Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

WP:AFD/Y

Purge page cache if page isn't updating.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< September 08	September 10 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Kim Jong-chol (footballer, born 1991)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Il-yong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Cameroon, Moscow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article merely confirms its address. Does not meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 23:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Cameroon, and Russia. LibStar (talk) 23:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RX J2129.7+0005 BCG

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I did find an arXiv paper, so there's at least some coverage.[1] The SIMBAD coverage is for RX J2129.7+0005. It doesn't appear eligible for a redirect to List of galaxy groups and clusters. Praemonitus (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Habben Michael

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is a mixture of unsourced BLP information and promotion. It was created in 2013 by an editor who only edited subjects linked to Teriy Keys/Smurfie Syco and was eventually blocked for a legal threat. I have searched online and not found any reliable sources: the online sources in the article are mostly dead. TSventon (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Television, Advertising, Fashion, Ethiopia, Kenya, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure. As a singer, she’s probably not notable. As a model or designer, it’s arguable. In any case, searches online don’t show a lot of reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian is/was she a singer? That is not mentioned in the article. Did you find any independent sources? I have looked again at the sources: three are not independent, the archived copy of the "Europa Star" article does not mention her, which leaves New York (magazine), which is inaccessible and not enough on its own. Oddly the article history shows the author trying to delete the article in 2015 due to "request from persons legal team" before being blocked for a legal threat. TSventon (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I chime in early in the AfD process, and it’s not a clear delete, and I’ve done at least some due diligence, then I usually just comment and ask questions. Let me think about this one. Bearian (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing with my online searches, which I’m sure you have already done, I see that she has an album on sale at Amazon, Spotify, Pandora, and other websites; she also has videos on YouTube. She registered her company, ROAD, in the UK. That’s about it; pages of Google hits are not reliable sources. I’m leaning now towards delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 14:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I do see various streaming sites, but nothing related to modelling. I don't see any kind of reliable sourcing we can use for an article. I'm not even sure the sources now in the article are helpful... Oaktree b (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Peter Park (poker player)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, no WP:SIGCOV. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no significant coverages added. Need to add more sources. Xegma(talk) 17:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More sources added + revised. PsychoticIncall (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Games, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Frank Funaro (poker player). The two tournaments mentioned in this article is basically the same as the one in the other article (Funaro) but lower level variants (sharing the same structure and format). PsychoticIncall (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge possibility.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Funaro (poker player)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, lacking WP:SIGCOV outside specialist poker websites. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Games, and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Neves (poker player)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, lacking WP:SIGCOV outside specialist poker websites. Does not appear to have won any notable, major tournaments. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Games, and Portugal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Alon9393 (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to hear from some experienced editors here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Santhosh Suvarna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, lacking WP:SIGCOV outside specialist poker websites. Does not appear to have won any notable, major tournaments. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Games, and Karnataka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Nagaland Post and the APN News are definately independant non-specialized sources. sportskeeda is specialized in sports but not specificially poker. PsychoticIncall (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JOJ WAU

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not notable. I could only find this: [2], [3], [4]. This probably does not constitute significant coverage. Janhrach (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Slovakia. Janhrach (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to TV JOJ. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am not sure about the merits of the proposed redirect as the article lists that target page (TV JOJ) as the sister station to this one. Any additional thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SEFF Binghamton: Student Experimental Film Festival in Binghamton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student film festival that doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:EVENTCRIT. The only coverage I can find comes from student newspapers or non-independent sources. Orphaned for over a decade, not a likely search term. hinnk (talk) 22:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and New York. hinnk (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa women's national under-18 softball team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent, third party coverage uncovered for this subject to meet the WP:NTEAM or WP:GNG. The only sources in the article now are primary. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Softball, and South Africa. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wiyh prejudice. Usual OR/unreliable sourced crud from Laura Hale. SerialNumber54129 23:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already at AFD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore women's junior national softball team) so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rouzbeh Rafie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPOSER. None of the sources here establish WP:GNG notability, either on account of not being independent (personal website, profile at Ulysses platform, which appears to allow self published pages, Ermes 404 a publisher of his music, an interview with Rafie), reliable (wordpress blog) or significant (pretty much all the other sources).

Criterion 3 of COMPOSER states that those who have written a composition that has won (or in some cases been given a second or other place) in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers. may be notable, but none of the competitions he has won appear to be "major" (at the very least, they don't have Wikipedia articles) Mach61 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Iran, and Italy. Mach61 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few more reliable independent sources (e.g. Association of Iranian Contemporary Music Composers (ACIMC)).

In my opinion, Rafie meets criteria for Wikipedia:NMUSICOTHER, saying "Composers and performers outside mass media traditions may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria: Has composed a number of notable melodies, tunes, or standards used in a notable music genre."

The competitions are notable from my point of view, especially considering the small world of contemporary experimental (classical) music. E.G. a festival like MUSEQUAL https://www.kokonainenfestival.fi/?lang=en has a very good reputation, even without a wiki article Klaviermusikfan1972 (talk) 08:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klaviermusikfan1972 None of the sources you added move the needle with regard to being independent and in-depth. (for example this is a profile on the website of an organization Rafie is a member of).

Rafie does not meet that criterion of NMUSICOTHER, because a "notable" composition is one that qualifies for an article, by having sources cover it. None of Rafie's originals have gotten that. Mach61 17:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need more participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Police Officers (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM, no WP:SIGCOV anywhere, no critical reception whatsoever. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Redirect to List of Kannada films of 2022~~: see article talk page -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. 2 strong sources, the second of which is very long [5]. The film had an alternative title of Police Officer. @Mushy Yank: @Vanderwaalforces: What do you think of the second source, which mentions box office? Did you do a WP:BEFORE? DareshMohan (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had looked vaguely at the time of the discussion but I’ll change my !vote. Thanks. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Given the review presented and coverage about production, there’s enough all in all to keep an article, I think. Very opposed to deletion anyway.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Réjane Magloire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NMUSICIAN. Couldn't find any significant coverage or chart listings. C F A 💬 23:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and New York. C F A 💬 23:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure about this one. The current stub focuses on her acting as a supporting role in a film that lacks its own article (although it could be notable - Denzel Washington played opposite her. Can we hear from the relevant projects? Can someone please tag or list them? Bearian (talk) 01:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC) I vaguely recall this film, Wilma, because it was so terrible, like cult-status bad. Bearian (talk) 01:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. She had three charting singles and an album in multiple countries. I found a lot online. I’m not sure how deep the nom searched, or if they asked any Gen X person, or if they looked into stage and band names. Her acting career was marginally notable, but her musical career was big stuff. Even Mariah Carey covered one of her songs. Bearian (talk) 02:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CGCG 396-2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article should be kept. It was notable enough for HST to observe it, being voted by Galaxy Zoo users. "Following a public vote, a selection of the most astronomically intriguing objects from the Galaxy Zoo were selected for follow-up observations with Hubble. CGCG 396-2 is one such object, and was captured in this image by Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys." ^[1] Phantomdj (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ HST page for this object

Keep per Phantomdj ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm afraid the Hubble site is the only source that has some non trivial commentary on the object. Don't think it is enough. --C messier (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Gems of the Galaxy Zoos, where it has a sentence. There is a very brief mention in the Gems of the Galaxy Zoos paper,[6] and articles associated with a news release about the photo. But I think there's not enough to establish notability by itself. Awesome image though. Praemonitus (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Main Event (Chamillionaire song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are to non third-party sources or places where the song is available for streaming. Never charted, cannot find sources, fails WP:NMUSIC Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chamillionaire#2008–2010: Final Mixtape Messiah, Venom, and Major Pain per nomination. Found no additional coverage/notability myself. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TayJay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable tag team. Just 16 sources: 8 of them, WP:RESULTS, the others didn't mention the team, just individual accomplishments. There are not enough reliable sources focusing on the team to prove notability. It's just an alliance between wrestlers. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Hapoel Tel Aviv F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article without any type of notoriety or references Alon9393 (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No content, nothing worth keeping. Geschichte (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am going to have a go a fixing up, they are a big club. If people decide to delete, then please move to my sandbox. Govvy (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think it’s now pretty well established at AfD that we don’t keep articles on members of pretend monarchies that haven’t existed for centuries. Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Georgia (country). Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Buerge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable for only being the main bachelor of The Bachelor (American TV series) season 2, the target that the nominated page should be redirected to. (The Bachelor (American TV series) is an alternative, but I prefer just season-specific.) His activities outside the series don't measure up to make WP:BIO1E (if not WP:BLP1E) inapplicable. Furthermore, the second season of The Bachelor may not have been a major event as it is perceived or marketed to be, despite good or decent viewership. If the cited rules don't apply, how about WP:PAGEDECIDE instead? George Ho (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television, and Missouri. George Ho (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Maccabi Petah Tikva F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the intro he talks about a football team then it becomes empty and irrelevant Alon9393 (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article can easily be fixed up if wanted, there are sources for transfers and matches for the club. Israel does have good news coverage for Premier League seasons there. So you can easily build an article if you want, GNG wouldn't be an issue. I have nothing against this being delete either. It's down to what people want to do with the article. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. At best, this should be draftified. It can be fixed, but not much is lost if it's deleted. Geschichte (talk) 23:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast Bulls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NSPORTS / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to American_Football_Ireland#Defunct_teams. As an WP:ATD-R. And per outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UCD American Football. Or, failing that, simply delete. (The only three sources I can find, which cover this short-lived amateur sports club, have been added to the article. Being this, this, and this. All examples of less-than-independent coverage and mostly trivial-passing-mentions. Nothing which establishes independent notability. The only reason for advocating a redirect, as an ATD, is because of this AfD outcome. Whatever the case, a standalone title cannot be justified on the basis of the sources. Which do not establish independent notability.) Guliolopez (talk) 23:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Northern Ireland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CAF Cepia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per discussion on the talk page (Talk:CAF Cepia), editors have asserted that the existence of a CAF Cepia or CAF Sepia model is not verifiable as of when this article was created in April of 2020. Searching online, I was only able to find a single Russian publication referring to a model by this name ([7]), and it dates to 2 years later in addition to otherwise being of unclear reliability and leaving some uncertainty as to the "correct" spelling given the high likelihood of confusion when transliterating s, c, r and p between Cyrillic, Latin and Turkish. Available evidence would appear to suggest that, irrespective of whether Turkish State Railways has bought trains manufactured by CAF, none of them are known as Sepia or Cepia and thus there should be neither a redirect nor an article at this title. A WP:BLAR was essentially challenged at an RfD discussion, with that discussion recommending it be sent to AfD. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Spain, and Turkey. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. None of the sources indicate CAF ever marketing the trains under that name. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 14:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Royal Yacht Squadron members

