of even higher casualty attacks are not notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Three participants and three different outcomes proposed, the definition of No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have no issue with merging to the timeline article. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources brought up. @PARAKANYAA:: articles are not required to meet GNG and every applicable SNG but GNG or any applicable SNG. This doesn't have lasting consequences, but it does have plenty of coverage in reliable sources.Alien333 ( what I did
why I did it wrong ) 21:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per replies: I'd forgotten about the whole For Wikipedia's purposes, breaking news stories are also considered to be primary sources bit. — Alien333 ( what I did[reply]
why I did it wrong ) 16:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GNG states sources should be secondary. All the sourcing appears to be primary sourcing. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alien333 That is not what NEVENT is. NEVENT is meant to distinguish/help to distinguish events that may suffer from WP:PRIMARYNEWS (since, initially, that's going to be all of the sources). All of the sources here are primary and therefore none contribute to GNG. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By your logic, every single passing events that blows up in the media for two days has "plenty of coverage in reliable sources"; but we clearly don't have an article on every crime that's ever happened. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is just a news story. There is no long-term coverage in secondary sources. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources found by Longhornsg are all from the time of the event. No WP:LASTING effect to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: User:PARAKANYAA, you have voiced other opinions here. Are you no longer arguing for a Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am still arguing for a merge/redirect since it's part of the greater event and was discussed within that context. I do not think it is notable outside of that. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frutiger Aero

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was nominated for deletion by User:Seocwen. Di (they-them) (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article is in good condition, has plenty of sources, and passes GNG. I do not think there's any reason to delete it. Di (they-them) (talk) 05:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 August 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Appears to be plenty of sources and I'd like to see how this article develops. StewdioMACK (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Some of the sources are a bit lower-quality than I'd like, but that's no reason to delete the article. It passes GNG like Di said, exemplified by its mention in The Guardian (even if they did mischaracterize it as a screensaver style). Bowler the Carmine | talk 07:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet. Shellwood (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole and Natalie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM DonaldD23 talk to me 02:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Music, and United States of America. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep. In the span of a few minutes, I was able to find reviews from Pitchfork and Fact (UK magazine) ([2], [3]). And there are probably more reviews than that, might look later. toweli (talk) 02:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but Clean Up - The article needs to be improved by adding sources and removing a lot of fancruft, but it received a few reliable reviews in Pitchfork (found by previous voter) and occasional hip-hop publications (e.g. [4]). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article is not WP:Notable. It seems to have gotten sparing citations in law journals (though far less often than it did nearly 100 years ago) and it seems like it's sometime taught in law schools (though I certainly don't remember learning about it) but that's it. The format is also very much not the standard for court cases on Wikipedia. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Covered briefly under various tort law books in Gbooks and Scholar, but most are snippets and only briefly mention this. I don't see notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This seems notable in law. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co. is related to this case and links two articles comparing the two. The original author, Agradman, wrote on the talk page, "This case (ash v. childs) was very important about determining whether injuries like this needed to be resolved in tort versus contract." I think there is probably going to be coverage in some legal textbooks somewhere because searching for "Ash v. Childs" gets a lot of hits for study guides and homework help. The page is formatted like it's straight from someone's class notes, but the subject seems to be mentioned and discussed enough to be notable. A quick search turns up:

A big focus of: 24 Tul. L. Rev. 66 (1949-1950) Theory of a Case in Louisiana
One paragraph comparison: The Progress of the Law, 1918-1919 Civil Procedure (1919)
One paragraph: [The Theory of the Pleadings in Code States (1922)
One paragraph: The Law in Business Problems (1921)
One paragraph: TORTS - NEGLIGENCE - RES IPSA LOQUITUR AS APPLIED TO FOREIGN MATTER IN FOODS FOREIGN MATTER IN FOODS (1932)
A paragraph in a note: A Note on the Civil Remedies of Injured Consumers (1933)
Discussed in: Sales: Liability for the Presence of Mice and Other Uncommon Things in FoodThings in Food (1919)
Mentioned and cited: Sales. Warranties. Implied Warranty by Restaurateur of Wholesomeness of Food (1919)
Cite in footnotes: Implied Warranties of Wholesomeness again (1920)
Cited in footnote: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/molr31&div=25&id=&page=
Cited in footnotes: A Note on the Civil Remedies of Injured Consumers (1933)
Cited in footnote: Res Ipsa Loquitur: Its Nature and Effect (1935)
Cited in footnote: What is "Fit to Eat" -- The Reasonable Expectation Test (1968)

Also, would someone notify Wikipedia:WikiProject Law? I don't want to come off as canvassing since I'm writing a !vote. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 02:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies GNG with significant coverage in books and periodicals in Google Books, Google Scholar and elsewhere. There is a body of literature on the law relating to "unwholesome" food (as some if the sources call it). That is the parent topic of which this decision is an indispensible part. James500 (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per James500 and Wcquidditch, and WP:HEY, although I would prefer that someone add in the citations found to the article. Bearian (talk) 03:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll do some research on this tonight and tomorrow afternoon. I've found some things just need a little time to put it together. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mala Ciganlija

