Jump to content

Talk:Phanes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

Is that really Roman Mithras, "the Bull-Slayer" (2nd cty BC -- 5th cty AD), or rather Persian Mithra of the Zoroastrian (before Christ)?
Jorge Stolfi 04:02, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

  • Regarding your question on whether Phanes is linked with the Persian Mitras or the Roman Mithras the current scholarly opinion seems to be that mitras wasn't the basis for Mithras, although given the Roman tactic of Syncretism it's possibly that they borrowed elements of him for their miThras - the Roman version is the one that makes him linked with the 'world egg', and certainly the persian version isn't linked with the sun (because of the Persian Ahura Mazda). Mithras is depicted emergng from the 'world' egg on the University of Newcastle website: found here

This stub is self-contradictory (How can Night (Nyx) be older than Phanes if Phanes is first born?) and does not correspond at all to the account given in the Orphic poems (see Guthrie's Orpheus and Greek Religion chapter iV). It should be completely rewritten using reliable sources. Eluard (talk) 05:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Placement of this article

[edit]

I see no discussion of the *direct* reference to "Greek mythology", although this is rather questionable. Phanes is no mythological figure. I would suggest to first link to Orpheus, 2. to Neoplatonism (important) and only in 3d place to mythology, or leave that out altogether. Obviously the lemma has to be expanded also. Bibh wkp 20:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources missing

[edit]

This article has no sources at all. ICE77 (talk) 19:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phanes (mythology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 April 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:59, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


– Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the name in terms of historical precedent. The other names were named after the deity. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

David Livingstone Is Not A Reputable Source

[edit]

To whom it may concern,

Found this article wanting to know more about Phanes, clicked on the citation to David Livingstone's "The Dying God," and with minimal digging found that Livingstone's books peddle anti-Semitic nonsense about how the course of history has secretly been manipulated for centuries by a shadowy group of sinister Kabbalists looking to take over the world. He's no "scholar," just a conspiracy theorist (his personal website is actually called "Conspiracy School," for crying out loud.) I'm deleting the citation to his work. Please be more careful.

Wescott06 (talk) 00:52, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]