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NLIST. Might be WP:A3 eligible. Conyo14 (talk) 18:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It looks like before it was removed, the list was mostly sourced from this unsourced (random?) list of supposed members of the squadron. cyberdog958^Talk 20:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dorell Anthony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, article about a non-notable actor and filmmaker. Don't it satisfies criteria for WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG, possible WP:COI. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and United States of America. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't find much of anything for coverage, one article confirming the person joined Days of our Lives [8], but that's not enough for build an article or to prove notability. What's used now in the article isn't helpful, imdb and a local newspaper. Oaktree b (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, New York, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:CREATIVE with at least one very notable production to which his contribution was essential. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is the one good article but in a local paper. He did apparently write and produce a series (Pride: The Series), but that article has even fewer references so I suspect it won't be deemed notable. Even checking the fan sites and IMDB there isn't much (if any) engagement. Other than that he has had what seem to be minor roles in various soap operas and not terribly visible TV series. Lamona (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need more sources. Xegma(talk) 19:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Linxea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlikely to be notable: its a brokerage, that is only relevant in France, and doesn't make any claims for notability. Sadads (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet NCORP — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep French sources are notable and reliable enough to meet NCORP. The page could be shortened, though. --美しい歌 (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resoomer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has heavy coverage in industry press release type venues, but doesn't make a case for lasting notability, looks like SEO or COI editing. Sadads (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Public image of Mother Teresa

Previous AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Criticism of Mother Teresa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Started as a WP:POVFORK [9] and since then it has changed quite a bit but it never really improved. This article is not about her public image, which is overwhelmingly positive, (and not a notable topic which does not pass WP:GNG), it is about certain criticisms of her. For some reason the article got moved [10]. Criticism should be in the main article and this POVFORK should be removed. Polygnotus (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Christianity, India, and Albania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm COI on this because 1.) a family friend ran some of Mother Teresa's US PR stuff and 2.) Mother Teresa holds special, positive importance in a private element of my life. However, I'm of the opinion that this article, while possibly a bit OR-heavy, strikes me as generally neutral and notable. I can elaborate, but I feel my COI precludes me from seriously inserting myself any further here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti: COI users are allowed to have an opinion (even those who disagree with me

). See WP:COIEDIT and WP:COIADVICE. Do you know any reliable sources that are about her public image and not her as a person? Do you think it is a good idea that all criticism was removed from the article about her and moved to this, far more obscure, article? And that, possibly as a result of the move from Criticism of... to Public image of..., the criticism got hidden even further down the page? Polygnotus (talk) 02:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your encouragement to discussion! Perusing JSTOR, I'm finding some pieces like this. Generally, they come from the late 1990s and are heaving on the sociology (not necessarily bad, especially in a subjective subject). I have objections over centering criticisms like Hitchens's on her biographical article—one of a few significant marks against his legacy—but generally agree that we need to exercise caution in any diminishment of sustained and impactful criticism. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is interesting to see how some people are overly cautious with anything approaching COI while others... are not. ;-) Of course, the criticism comes not just from Hitchens. People like Aroup Chatterjee and Tariq Ali and Mihir Bose and even people who worked for her like Hemley Gonzalez and Susan Shields et cetera have famously criticized her work. There are a lot of very important people who said very positive things about her; let's be fair and balance that out with some of the criticism. MLK jr got a criticism section. You can probably write a criticism section for Ghandi. I am quoting myself, and when I wrote that the Mother Teresa article still had a criticism section. No matter what happens here, the criticism will return anyway. It never left, despite attempts to hide it. Polygnotus (talk) 02:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti: sorry I forgot to ping. Polygnotus (talk) 02:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critics say grossly inadequate medical care was given to the sick and dying. Syringes were reused without sterilisation, pain relief was non-existent or negligible, and conditions were unhygienic. Meanwhile, Mother Teresa spent much of her time travelling around the world in a private plane to meet political leaders. -- The Guardian. Polygnotus (talk) 03:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at WP:SIZESPLIT, over 9000 words means "Probably should be divided or trimmed". The main article currently got only 5000 words. I flipped it around. If it would be fair then that shouldn't matter, right? But it does cause it isn't.

Finally, how competent are the sisters at managing pain? On a short visit, I could not judge the power of the spiritual approach, but I was disturbed to learn the formulary includes no strong analgesics. Along with the neglect of diagnosis, the lack of good analgesia marks Mother Teresa's approach as clearly separate from the hospice movement. I know which I prefer.' Robin Fox, editor of The Lancet from 1990 to 1995. PMID: 7818649 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92353-1 Polygnotus (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Polygnotus: I still feel too COI to formally !vote, but you've convinced me. I now favor deletion. Thanks for your comments. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article was previously nominated for deletion on August 2023. The article's current title came as a result of that discussion. I was the one who removed the criticism section but I retained the criticism against her since it would be a violation of NPOV to remove it. You do not need such a section to include criticism about a person. The NPOV policy discourages such sections anyway. StephenMacky1 (talk) 12:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, or merge - clear WP:POVFORK, and the lack of criticism in the main article is now notable by its absence. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nutan (Nepalese actor)

Previous AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Nutan (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in January as Nutan (actor). Still doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Nepal. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who accepted this article, initially I thought he might meet the general notability guideline, but now looking back, yeah, he doesn't. Delete. OhHaiMark (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Search about him on Google, YouTube and other websites. I think he meets the general notability guideline. Most of his articles are in Nepalese language, so you might be thinking that way. Thanks! 111.119.49.66 (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion, so relisting to come to clearer consensus to delete the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus Boesch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NARTIST. No indication of significance. Promo puff piece article. scope_creep^Talk 18:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Austria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear WcQuiddith! Could you help me? What is wrong with the topics 'Artist' and 'Austria'? Klaus Boesch is an Austrian citizen and he is an artist, being successful in the asian and ME region mainly. Which does not make his artworks any worse than works of artists who are renowned in the US. The English Wikipedia should carry international measurements, because English is the language many Wiki users look up if they can't find anyting in their own language. Rich KB (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing for this artist, no listing in the Getty ULAN [11], there is a motorboat company and an athlete with the same name. Oaktree b (talk) 23:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here [12] or [13], neither of which seem to be about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 00:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Oaktree, I have read the in the Getty ULAN website, it is a historical database. But Klaus Boesch is a still alive artist. You might find his profile on Artmajeur.com in example. I find it interesting, that Wikipedia seems not to allow establishing novelties. Sandman is not in the Getty database, because Klaus Boesch has not achieved major success in USA. Also let me add, that the English Wikipedia should be open for a world-wide community and not be snippeted to American measurements only! Klaus Boesch's success happens in Japan and China. If it is important for you to be listed in the Getty ULAN - could you let me know how an artist can be listed there?