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mainly uncited and seemingly vandalised. Perhaps it could be merged in to create a "neighborhoods of Belgrade" article, as, seemingly after 7+ years being marked with onesource, it still remains with only one source. NeoJade ^{( Talk | Contribs )} • she/they 01:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. NeoJade ^{( Talk | Contribs )} • she/they 01:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep + we need more sources. — Sadko (words are wind) 13:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Боки ☎ ✎ 23:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - After a little more reading, I think this may not even pass WP:GNG, searching for the town has on several occasions not brought any results for me. I am still of the belief a merge with a more general "Neighborhoods of Belgrade" could be and should be the way forward as it allows this article to still exist as a redirect, therefore not affecting anything that links here, and also allows for bigger and smaller towns to be on Wikipedia as the neighborhoods are notable as a group, yet probably not individually.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asif Iqbal Memon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Subject does not seem to be notable enough for a standalone article, and coverage from reliable sources is clearly lacking. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. 4 sources on the page and not any of them have indepth coverage on the subject. Sources are either about infamous Iqbal Mirchi or WP:ROUTINE news on Enforcement Directorate trying to declare Iqbal Mirchi's family as fugitive economic offenders. RangersRus (talk) 21:57, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tumor alopecia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one source that talks about tumor alopecia and it only includes one small paragraph on the topic:

"Tumor alopecia refers to halr loss in the immediate vicinity of either benlgn or malignant tumors of the scalp. Synngomas, nerve sheath myxomas, and steatocystoma multiplex are benign tumors that may be lim~ted to the scalp and cause alopecia. Alopecia neoplastica 1s the designation glven to halr loss from metastatic tumors, most often from breast or renal carcinoma."^[1]

^ James, William D.; Berger, Timothy G.; Elston, Dirk M.; Odom, Richard B. (2006). Andrews' diseases of the skin: clinical dermatology. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier. p. 762. ISBN 0-7216-2921-0. OCLC 62736861.

The source provided is a tertiary source I believe so this doesn't have any secondary sources covering it. Also this page reads like a dictionary definition. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 04:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath, a medical school textbook (which is what's cited there) is generally considered an ideal source in MEDRS terms.

I also wonder whether you're focusing too closely on the exact name given in that one source, when the subject (i.e., hair loss in the immediate vicinity of either benign or malignant tumors of the scalp) might have other names. One of the two sources in ==Further reading== on that page talks about "neoplasm-related alopecia" and the other is about "Alopecia due to cancer". This review calls it "Hair loss in neoplastic conditions".

It would be undesirable to delete an article about a whole subject if what it really needs is to WP:MOVE it to a different title and add some more content. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I read over general notability guidelines and saw secondary sources and I think I may have focused too much on that. I was the one that added the further reading sources in an earlier search for some material on the topic. While the original source does distinguish tumor alopecia from Alopecia neoplastica would it be appropriate to merge the pages? I was able to expand the page Alopecia neoplastica a bit. Or possibly mention tumor alopecia on the page Alopecia and redirect there? I will search for literature regarding tumor related alopecia that’s not referred to by that name. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Backdoor.Win32.Seed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable trojan, a WP:BEFORE search yielded no non-listical sources. Sohom (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Internet, and Software. Sohom (talk) 04:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bolgimo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable worm, a WP:BEFORE search yielded no non-listical sources. Sohom (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Sohom (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bohmini.A

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no non-listical credible RS found on WP:BEFORE. Seems non-notable Sohom (talk) 03:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Sohom (talk) 03:45, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kimia Alizadeh vs Nahid Kiani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article attempts to be a WP:SPINOFF from Taekwondo at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 57 kg but nothing that is mentioned here cannot be there. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Martial arts, Olympics, Iran, and Bulgaria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've added content and WP:RS that supports the article. This article is specific to not only an event within Taekwondo at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 57 kg, but also the prior tournament, the background and events surrounding the bout including the censorship, as well as reactions. Having all of this information placed within the Taekwondo at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 57 kg article is unbefitting and WP:UNDUE.--Ronnnaldo7 (talk) 21:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources available are enough to have notability. As with any highly trending event at the Olympics, they should have their own article. Ahri Boy (talk) 02:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary WP:CFORK. The match is not worthy of a standalone page and the info can be easily be added in the header of [Taekwondo at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 57 kg]. Lekkha Moun (talk) 18:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As stated above, it would be WP:UNDUE to redirect/delete it as the article isn't just about the match, but also includes the prior match, the reactions, aftermath, censorship, etc., and the article is noteworthy with WP:RS.--Ronnnaldo7 (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unnecessary WP:CFORK, all of the content can be covered adequately elsewhere. Of the text in the article:

The fact that it's a rematch of a 2020 match is somewhat trivial
Kiani won the silver medal, the latter being the first for an Iranian woman at the Olympics, surpassing Alizadeh's 2016 bronze feat can be mentioned at her article and/or Iran at the 2024 Summer Olympics
While Kiani competed for the Iranian team, Alizadeh competed for the Bulgarian team after having represented the Refugee Olympic Team at the 2020 Summer Olympics, and Iran at the 2016 Summer Olympics where she became the first Iranian female medalist at the Olympics. can be covered in Kiani's article and the relevant "Team X at the Y Summer Olympics" articles.
Alizadeh became Bulgaria's first-ever taekwondo competitor at the Olympics, and won Bulgaria's first medal in Olympic taekwondo can be mentioned at Bulgaria at the 2024 Summer Olympics.
"Aftermath" section can be mentioned in either the event article, this can be added to Concerns and controversies at the 2024 Summer Olympics.