The motorboat company from Switzerland and the athlete have nothing to do with Klaus Boesch. Rich KB (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything either. scope_creep^Talk 13:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pontic uprising

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

source articles are very clearly biased and take a strongly ethnonationalist point of view, denigrating pontic greeks and armenians while glorifying the turks. I am additionally not certain of the notability of this event. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine Spandagos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. scope_creep^Talk 18:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Engineering, Environment, Greece, England, and New Hampshire. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete early-career academic with citation counts not yet at the level needed for WP:PROF#C1. The article cites some mainstream media coverage of research he participated in (in the South China Morning Post and Irish Times) but his part in that work was apparently minor enough that he is not even name-dropped in those articles or in anything at all in Google News. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not remotely attained. Why on earth was this premature BLP created? Xxanthippe (talk) 00:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Dara Greaney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Cited sources routinely mention him as CEO, but none of them go in detail and mostly are about the company, BuyAutoParts.com. Gheus (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Rossilli Jr.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The claim of notability as a media entrepreneur is weak and lacks the in-depth reliable and verifiable sources required to back up the claim. Recording songs for release on iTunes is an even weaker claim of notability, not does his work as a teacher reach any notability standard. I was unable to find any meaningful in-depth coverage for him in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Film, and New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Journalism, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not found, Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Zahrisaurus

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another Malkani dinosaur. References are exclusively predatory journals. This is not a real dinosaur, or even a notable fake one. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice it was previously "soft" deleted, ~~potentially making this eligible for WP:CSD#G4~~? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organisms, and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though perhaps in future creating a page similar to List of informally named dinosaurs would be useful as a place to consolidate this information without making standalone articles (see other Malkani taxa such as Balochisaurus are entries on the page). IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This article is pointless. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 19:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Validity not supported by reliable journal articles. There is no point in recognizing a taxonomic name originating from a predatory journal anywhere on Wikipedia. PrimalMustelid (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of urban areas in Scotland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced (sources are mentioned but not cited anywhere) and is essentially an unnecessary spin-off of List of towns and cities in Scotland by population, using same methodology as the Settlements list (the figures differ slightly due to taking the figures from different years). De-prodded by editor who possibly didn't realise that the above article contains sections for both Localities and multi-locality Settlements, i.e urban areas. Crowsus (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Scotland. Crowsus (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK probably merge with List of towns and cities in Scotland by population#Settlements, I indeed hadn't noticed that section. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

River Lyvennet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of sources. Xegma(talk) 17:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a source about the walk though its from the national park so may not be secondary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see an encyclopedic development other than an informative pamphlet. Alon9393 (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adebayo Adeleke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Refs are primary on a WP:BLP made up of interviews, profiles, podcasts. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 17:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Military, Nigeria, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Seems like a person who does good work, but I'm not seeing notability from the lack of sources. [14] or [15], primary sourcing or an interview, which don't contribute to notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I ain’t making a !vote yet but this source says he’s a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. If this is truly true, doesn’t this meet the NPROF#3? Best, Reading Beans 07:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Its doesn't add nothing. Its not an elected postion, you just send in your money and your a member. Now, if it was something like a Fellow of the Royal Society, that would be completely different. scope_creep^Talk 11:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Theory of Interstellar Trade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable speculative article; the sole sources about are the author and a single commentary in a blog. The author himself confesses that it was a tongue-in-cheek endeavor. --Altenmann >talk 17:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I dunno, it's been cited 65 times, which seems high for a tongue-in-cheek joke article! It's been discussed quite a lot in books as well, in addition to Tyler Cowen's commentary that's already in the article. I think it's arguable that this article could be treated as notable under WP:BKCRIT #5, with an author "so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study." I could be convinced to redirect, since it's likely a valid search term, but I'm on keep for now. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and Spaceflight. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I've found some decent coverage. In rough order of significance:

An article in the Economist (archived)
A section of a CBC business article
A paragraph in a NYT opinion piece (archived)
A paragraph in Coined: The Rich Life of Money and How Its History Has Shaped Us at Google Books
A paragraph in Fake Physics: Spoofs, Hoaxes and Fictitious Science, p. 76, at Google Books
A paragraph in Academia Obscura: The Hidden Silly Side of Higher Education at Google Books
A paragraph in The Cosmos Economy: The Industrialization of Space, p. 193, at Google Books
A parenthetical aside in Cosmology for the Curious, p. 58, at Google Books
A footnote in What Led Eminent Economists to Become Economists?
A mention in Earth Economics: An Introduction, p. 4, at Google Books
A mention in The Space Value of Money: Rethinking Finance Beyond Risk & Time at Google Books
A mention in Asteroids: How Love, Fear, and Greed Will Determine Our Future in Space at Google Books
An excerpt in Issues in General Economic Research and Application: 2011 Edition, p. 592, at Google Books

jlwoodwa (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn; speedy keep‎. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Address to the Nation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is WP:SYNTH and thus fails WP:GNG by violating WP:NOR. The article cites no source describing the concept of an "address to the nation" or "national address" as a global phenomenon; instead, it describes specific examples in particular countries (relying primarily on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES) and strings them together in what is definitionally original research. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Politics. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – I agree that we don't need an article about the topic of national addresses, but I think it could be converted to a reasonable list of national addresses. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a reasonable outcome. I'll withdraw and move the article. Keep. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Amla Sadarpur Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well-established but ultimately non-notable school. None of the sources cited contribute anything towards notability, and a BEFORE search finds nothing more than the usual social media accounts, directory listings, etc. (If someone can find non-English sources that satisfy the WP:GNG standard, please do.) Declined at AfC but published by the author regardless, so here we are. Clearly fails WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt to Add Citations - Hmm, I will try to see if there is anything that can be done. I will try to look for citations that makes proof that the school is notable. Many more might participate, if this page is seen by more, If there are not any citations or proof of notability, there is possibly a reason for deletion. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If any citations that give clear proof that school has notability, English or Non-English. Keep might be a option. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

British army in the Eureka Rebellion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary content fork. Content could easily be merged into Eureka Rebellion and List of Eureka Stockade defenders. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 16:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
keep not at all a WP:CFORK. I see almost no overlaps. And we don't merge large articles into huger ones. --Altenmann >talk 17:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Just wanted to note that 860 words of readable prose is hardly a large article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Wayshak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article and a WP:BEFORE search turns up no WP:SIGCOV in independent, secondary, reliable sources for this comic artist -- just WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS and WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. Thus the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO; the subject also meets no criterion of WP:NARTIST. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Comics and animation. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsing vandalism from blocked user Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the deletion of Daniel Morcombe which did get undeleted. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

What has this got to do with Morcombe? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kellpb93ke What does Daniel Morcombe have to do with Jonathan Wayshak? Did you mean to comment on a different discussion? Unless this comment was posted mistakenly, there is no actual rationale offered to keep the article. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete Poorly referenced. --Altenmann >talk 17:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jonathan Wayshak is a primary subject in the MTV News, Juxtapoz, and Fangoria, and more cited in the article. He has illustrated posters for Beetlejuice, and comics for DC, Halo, etc. Hexatekin (talk) 04:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are we looking at the same sources?
- The MTV source is a WP:INTERVIEW and as a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE cannot contribute to notability.
- The Juxtapoz source has a single WP:TRIVIALMENTION of Wayshak's name.
- Fangoria has a single paragraph discussing a poster Wayshak illustrated, most of it consisting of a quote from Wayshak.
None of these are WP:SIGCOV to qualify toward notability. And it's a complete red herring to say "he has illustrated posters...and comics." That doesn't establish notability at all. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen Sheehan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a lobbyist, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for lobbyists. The attempted notability claim here is that he had political consultancy roles, like campaign manager or chief of staff, before registering as a lobbyist, but those are completely unsourced for the purposes of turning them into notability claims, while his work as a lobbyist is referenced entirely to a single directory entry that isn't support for notability. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage in media about him and his work. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I did find [16] but again it is not an in-depth source about Sheehan. LizardJr8 (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Newspaper coverage has about as much as the comment above found [17], brief mentions but nothing for notability. I don't see anything else we can use for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It's easy to find this person is/was a lobbyist as mentioned in the article. But as far as what he achieved in that capacity, just isn't available. — Maile (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Needs cleanup to stub level. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Please provide sources to support notability Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kablammo (talk) 16:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Art of Sound (exhibition)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Music. Netherzone (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James P. Covey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a diplomat and politician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for diplomats or politicians. The attempted notability claim here is that he was nominated for a subcabinet position but was never confirmed into the role by the senate, which is not "inherently" notable in and of itself -- the notability bar at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just being nominated for one -- but the article says absolutely nothing else about his career up to that point to suggest any other basis for preexisting notability, and it's referenced 2/3 to primary sources that are not support for notability at all. And while there is one reliable source to a piece of media coverage, one of those isn't enough all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Rather brief political career [18], then back into obscurity. I don't see enough sourcing to use for an article. Even the position held was a low-level one, for a brief period of time. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable. His diplomatic nomination never saw fruition, and no other information about him is available. — Maile (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and convert to stub. If we can do it for Daniel Morcombe we can do it for this. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note This editor has since been blocked for vandalism. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree b. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Bernard Djambou

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Olympian with virtually no source coverage. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cycling and Cameroon. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need to add more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North Malabar Institute of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This exists, but even the very stubby article doesn't prove it. Its own website server fails to respond. Not inherently notable. Fails WP:NCORP 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Kerala. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Back in 2015 the creating editor twice removed a {{merge to}} template, refusing to discuss it. I am not averse to a merge if deemed appropriate 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kannur University. LibStar (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 13:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and increase to a stub article. Win-win ending. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
What does "win win ending" mean here? LibStar (talk) 23:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Institute have no individual sources fails WP:NCORP. Xegma(talk) 17:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friends Communication

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient reliable news coverage independent of the topic here, per WP:CORP Loewstisch (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loewstisch (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify it for now. Xegma(talk) 14:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oladipupo Olayinka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any other sources talking about him. Only WP:PASSINGMENTION Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Nigeria. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Tennis. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the Review Exceptionalmagic (talk) 13:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete need more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sportsman's notability. --Altenmann >talk 17:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:SPORTCRIT, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lister Storm GTM002

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable vehicle chassi, information is out of scope of Wikipedia. However, having a hard time figuring out where would be an appropriate rederict/merge -- the race team? Sadads (talk) 12:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Transportation. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Baffling to find an article about such a specific, unspecial chassis - not even a model! Don't see any encyclopaedic value in it. No mainspace links to it exist ([19]). Think a suitable redirect target would be Lister Storm or Lister Storm#GT, but we've got to consider deleting it altogether. MSport1005 (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Brook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only RS coverage is run of the mill high school sports coverage in local news outlets. Being " most successful boys basketball coach in the history of Sebring McKinley High School" certainly does not establish notability. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Ohio. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Hall of fame might be notable with decent sourcing, but the lack of sources isn't helping. I don't find anything we can use, sources now in the article are primary/related to the sports teams. Oaktree b (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any of them are notability-lending. One is the high school he attended, the high school where he coached, and one specific to Ohio high school basketball coaches by the Ohio basketball coaches association. Both high schools appear to have had and still have rather low enrollments. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New FM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2010 Golikom (talk) 11:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 12:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 12:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Broadcast Operations Group per ATD. Nate • (chatter) 16:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gurukripa Career Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The institute is a coaching centre for the preparation of competitive exams, not an government approved educational establishment. It does not meet WP:NSCHOOL. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Also several new SPAs are engaged in suspicious editing this page. They have even tried to manipulate the List of institutions of higher education in Rajasthan by creating a new section for "Coaching institutes" and adding this coaching centre, which is not an appropriate category. Charlie (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, India, and Rajasthan. Charlie (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP which schools must pass nowadays. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I have spent some time removing promotional and repeated content. What's left doesn't meet NCORP (just routine reporting). Paul W (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:*Keep: Yes, there was some promotional content in this article, but I believe deletion is not the solution. I have visited this institute, and many others visit it as well. However, there is no proper source that provides accurate information about this institute. Therefore, I think we should add correct and reliable information instead of deleting it. This way, it will help people find the right information about the institute, which has a large number of students. Every year, many students try to get information about this institute, but they struggle to find reliable and proper sources.

~~Sandeep Kumar Kajla (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)~~Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the students can't find any sources, and you can't find sources, that indicates this isn't a notable institution. Oaktree b (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~:* Keep : I think we should keep this article as it will reflect the truth of coaching industry.~~

~~Mike20008 (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC))~~Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep: Deletion is not in order here. The article provides a good beginning for information on a major institute. With an update using credible and accurate data, we can do much better to serve the needs of interested individuals. Semsuineas.wiki (talk) 12:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Charlie, I think you've read the List of Institutions of Higher Education in Rajasthan properly. At the top, some private engineering colleges are mentioned, and their pages have also been published. Therefore, I don't believe we can't add private institutes.

~~Mike20008 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)~~Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep: Removing the article is not a solution. The institute is very important to a lot of students. By re-writing with known and verified information, we could offer a valuable page to those looking for correct information.

~~Maggidi (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)~~Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:@CharlieMehta, I do not want to get caught in this controversy but would like to say one thing that instead of deleting, everyone should try to improve, because even today there are many articles which are not correct and the recent information is also not updated, so more focus should be kept on improving. Let's all decide together whether to keep it or not @Maggidi, @Mike20008, @Paul W, @Semsuineas.wiki, @Skajlajjn1996, @Timtrent

~~Thanks Devidafrica.villager (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)~~Account blocked for abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Five accounts with less than 100 edits (three of which have less than 10) all commenting within an hour of each other saying the same thing. At the risk of stating the obvious, it seems there is some sock/meatpupperty going on in this discussion with the goal of WP:Bludgeoning. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. RangersRus (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:per nom. R0paire-wiki (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thibault Duplessis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. No indication of signification found in the before. scope_creep^Talk 11:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Software, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edie Rodriguez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable business woman. Article has been an orphan for 7 years, sources are all trade press puff. Golikom (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Travel and tourism, New Jersey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says:
People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
Sources
1. Golden, Fran (2015-01-15). "Cruise Exec Spotlight: Edie Rodriguez". Porthole Cruise Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
  The article notes: "Edie Rodriguez (née Edie Bornstein), president and chief operating office of Los Angeles–based luxury line Crystal Cruises, is a 53-year-old Type-A personality who sleeps four hours a night, likes fast cars, and never met a Neiman Marcus she didn’t like. And she’s obsessed — with Rod Stewart. ... Travel got into her soul as a child growing up in New York, when she decided her quest was to see the world. But there was the slight issue that she had no money, she laughs. So she went to work as a travel consultant, relocated to…"
2. Sampson, Hannah (2013-10-05). "Edie Bornstein to lead Crystal Cruises". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
  The article notes: "Edie Bornstein, who left Azamara on Sept. 30, will become president and chief operating officer of Los Angeles-based Crystal Cruises effective Oct. 16. She replaces Gregg Michel, whose resignation was announced Friday. Bornstein joined Azamara, the upscale two-ship brand owned by Royal Caribbean Cruises, in 2009. Before that, she was vice president of business development and strategic partnerships at Carnival Cruise Lines and also had stints at Cunard and Seabourn. Before working for cruise lines, she focused on the cruise industry at Amadeus, the global travel technology company."
3. Herrera, Chabeli (2017-10-20). "You may not know of French line Ponant yet — but a Miami cruise expert plans to change that". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
  The article notes: "Rodriguez joined Crystal after holding several senior sales, marketing and business development positions at Royal Caribbean Cruises and Carnival Corporation. She served as Crystal's president and chief operating officer from 2013-14 before being promoted to president and CEO in 2015, when the cruise line was acquired by Genting Hong Kong."
4. Herrera, Chabeli (2017-09-15). "Crystal Cruises' president and CEO Edie Rodriguez resigns". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2021-02-12. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
  The article notes: "Since Rodriguez took the helm as president and CEO, Crystal has launched two river vessels, with a third forthcoming, an expedition yacht, and an ultra luxury, private Boeing 777. The three brands, Crystal Yachts, Crystal River Cruises and Crystal Air, have been instrumental in growing Crystal’s footprint in the luxury travel market."
5. Becken, Bill (Spring–Summer 2014). "The new face of Crystal Cruises". International Cruise & Ferry Review. No. 44. pp. 82–83. ISSN 0957-7696. EBSCOhost 113549718.
  The article notes: "Whether regaling travel agents at an elegant seaside resort in southeast Florida, or holding court for a retinue of luxury travel media aboard the Crystal Serenity on the West Coast in Los Angeles, Edie Bornstein, Crystal Cruises' new president and chief operating officer, is understandably busy. Appointed in October 2013, she previously served as SVP, sales and marketing for Azamara Club Cruises, based in Miami. There is a logical progression from Azamara's upmarket offering with its two, roughly 700-passenger ships, to Crystal's ultra-luxury brand, deploying two ships of around 1,000-passenger capacity. Consequently, even as a presidential newcomer at Crystal, Bornstein exudes the same confident manner and zeal as she was known for in her earlier career."
6. Snyder, Benjamin (2016-01-21). "Meet the Only Woman to Lead a Luxury Cruise Line". Fortune. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
  The article notes: "For Crystal Cruises CEO Edie Rodriguez, travel isn’t just a hobby—it’s a way of life. In fact, Rodriguez has traveled to nearly 200 countries so far. Chances are, she’s nowhere near finished. Since starting with the luxury cruise line in 2013, the travel industry veteran has been all business. Indeed, she’s been working to transform the line’s culture—and even the way people vacation, as Fortune recently reported. Rodriguez is building out the brand to not only include excursions by sea, but also by river on a yacht and even by airplane. And, as the only female CEO of a luxury cruise line, she’s also blazing a new path in industry where the top ranks are dominated by men. Rodriguez began her career as a travel consultant and has worked for Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruises, and Azamara Club Cruises over the years."
7. Less significant coverage:
  1. Sampson, Hannah (2019-09-21). "Christine Duffy named new Carnival Cruise Line president". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on 2019-09-21. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
    The article notes: "Late last year, Crystal Cruises chose Edie Rodriguez (then Edie Bornstein) as president and chief operating officer"
  2. Vora, Shivani (2015-10-13). "Why Crystal Cruises Is Adding a Plane and Submarine to Its Fleet". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
    The article notes: "Crystal Cruises is on something of a tear. The Los Angeles-based luxury cruise line currently sails to all seven continents on itineraries ranging from five to 128 days, but the chief executive, Edie Rodriguez, 54, recently announced an aggressive expansion plan for its 25th anniversary this year. It started with her commissioning three new vessels to be built for Crystal's core fleet, bringing the total to five. ... Ms. Rodriguez has visited more than 75 countries through cruising."
  3. Kickham, Debbi K. (2014-09-20). "Cruising her way to the top: Edie Rodriguez". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 2024-09-10. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
    The article notes: "Edie Rodriguez is a type-A born-and-bred New Yorker and last year was made president and chief operating officer at Crystal Cruises. We checked in with her to see if her business life is all smooth sailing."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Edie Rodriguez to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Uttar Pradesh train derailment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, title is ambiguous as there are other (albeit non notable) derailment incidents in the state, including a recent one just hours ago. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Transportation, and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify it for now, need to add more sources. Xegma(talk) 16:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:BRANCH. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 10:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Article is about a degree-granting unit of the national university of the Philippines. Though I do admit that I haven't been able to flesh out the article yet, it seems hardly accurate to say that it has no indication of significance considering that it's about a part of the larger University of the Philippines Diliman but otherwise wouldn't fit on that page. Brly31415 (talk) 10:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Schools, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is a several of these department articles that are essentially cut and paste article with the information lifted from the university websites resulting in a WP:PRIMARY sources that fails WP:SIRS. The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of the Philippines College of Music was deleted and recreated and G4'd. They are nothing except UPE articles. scope_creep^Talk 09:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article has now been updated to include information unique solely to the article. I've addressed issues on both content and notability. It's no longer "essentially cut and paste." Brly31415 (talk) 17:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matej Rehák