In summary, none of this content needs a separate spinoff article for one match. And there is no one sensible merge target. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Excellent summation by Joseph2302. I do believe this does not deserve its own WP article as is seems like WP:NOTNEWS. I do think there's material there that can be put into existing articles--especially since they're both individually notable. I'm just not sure where the best fit is for all the information. Papaursa (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 02:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the Edge (Andy Duguid album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM DonaldD23 talk to me 23:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Germany, and Scotland. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I didn't find any coverage or reviews in reliable sources. I'm not sure if Andy Duguid himself is even notable. toweli (talk) 02:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(I'm not opposed to a redirect.) toweli (talk) 17:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Can someone please enlighten me why articles need to be deleted in the first place? This is a 4KB article with fewer than 40 edits containing a 89KB work of art. Will WP become better-off without it? Speaking of this "notability" principle: media normally ignores less known artists, thus even the best/better albums in terms of music, style, arrangement, etc. may be ignored completely because their artists are not promoted enough. WP contains a ton of info on Calvin Harris whose music is absolutely bland electronic beats with no soul, finesse, nothing and who is going to be completely forgotten 10 years from now. Yet, "notable", right? There are literally hundreds of thousands of article in need of improvement and you're chasing articles to delete? Whoa. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your requested explanation: Deleting articles about things that don't qualify for them is longstanding Wikipedia policy that the user community has developed for years and years. See WP:NALBUM for this debate and WP:N for general principles. For Calvin Harris, see WP:OTHERSTUFF. For other articles that need improvement, this is a volunteer community waiting for someone like you to improve them. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Andy Duguid: found zero evidence of notability. Redirecting to artist is standard if the artist has an article, and if said artist is also non-notable as toweli suggests then it can be challenged in a separate AfD. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Andy Duguid - I can find no professional reviews or other specific coverage about the album in the reliable media sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:NOTDATABASE: “Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information”, it should not be a discography database such as Discogs, Musicbrainz, etc. WP:GNG should always be followed. When the album doesn’t meet the required notability, it shouldn’t have a standalone page. No significant coverage of the album by reliable independent sources could be found. Nihonjinatny (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the page of the albums creator Andy Duguid; I see no reason, and cannot find sufficient evidence, this album needs a standalone article. ResonantDis_tortion 19:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 02:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Andy Duguid. I can't find any notability for this album. Galaxybeing (talk) 03:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur Park (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet NBOOK. The book is also published under the title The Thirteenth Majestral. I have not been able to find any reviews for either title through JSTOR, Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, ProQuest, Newspaper Archive, or Google News. I didn't even find a book listing on ISFDB. I suggest redirecting to the the author, Hayword Peirce. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hayford Peirce. There's about a paragraph in the September 18 1994 issue of the Arizona Daily Star but it doesn't say all too much, not a "review" (just commenting on the name change and Jurassic Park stuff). There's also this which confuses me - is this giving commentary on a location in the book? I have no idea why it's namedropped. Included here but not sigcov. It was translated into Italian but I can't find any sources under the translated name either (L'impero dei dinosauri). PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Warr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:SPORTSCRIT. A search for sources in trove, google news and google books did not yield in depth third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 01:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 01:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Queensland first-class cricketers as a valid WP:ATD. In cases like this, speedy redirecting to "List of X cricketers" seems better than starting an AFD. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NCRYSTAL. Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it. Should be recreated closer to the election, once actual sources start discussing it.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and West Bengal. C F A 💬 16:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This should fall under WP:G4 as the last AFD on this (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election) was barely a few weeks ago, and the page is effectively identical, in terms of sourcing. I have tagged it for CSD instead. Soni (talk) 01:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has been 7 days without that G4, and an IP has already added sources definitely talking about the 2026 elections. Now I support Keeping the article because of said sources Soni (talk) 00:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Never transcluded
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Queen of Hearts (talk) 00:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basa Khonelidze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources with significant coverage. The best I find is some pages of statistics and mention that he scored in a particular game. Does not appear to meet WP:SPORTBASIC. Mgp28 (talk) 00:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Georgia (country). Mgp28 (talk) 00:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage by any secondary sources besides a passing mention in an article about a single game. cyberdog958^Talk 01:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[n378-1] James, William D.; Berger, Timothy G.; Elston, Dirk M.; Odom, Richard B. (2006). Andrews' diseases of the skin: clinical dermatology. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier. p. 762. ISBN 0-7216-2921-0. OCLC 62736861.

[1]