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rehák played a total of 19 minutes at professional level before being sent to lower leagues, then disappeared. The only secondary source I found is SME but it's paywalled. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lack of achievements and corresponding lack of sources. Geschichte (talk) 22:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technology Connections

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still believe this fails SIGCOV and notability for the same reasons discussed in the last AfD discussion two months ago. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep enough independent sources with significant coverage to meet the bar for WP:GNG. If that would not be the case, Alec Watson meets WP:NAUTHOR anyway. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources do you consider to meet the bar for each of those paths? Sdkb ^talk 14:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per the comment of DigitalIceAge. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is getting tedious. We have significant coverage about the channel itself in multiple reliable sources: The Physics Teacher source is expressely about his channel, the Lifehacker source dedicates over 100 words about his channel, Jancovic 2023 is a published book that spends an entire page praising Watson's deducition skills. Almost all of the rest of the sources contain enough editoralizing about his channel to constitute sigcov of Technology Connections. Per WP:WEBCRIT it passes the bar. DigitalIceAge (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Monument Mythos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail notability guidelines. Most of the article’s sources are student newspapers by the author’s own description. Could not find reliable significant coverage in my search. Has been previously deleted. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has been previously deleted.... when? Has been previously kept....Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Draft:The_Monument_Mythos... -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was kept as a draft. It was nominated for deletion as a draft by a non-good-faith actor. But that is not evidence that there was a consensus that the subject is notable after someone challenged its notability. Drafts are not deleted for lack of notability so a draft being kept does not mean that editors thought that the subject is notable. —Alalch E. 15:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Nomad Vagabond)} 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is about all there is [20] for sourcing and it's not enough. Rest of what's used is marginally reliable sources per Source Highlighter, so not much of anything we can use for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I am satisfied with the existing coverage, see GNews please. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: significant coverage in reliable sources includes Collider (twice) but also The Gamer among other things and I would consider https://fnewsmagazine.com/2022/01/ghosts-in-the-machine-the-star-spangled-monsters-of-mister-manticores-the-monument-mythos/ and the article in the The Signal perfectly acceptable sources too.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kashif Aslam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable makeup artist. This was created after the deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashee's Beauty Salon by the same user. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and none of the awards he received are significant. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Delete as per nom. Fails WP:GNG Wikibear47 (talk) 13:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CalDigit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for companies. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Checking in Google News, there are hundreds (20 pages of links) of independent appearances in media. Still, it's true they are mostly reviews of their products, not talking about the company itself. The company consumer products have been pretty popular, but maybe that fame is not enough. Tbh I'm not sure. Janeender (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raihan Merchant

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tamgha-e-Imtiaz is a minor (4th grade) award, according to our article. There is no direct or in-depth coverage about him. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'4th grade' makes it sounds like it isn't a real award at all, whereas it definitely is and only conferred upon high-achievers. It is the 'medal of excellence' after all. Raihan Merchant is actually a super influential figure in Pakistan media and advertising. Sharan Shias (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ACM Gold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex broker. Coverage is mostly paid/PR-based. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 09:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irfan Pardesi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex trader. Lacks unpaid independent in-depth secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Undisclosed paid editing. Fails GNG. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I think this is about him [21] but it's not extensive coverage regardless. I don't see notability with the sources now used, which appear in PR items, industry trade magazines, or about this person talking to media. Oaktree b (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Kule

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

8 games in Albania’s highest league, continued in the semi-pro second tier, did get 4 more games on the top level. With sources not being better than this, this or this, I don't think it meets WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. What do you think? Geschichte (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhi (2023 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently 123telugu was declared unreliable by the Indian cinema taskforce. Given that Indiaglitz is also considered unreliable, there are no reliable reviews (had there been at least 1, I would have let this slide). There was a FilmyFocus review on the page but that is also likely non notable (all unreliable sources can't be listed there). Given that the fact that the longest source is an interview from 123telugu, this film has no notability.

The TV9 Telugu source is a small snippet only mentioned that Vishwak Sen was invited for the film's launch while the NTV source mentions where the film is streaming. All in all, the only notable reliable source is the NTV source [22], which isn't enough to keep an entire Wikipedia article of a 2023 film. This isn't even a pre Internet film.

P. S. I had tried my best to improve the film's sourcing to no avail. DareshMohan (talk) 07:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have no comment on this. Either delete, or redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023. My main aim to create this article was to add more entries to Vidhi, but this also does the job. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023 (not opposed to Keep myself, see article talk page) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List_of_Telugu_films_of_2023#October–December. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 20:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sadush Danaj

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are profile and no significant coverages. Xegma(talk) 07:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I honestly have no idea what the coverage is like in Albania and for the clubs he played for, there are two in the list that are a fair size and get good support. If someone does build a decent article with sources ping me please. Govvy (talk) 21:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PGC 2387685

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the interacting companion galaxy, SDSS J161330.18+510335.5, has at least one paper published.[23] Praemonitus (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helge Rasche

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FOOTYN as he never played nor coached at top level. Coverage is only of his death, which does not automatically establish notability. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and Germany. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly does not pass WP:FOOTYN as a player, while his coaching achievement (not managership) consists solely of an Under-19 role and nothing in a senior capacity. I detect some kind of personal sympathy voting as an inspiration for the creation and expansion of this article. Ref ^(chew)(do) 07:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. NB that FOOTYN is meaningless. Giant Snowman 18:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant can have your say on the relevance of Abdul Hannan (singer).Alon9393 (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASS. Giant Snowman 18:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant The issue is that no one has an opinion on whether it should be maintained or eliminated, it is abandoned.Alon9393 (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant - essays such as WP:FOOTYN are not binding; however, they are intrinsically relevant or else they would not exist as essays due to their irrelevance. WP:FOOTYN is merely a yardstick by which to measure the nominated's article for signs of notability, not a directive or guideline, and as such is not as meaningless as you might feel. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are totally wrong. FOOTYN is a Project-specific essay which confirms that it is nothing more than a "record of the previous guidance". Giant Snowman 17:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All-know tragic, and having a look at sources on the article and online, I really only see what you call a WP:routine type of coverage on the announcement of his death. What's impressive know is that it is covered fairly globally, I saw sources from, America, Africa, Europe. But it's all the same thing, which is the announcement, I don't see how this is WP:LASTING. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very unclear whether this group of "lower communities" which includes e.g. Sat-Sudra (considered higher castes), is a commonly accepted grouping with a clear definition, or some division created specifically for this article. Also not clear if the topic (Sanskrit texts by caste division) is a topic of study and whether these people are grouped together scholarly, or if this is some novel WP:SYNTH list. Fram (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Language, Hinduism, and India. Fram (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article of Sat-Sudra is very badly written. I have suggested an edit but my edit is reverted. Please check. Sat-shoodras are only higher than other shudras (asat shudras) and lower than every other varna. That is, Lower than Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishya. See the note on sat-shoodra there. Caste boundaries can't be clearly defined due to their complexities. The main castes are mentioned themselves which are considered lower nonetheless. Sat-shoodra only highlights their status in varna system. This is a dynamic list and more people from other communities can be added by everyone. The topic of debate has always been whether lower communities have contributed to sanskrit among scholars. This article helps in breaking the myths of denial of education and lack of scholarship among lower communities and foster inclusivity. Mohit Dokania (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NLIST and WP:RS. Almost 60 % of the sources are unreliable. Andhraportal, wisdomlib, jainqq.org, sanskritkosha,sndp, sanskritdocuments etc., are not RS. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent, reliable sources, which I find none here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All references to Wisdomlib, Jainqq.org and sanskritkosha are of published books available on those sources. Which are both reliable and accurate. All the information provided are as accurate as possible. You can challenge any misinformation in talk page. This has always been the matter of debate among scholars to assess the contribution of lower communuties in Sanskrit literature. See this. Mohit Dokania (talk) 15:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "Lower communities" is ambiguous. Are Vaishyas and Reddys lower communities? The list is a product of WP:SYTH and fails WP:NLIST.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Tanha Dar Mazrae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources (a.k.a. no wiki links) and no reliable reviews. This may fail Wikipedia:Notability (films). This article about a short film is short because no other sources exist.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayeye Penhan. I am also nominating the following related page because it is also is sourced by a similar website (akhbarrasmi, is it notable?):

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, no participation so far.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinch to Punch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This lacks WP:SIGCOV even the article knows it limited information has surfaced online. Oricon yield no result, Natalie yield no result, even the Japanese article has one source, the only thing I could find that is RS is from the Media Arts Database Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating this related articles with the same reason as above

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Keep) and improve with sources from the Japanese WP, that has a lot considering it's a 1969-1970 series! -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Education, and Transportation. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(My initial !vote above is about Zen-chan Tsū-chan). I hadn't seen this was a bundled nom when I !voted through the assisted script. Procedural keep. These series have very little in common. And it's hard to discuss and improve the 3 at the same time without long tedious explanations and comments about what precisely is relevant to each case. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC) (The nominator indicates they nominated the pages "with the same reason" but the 2nd article has >10 references to reliable newspapers on JaWP, for example.)[reply]
I'll just seperate the 2nd one. Thanks for pointing out Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my mention of ’the 2nd article’ is unclear: for the record, I mean Zen-chan Tsū-chan. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects to the respective networks should also be considered.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to see some way to keep the content, and suggest a merge to Fuji Television. For the ones which are made by Fuji, which doesn't include Zen-chan (please, please, don't do combined nominations of disparate articles!). Not sure about Zen-chan, as like @Mushy Yank this came up as a single article for me and I hadn't given it any thought before starting this comment
On Pinch to Punch it's unfortunate that there is so little secondary material out there although it seems even the primary material has been lost. This attests to its importance in the context of the development of Anime. This article could be perfectly happy as a stub, verified by what little information is out there, but it's hard to make a case for IAR on this. Oblivy (talk) 07:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with developing these articles would be our inability to access archives which would have information about an anime series from 50 years ago. Hard to imagine that Pinch and Punch, a series with 156 episodes airing on a national TV channel, wouldn't be notable with access to the correct archives. If someone is interested, perhaps Fuji or the National Film Archive of Japan can help? I would personally either keep or merge the articles at a minimum. DCsansei (talk) 07:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is no consensus here. But I don't see any support for Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes lack of WP:SIGCOV.

Note - maximum sources are databases. and it's an enough reason to delete. Xegma(talk) 13:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. That is not true. References to Japanese newspapers of the time on the JA WP page. See my comments above, thanks. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 01:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's multi-paragraph coverage in this book at 634, less extensive at 132, 146, and 268. Oblivy (talk) 02:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perak railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTRAINSTATION. cyberdog958^Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and Pakistan. cyberdog958^Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rohri–Chaman Line or List of railway stations in Pakistan. Easy to resume the work this way - if someone curious like me finds offline coverage in future. Gheus (talk) 10:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources 🌀Typ hoon Ampil ^Tools 10:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nom Kingsmasher678 (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rohri–Chaman Line#Stations. This is a plausible search term and there's no reason not to redirect. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rohri–Chaman Line#Stations as plausible search term. Djflem (talk) 17:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect if not expanded, per Pi.141... Thryduulf (talk) 09:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North American Grappling Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and NCORP for not having signification coverage from independent, reliable sources for verification. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and North America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV and no independent sources. Xegma(talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Corporation Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Single ref is effectively WP:OR. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Significant organization, state-owned power distributor having vast network and consumer base, has more than one reliable citations now. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We will go through your new references to check them. scope_creep^Talk 19:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎ under WP:G5 by CactusWriter. (non-admin closure) ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tafsir-e-Zakaria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverages and unsourced sections. Xegma(talk) 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Islam. Shellwood (talk) 08:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Company Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Significant organization, state-owned power distributor having vast network and consumer base. Google search reflects a lot of sources showing the kind of significance the org. holds. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Single ref is effectively WP:OR. scope_creep^Talk 06:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Significant organization, state-owned power distributor having vast network and consumer base, has more than one reliable citations now. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barren Earth (DC Comics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any reliable source talking about it so it clearly fails WP:GNG. The article only cites 1 sources which they repeated twice Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need to add published sources. Xegma(talk) 13:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Gotham TV Award for Outstanding Performance in a Drama Series

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's hard to decide if I will draftify this article but this feels like it's too soon to have the a standalone article. The award and the 1st edition of the award itself is notable but this specific category as of now, seems no notable. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating this article for the same reason:

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Awards, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as a WP:SPLITLIST or redirect to the main page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gotham Awards#Gotham TV Awards for now; assuming that the next ceremony includes these categories, these lists would no longer copy information from a single article and could be recreated then. I would also support redirecting Gotham TV Award for Outstanding Performance in a Comedy Series for the same reasons. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 05:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep has source but need more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Evening News (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never charted and fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Roasted (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Roasted (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Full of unsourced, original research and does not demonstrate notability. cyberdog958^Talk 07:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom 🌀Typ hoon Ampil ^Tools 10:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Search only brings up Spotify, other streaming/video sites and lyrics. I don't see sources we can use for notability. Being sourced to mp3.com is a bit of a throwback, but doesn't help notability either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ultimate Victory per above + I also found no additional sources/notability. Redirecting a song article to the album it's from is standard, and there aren't any other songs with this name listed at Evening News (disambiguation) so ambiguity is a non-issue. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James L. Enos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No clear indication of notability. Being the first president of the National Teachers Association isn't enough. No significant coverage in cited sources. Before search found nothing significant. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Iowa. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Journalism, Iowa, New York, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Peace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. The book seems to notable but not the individual. Note tag placed on it. Coverage is all for the book. scope_creep^Talk 04:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and New Jersey. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep References already in the article, such as "Killed in apparent drug-related shooting, Yale alumnus remembered for leadership" in The Star-Ledger and "The real Rob Peace: Family, friend talk about the brilliant mind behind N.J. movie", are examples of the extensive in-depth coverage about Peace as an individual in reliable and verifiable sources, and for that matter so is the biographical book that is clearly about him and his life. Alansohn (talk) 07:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

International Communal Studies Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No relevance. Article without notoriety and without independent or reliable sources. Alon9393 (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional and fails NCORP. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NCORP. Xegma(talk) 05:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A small charity. Can find much on them at all. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 18:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find much coverage of them at all, let along SIGCOV. EytanMelech (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2028 Northern Territory general election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Article only has one source, and it does not say anything about the election in 2028. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Australia. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Thought about a redirect but I really couldn't find a suitable target. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Northern Territory Legislative Assembly maybe? otherwise yeah delete Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Next Northern Territory general election. No point in deleting the page when it will only need to be remade again. Viatori (talk) 08:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cañapa Lake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source, not enough to meet the general notability guideline. And the source does not have the lake as its primary topic and hence is not SIGCOV. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Bolivia. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WSJP-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV, Fox affiliation notwithstanding. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Fox affiliates. No sources, no article and all but the Fox affiliation does bring in an argument they should become one with the Fox affiliation list articles. --Danubeball (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a Merge suggestion but you must provide a link to the preferred target article. Thank you.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miranda (engine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a rocket engine under development which has no proven notability as it does not yet exist. Clear case of WP:TOOSOON. As part of WP:NPP it was draftified for improvement, for instance waiting until it has proven to be viable. Novice editor removed tags, moved back to main and made comments that violate politeness code. This article and approach is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Since the editor has rejected draftification, deletion now is the approach. If the motor ever works and becomes useful, then and only then would it be appropriate for Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Spaceflight. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

N.B., this page used to be a redirect to a short description in the Firefly Aerospace page. Within that page it can be OK; however creating a new article by replacing a redirect must pass the same bar as the creation of any new page. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lean keep Unlike a lot of these fledgling companies, that end up promising a lot of vaporware, this case is likely different. This engine has the backing of Northrop Grumman, which needs it to power its Antares rocket, which it needs to lift the Cygnus spacecraft into space to resupply the International Space Station per the terms of its Commercial Resupply Services contract witch NASA. So there’s a lot riding on this program, which all adds to its notability. Furthermore, if this engine program fails, that itself may be notable if it ends the entire Antares rocket program. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While you make interesting points, I think keeping the article would also contradict Wikipedia:NOTACRYSTALBALL (I.e. Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not) since the engine is still a prototype. Let's see other opinions. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and try this at BE-4 or Raptor pages first as a precedent... KroOoOze (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a poor comparison as the BE-4 and Raptor have both flown and this engine has not. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On test\certification flights. Raptor 3 have not flown at all. In either case we rely on official informations from the companies, and things like Isp is fundamentally impossible to independently verify, and we cannot be sure with what specs they will ultimately end up with (and that is ok). Invoking CRYSTALBALL is frivolous and agaist the spirit\intention of the guideline. KroOoOze (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: but fine. What about New Glenn or Artemis II articles? By this twisted logic, should they be deleted? KroOoOze (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, however I’ll point out that this engine has completed several hot fire tests, that were shared by Northrop Grumman. So in my opinion, it’s not entirely correct to point to WP:CRYSTALBALL. This isn’t just a product announcement or rumors when they actually have a working product and a deadline to deliver that’s just months away at this point. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has many problems, but reference information being readily available ain't one of them. With consideration to how this frivolous demand was brought up, I suggest to summarily dismiss this and not waste any more of anyone's time. Whether this is inlined and put under another pointless redirection is a distinction without difference to normal people. So if anyone wants to waste his time doing this, whatever. But don't deny access to the users in the process by (soft or hard) deleting it.

|

The engine was test-fired, so it has more than sufficient physicality. People expect to find all this basic information here. I don't think there is precedent, and purging all development engines from Wikipedia is, on the face of it, bizzare idea. The template itself has a state available for whether the engine is in development or in any other stage; i.e. it is normal and expected there would be articles about engines in development.

|

The petitioner out of the blue tried to draftify the article, with complete disregard for any links to it. He tried do draftify it despite it existing more than 90 days (years in fact). Now it is clear the motivation was as a prelude to deletion. In this discussion several frivolous reasons for deletion are thrown around simply trying to see what sticks, while concern over what actually most benefits the users is not considered. Any large rocket engine is very much "notable" to people in the field as well as fans, regardless whether currently in development or not. One could claim Too_soon with maybe some concept that will be renamed two more times and doesn't have anything but the name in the first place, but hardly this engine at this stage. KroOoOze (talk) 18:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not provide incorrect information. As I clarified, the earlier page was a {{redirect}}. If it was a real page then it was not eligible for draftification. However, it was a new page and as such goes through the standard Wikipedia:New pages patrol process.

Please note the Wikipedia:Five pillars "Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility" Ldm1954 (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Firefly Aerospace per WP:NSUSTAINED, WP:FUTURE, WP:PAGEDECIDE, WP:NOTPROMO, etc etc. While a few reliable sources have briefly covered the testing of this engine, it fails WP:GNG - there is not yet enough detailed coverage to warrant a standalone article. I think this is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. This engine may well become independently notable in the future, but currently, there simply is not enough coverage to provide all but the most basic information on it. Until further SIGCOV appears, this seems better handled as a subsection of the Firefly Aerospace article. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 03:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We have arguments to Delete, Merge and one editor Leaning Keep so there is no consensus here yet. We determine notability on Wikipedia not based on editors' opinions but by coverage by reliable, secondary independent sources. Could anyone provide a further source assessment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis: There are 5 sources. 1, 2, 5 are all web articles by the manufacturer, so are not independent and (IMO) weak. Both sources 3 & 4 are from specialized science web news sites, and mainly repeat statements by the two companies, so are also weak on independence; there are no comments from independent experts. They are not from, for instance, a major national or international newspaper, and there is no comment from NASA, JPL etc experts. I do not consider that the current article has any reliable, secondary and independent sources. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the source listed in the article currently, I found the following:

Two press releases[24][25]
A paywalled article in Aviation Week [26], a reputable publication
A few short articles on niche aerospace news websites[27][28][29] of unclear reliability/independence, and one particularly shameful article[30] that just reads like an ad

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 06:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While SpaceNews isn’t a household name, Jeff Faust has become quite respected among the small cadre of full-time space journalists. He’s also probably the only one with a PhD from MIT. I’d argue he’s a reliable source.

While I don’t recognize the name of the journalist from Space.com, the site does have the green check of approval as a reliable source for Wikipedia.

-- RickyCourtney (talk) 06:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E-Z Moving

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:A7. Local company that does not meet WP:GNG and listed sources read like WP:SPONSORED. cyberdog958^Talk 06:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of South Korea, Dublin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article based on primary sources, fails WP:ORG LibStar (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, South Korea, and Ireland. LibStar (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched in the Korean language and none of what I read passes the threshold of notability. These are the closest I could find: [31][32] seefooddiet (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Taggart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. He was a member of the town board of a town with a population of 862. Grahaml35 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Population of a town should not be a factor. He deserves notoriety for being the youngest politician in Colorado history. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wiki there is basis to keep the article as it does meet standards as I created the article with enough legitimate citations showing he received tens of thousands of votes, spoke on live television and radio and holds a record in politics. @Grahaml35 @CAPTAIN RAJU. I want to make sure there is no political bias in this decision process. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - just because an individual has been on television or radio does not automatically qualify them as being notable for a Wiki article. I only mentioned the town size as a bit of information nothing more. The sources on the article and what I could find online are mostly passing mentions and lacks SIGCOV Grahaml35 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is not political bias, as this person isn't in office and editors aren't all in the US regardless. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. Based on the creator's contributions, I also strongly suspect this is a paid-for article. I have requested they declare any COI. Number 5 7 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have never been paid for my articles and I have never asked to be. @Number 57 Bobsmithian (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Small town politician, being the youngest in the state... Might be notable, but coverage is all PR items or "what is the politician" doing articles, which are not helpful. I don't find coverage, other than talking his high school/college choices. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Poland, Dublin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability concerns since December 2020. The only sources provided is its own website. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Ireland, and Poland. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of significant coverages and fails WP:NORG. Xegma(talk) 05:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Ireland–Poland_relations#Resident_diplomatic_missions. As WP:ATD-R. While the building/office/institution likely has no independent notability, there is some value (and certainly nothing inappropriate) about retaining the title. As a redirect to the article in which the topic/subject is covered. Guliolopez (talk) 09:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Shevchuk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Name gets mentioned a lot in punk zines, but as far as I'm aware, none of those are considered reliable, and he's not mentioned frequently enough outside of them to pass notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pennsylvania. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete i can see it's need more sources. Xegma(talk) 05:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge High School, New Zealand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any sigcov. Can be redirect to Cambridge, New Zealand#Education Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and New Zealand. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - If you click on any of the links on this nomination template: "Find sources: "Cambridge High School, New Zealand" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR", a whole lot of sourcing comes up to help verify Cambridge High School, New Zealand. — Maile (talk) 02:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And which of those sources are reliable, secondary, and in depth? Traumnovelle (talk) 04:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, an unnotable school lacking in sigcov. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 05:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's ridiculous to nominate a high school for deletion that's been around for 140 years. Of course it's notable; you just have to look for sources. Schwede 66 03:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many schools in New Zealand have been around for over a century and lack any SIGCOV, I couldn't even find any coverage for several recently. Traumnovelle (talk) 05:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Schwede66 and Maile. Definitely notable. TheSwamphen (talk) 03:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - while I don't have time to edit this at the moment, Papers Past has over 1000 articles referencing Cambridge High School in various national newspapers. The present article just needs updating and more information added. Definitely notable. NealeWellington (talk) 10:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above comments. Satisfies WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Yemin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yemin's name gets mentioned a lot in punk zines, but as far as I'm aware, none of those are considered reliable, and he's not mentioned frequently enough outside of them to pass notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Digital USD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable stablecoin. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. RS coverage fails WP:ORGDEPTH and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Cryptocurrencies. An independent search for RS coverage found just routine crypto-oriented articles. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Fabio Mancini

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography fails WP:GNG as it lacks WP:SUSTAINED direct and in-depth coverage. Gheus (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. models.com is WP:USERGENERATED. Polygnotus (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You'd think an Italian supermodel would have an article on it-WP. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah:[33][34] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

was deleted for no reason many years ago( you can check it here:https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Mancini_(modello)?uselang=it ) and nobody one try to open a new one. He have million of sources in Italian, but the question is, why some admin don't help to create and Italian one too? strange he have 15 different version no? just a simple question.. ;) @Polygnotus @Gråbergs Gråa Sång 151.35.228.55 (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)— 151.35.228.55 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep and Correct Hello everyone, to my opinion the article should stay and have to be correct in the wikipedia guidelines, because in the italian google he have milion of good articles and he's new life is ready to show his new book internationally today. We can help all here interested, to correct the page and took down all the sources and text who is not ok for the wiki rules. 88.45.185.68 (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)— 88.45.185.68 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
good morning everyone, can I ask you why you are deleting the page of a model who made the history of Italian fashion with one of the greatest stylists in the world? instead of deleting the article wouldn't it be better to complete it and put it in order? I study at the Marangoni University of Fashion, and Fabio Mancini is for us Italians one of the major points of reference for Italian men's fashion in the world. I think that a well-curated entry is the best solution instead of deleting it @CAPTAIN RAJU@Polygnotus@Gheus 109.52.120.95 (talk) 06:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)— 109.52.120.95 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Read WP:GNG. What are the 3 best sources you can think of that are at the same time reliably published (WP:RS), independent of the subject and about the subject in some detail? Non-English sources can be used. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
actually in all the best models wikipedia profile are covered by models.com sources - references ( have a look in Naomi Campbell references / 2nd ref one MODELS.COM! , like in David Gandy's wiki page too / ref n.9 ). So the question is.. what problem have FABIO MANCINI ? why the Italian icon can't have it, and for the other models there are NO PROBLEMS? where is equality in Wikipedia guideline rules???? @Gråbergs Gråa Sång 151.35.228.55 (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)— 151.35.228.55 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment: A couple of better-than-passing-mention hits on ProQuest:[35][36]. This [37] also mentions him, but can't access it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that the latter 2 are The Daily Telegraph (Sydney)/The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney), may not be WP:BLP-good. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something:[38][39], same text in both. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Tennis player and race driver with similar names that pop up, nothing for this person. I did enjoy meeting this hottie [40], but that doesn't help. Daily Telegraph is a RS [41], but one article isn't enough. Oaktree b (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And it's paywalled, so I can't comment how good it is, I suspect it's an interview. Oaktree b (talk) 15:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same as this one:[42] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That Daily Telegraph might be a little iffy:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_384#The_Daily_Telegraph_(Sydney) Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Help: Hello everyone, everyday you all talk in the guideline about equalize the article. Can I ask how less than 550.000 images of this person in google will be not enough to have a wiki article? Guys sorry how is possible? he did 15 years of fashion show, advertising campaign in all the major billboards the world with GIORGIO ARMANI, and his totally an ICON in Italy and in the fashion industry of all the world???? How is possible Pietro Boselli who is a very cheap model in Italy have a wiki page in English? and did 2% of Mancini's Career? I think you have to check his socials (personal instagram with more than 360K and Facebook with less than 150K people all over the world ) to understand how is an icon for the fashion industry. Try to search Fabio Mancini-Giorgio Armani in google and you'll see what I'm trying to explain. Thank you all for the patience @Oaktree b @Gheus@Gråbergs Gråa Sång@CAPTAIN RAJU 151.35.228.55 (talk) 17:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)— 151.35.228.55 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete per above. Fails GNG. C F A 💬 20:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from talkpage by Polygnotus (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct & help Fabio Mancini is an internationally renowned model and his experience in my opinion deserves to be spread. he is a boy with values who can be an example for the new generations. the page could be corrected without deleting it. what do you think? Iolanda.chinellato (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)— Iolanda.chinellato (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
~~Keep/~~Agree: I totally agree with you @Iolanda.chinellato We can help the community here to get a better page, because have no sense delete a page of a supermodel who everyone know in Italy and in the international fashion world. Make no sense. With the right article (I dont think he need 200 articles to prove is notoriety,just a few to have a good page, maybe little, but with the right informations will works). 88.45.185.68 (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)— 88.45.185.68 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete fails WP:SUSTAINED and WP:ANYBIO; WP:SALTING is very much an option at this stage. SerialNumber54129 13:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient WP:DEPTH of coverage from reliable sources. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chimele Usuwa Abengowe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Firstly, the content on ref 1 which is a magazine can't be verified by any reliable source same as ref 5. Ref 2 and ref 5 are also the same link on the article current state. The only source here was this which just only talk about his death. Ref 7 which is a YouTube video showcasing a church service cant be use as a source neither any YouTube link can be use as a source. Ref 3 which just only mentioned his name as part of the medical list and not like he was talked about. Subject just totally fails WP:GNG. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Nigeria. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly a much respected citizen but WP:NOTMEMORIAL Xxanthippe (talk) 01:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]
thank you for your response. Please note that @Gabriel601 has been trolling my articles and marking them for deletion. There's an established case of "nominations in bad faith here". Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

welcome again for marking another article of mine for deletion. After the last episode, you should have recused yourself from my articles and leave other editors to go through and arrive at their own conclusions. Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't verify certain details about this person like the date of birth and death. My search for the various information yielded "result not found" and I was wondering about the origin of other information like the award, OFR. After all these, I can say that the article doesn't meet WP:NPROF and WP:SIGCOV. Also, Gabriel's source analysis is thorough and well-documented. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Due to being a recipient of one of Nigeria's highest national awards (WP:ANYBIO The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor) National Honour of Member of the Order of the Niger (OON) by President Olusegun Obasanjo on the 16th November, 2000 - now sourced to Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette. (Msrasnw (talk) 09:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]
The link you provided still doesn’t have his name on it that the president honors him with the title of OON. I opened the link used the control+F to find and paste his name still zero not found. Subject still fails WP:GNG. Gabriel (……?) 10:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It has on page 605 as the third entry.... under the heading OFFICER OF THE ORDER OF THE NIGER (OON) Professor C. U. Abengowe ... Abia
  - https://archive.gazettes.africa/archive/ng/2000/ng-government-gazette-dated-2000-10-09-no-69.pdf Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Brenda Schad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG for not having significant coverage from independent, reliable sources. COI history doesn't help either. Gheus (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: From the article: "Brenda and Jeannine McCann co-founded the company Tribe of Two". So all those references are primary sources, too. _signed,Willondon (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan, France, Italy, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Ghazali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG for not having significant coverage from independent, reliable source for verification. One Champion is not reliable and indepdent source as this is the combat promotion company where the subject is under contract. www.iloveborneo, www.iluminasi and https://www.sportskeeda all are not reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Malaysia. Cassiopeia talk 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete need more significant coverages and also "Personal life" section is unsourced. Xegma(talk) 04:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, and unsourced section and fails WP:GNG. Lekkha Moun (talk) 12:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My search found no significant independent coverage of him that I think meets WP:GNG. As for meeting any SNG, he's not even ranked by the promotion he's fighting in, much less in the world. His family connections do not add to his WP notability (WP:NOTINHERITED). He may become notable, but right now that requires a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Papaursa (talk) 20:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crabtree Brewing Co.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. The first source is a blog. 2nd is not sigcov and third is very local coverage as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Colorado. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV and unsourced sections. Xegma(talk) 05:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP for not having significant coverage of independent, reliable sources for verification. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Airnav.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV and there is no clear reason why this is a notable website. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article itself has no reference. I cannot find any sources talk about it, only WP:PASSINGMENTIONS Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It is very heavily cited (see Google books, Google scholar). There is a page of coverage here and a paragraph of coverage here. I imagine there is more so I suggest participants take a good look at Google books for significant coverage. C F A 💬 02:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a fixed Google books link. tedder (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, while CFA didn't cast a "vote" in this discussion, they have brought sources to the discussion which should be reviewed. Soft deletion doesn't seem appropriate as deletion is no longer "uncontroversial".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's hardly more than a passing mention to be found (who runs it? etc), but wow, the quantity of mentions in articles, journals, and websites is - in this case - informative. tedder (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presbyterian Church in Korea (BoSuHapDong III.)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A follow-up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korea Jesus Presbyterian Church with a single page nominated rather than a bundle.

Bosu Hapdong (Korean: 보수합동) translates as "Conservative Union". The only source is a database of Church denominations, which "did not manage to contact this church". This is insufficient sourcing to keep this as an article.

Furthermore, the title is mangled with an unnecessary . character, and the Roman Numeral may be an invention of reformiert-online. Korean Wikipedia does not have an article on this; a cursory search in Korean did not find an immediate result for (or about) any group of this name.

For a potential redirect, it is unclear what the target would be: Presbyterian Church of Korea, Presbyterianism in South Korea, or a new page. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and South Korea. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Presbyterianism in South Korea. seefooddiet (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bandial railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no claim to notability, and no sources. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and no sources. Xegma(talk) 05:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of railway stations in Pakistan for now. Colonial era station, likely notable. Someone with access to local library may find good amount of coverage. Gheus (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per the above. No justification for deleting a highly plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Morse

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable congressional candidate and state government official. Page previously created and deleted back in 2018 (though that was before her state government service). Of the 24 sources cited on the page: 5 are WP:ROTM coverage of her campaigns, 3 are press releases, 6 are articles about wildfires that quotes her a few times, 3 only mention her in passing, 2 are pages on government websites, 2 are recordings of state legislative committee hearings, 1 doesn't even mention her at all, and only 3 are actual in-depth interviews or profiles with local outlets. Someone is not inherently notable just because they ran for Congress and held a relatively minor position in state government, and the coverage I'm seeing here doesn't convince me that she meets GNG. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. You're right that running by itself does not make one notable. However, she's still notable for her work regarding wildfires which came after the page was deleted originally, and as I see it she definitely meets GNG. First there's this Sacramento Bee story, which despite being "local" as you say, is still 27th largest paper in the U.S., so it's not exactly a small town paper. This is also, though local, still notable enough to help with GNG I think. Then of course there's this profile which is not local at all. There are also things like this, which while they aren't profiles, are more than just passing mentions or quotes, and treat her as notable. If that wasn't enough though I've found a few other things as well via a quick Google search: this 2022 interview on KQED (second half turns into an interview of her background and life after talking about wildfires), this is a Dailykos profile, which although about the election still goes into detail about her; and finally here is another Sac Bee story, this one on her getting the Deputy Secretary job. There's more, but I think with the things I've already mentioned she safely passes GNG. Relinus (talk) 02:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is not her first run for office, and most likely will not be her last. What makes her notable, are her public services, within California as well as on a national level. — Maile (talk) 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep: This could cause a snow in Pakistan. Best, (non-admin closure) Reading Beans 15:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a member of the Provincial Assembly has nothing to do with being Notable especially when theres zero significant coverage of the subject neither sources to proof notability. Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians. Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 04:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly passes NPOL — Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have to state a reason why it clearly passes NPOL and where did the NPOL says without a significant coverage or sources rather than the 2 source of just being mention as a member on the article, a public figure of a person is to have a Wikipedia page. Gabriel (……?) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NPOL as an elected member of a provincial legislature. -- Whpq (talk) 04:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:NPOL stated Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline. Should we now all start writing about politicians all because they got elected for a common provincial not even a governor of a state or a president of a country without meeting the WP:GNG? Gabriel (……?) 10:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It clearly follows the policy. :Crosji (talk) 10:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: This is a clear-cut WP:NSUBPOL pass. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay just seeing this. Gabriel (……?) 11:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Iranian American Women Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Isn't a notable organization. jwtmsqeh (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There appears to be sources for this organization including the LA Times, Santa Monica Daily Press, an interview with a local radio station, and a doctoral dissertation. I'll add them to the article a bit later tonight or tomorrow, just wanted to put them here for anyone else to evaluate etc. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Santa Monica Daily Press seems like a press release? The LA Times is actually a localized sub paper, not sure if that or the local radio is considered since Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) specifies that articles "solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town), or media of limited interest and circulation (e.g., a newsletter exclusively for people with a very unusual job), is not an indication of notability". Also, the article is about an event but the same guideline says "an organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it". Happy to withdraw this if I'm misreading though. jwtmsqeh (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support As per the wiki notability principle I don't think this article fulfil the minimal criteria prior to Subject Consideration possible reason fair enough भारतसरकार-विभाग (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] HST page for this object

[1]