Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today
See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.
Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.
How to use this page
[edit]- Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
- Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
- Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
- Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
- Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
- Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
- If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
- Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
- Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
- Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
- Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
- Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.
Special notes
[edit]Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.
Discussion for Today
[edit]- This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024_December_9
December 9
[edit]NEW NOMINATIONS
[edit]Category:Portal-Class Comics articles of NA-importance
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: All these pages are already in the categories "Portal-Class Comics articles" and "NA-importance Comics articles", ideally they should only be in "Portal-Class Comics articles", which should be a member of "NA-importance Comics articles", and this redundant category can simply be deleted. Fram (talk) 09:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Presumably some technical solution for this needs to be found, but when it is implemented, it can also be applied to other types of pages which are always NA, i.e. every page in all subcategories of Category:NA-importance Comics articles except the actual articles cats (stub, start, C, GA, ...) should be removed from "... articles of NA-importance" and "NA-importance comics articles". As an example, Talk:10th Muse is now in three cats, it should only remain in "Redirect-Class Comics articles", and that cat should get "NA-importance comics articles". Simplify by removing redundancy. But I guess this belong at the Village pump, as this seems to happen with some other projects as well, and is presumably too much for the scope of CfD? Fram (talk) 09:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:1st century BC in Judea
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: delete, isolated category with one subcategory only. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, category has now 4 entries. Fram (talk) 10:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:English High School of Boston alumni
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:English High School of Boston alumni to Category:The English High School alumni
- Nominator's rationale: The corresponding article for this category is titled The English High School. That article also says that it is "[c]ommonly referred to as Boston English." "English High School of Boston" should not be an option for the name of this category. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 03:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- It may be a better idea
to rename the article to Boston English and have the category renamed to Category:Boston English alumni.Marcocapelle (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe not such a great idea after all. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose renaming to Category:The English High School alumni. Whatever the title of the article, it is likely that some users would be confused by that, thinking that it refers to high schools in England, or to some other school known as "The English High School", such as the one in Lynn, Massachusetts, or the one in Providence, Rhode Island, or the one in Nişantaşı, Turkey (now renamed). A far better idea is to rename the article on the school to make its identity clear, to something such as "The English High School, Boston". I don't like the idea of renaming it to "Boston English"; certainly that would not be desirable unless it can be shown that that is by a significant margin the commonest name used for the school, and even then I wouldn't support it, because to most people that would mean the variety of the English language spoken in Boston. JBW (talk) 13:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on JBW's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Ancient Hinduism
[edit]- Propose deleting Category:8th-century BC Hinduism (1 C)
- Propose deleting Category:7th-century BC Hinduism (1 C)
- Propose deleting Category:6th-century BC Hinduism (1 C)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory each. Merging is not necessary, the subcategories are already in e.g. Category:8th-century BC people by religion. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Mythological Greek epic poets
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Mythological Greek epic poets to Category:Fictional poets
- Nominator's rationale: merge, only two articles in the category, this is not helpful for navigation. Skipping parent Category:Fictional oral poets as a merge target because this has been nominated too. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Mythology is not the same as fiction, and these already seem to be in other subcategories of Category:Characters in Greek mythology by occupation anyway. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:46, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- That is a fair point. Deletion is better indeed. The articles are already in Category:Musicians in Greek mythology. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Mythology should not be confused with fiction as there is not the same intent regarding truthful cosmological beliefs versus fiction made for entertainment. Jontesta (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Rename to "Category:Mythological Greek poets", and include other notable figures who would fit such a grouping, such as Orpheus and Musaeus of Athens. Being a poet is undoubtedly defining for each of these figures (more defining than being a mythological musician, except perhaps for Orpheus). Having a category covering legendary poets in Greek mythology seems entirely sensible. – Michael Aurel (talk) 08:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- If more articles can be added after renaming then let's do that. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Should this category be renamed/repurposed? If so, can we add enough articles to it?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: See above relisting comment
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:627 BC establishments
[edit]- Propose merging Category:627 BC establishments to Category:627 BC
- Propose merging Category:626 BC establishments to Category:626 BC
- Nominator's rationale: merge, isolated single-article categories, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose putting Neo-Babylonian Empire into Category:626 BC seems less helpful for navigation either from Category to article or vice versa. The connection between them is opaque. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnestorius (talk • contribs) 16:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- That is how it is done with other year establishments in these ancient times too. Hence these two categories are isolated. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- More useful and logical to upmerge to Category:620s BC establishments. jnestorius(talk) 11:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Establishments categories by decade start after 400 BC and the two articles in the nominated category are already in an establishment category by century. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Marcocapelle's most recent comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)- @Jnestorius: Thoughts? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If
That is how it is done with other year establishments
represents the result of a considered discussion then please link to that discussion. If it is just a de-facto standard that evolved without consideration then I suggest starting a full discussion rather than blindly conforming to a partial consistency. I say "partial" because e.g. Category:620s BC deaths and Category:600s BC births have plenty of one-article categories. Upmerging Category:607 BC births and Category:607 BC deaths to Category:607 BC is unhelpful because you can't tell whether for a given article the category relates to the year the person was born or died (or perhaps some other important life event happened). I am making a similar argument for things other than humans. jnestorius(talk) 12:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If
Category:Fictional contortionists
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Fictional contortionists to Category:Fictional circus performers
- Nominator's rationale: Too small a category to be merited, with only a couple characters as members. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure if any of the articles should be in Category:Fictional circus performers. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Marcocapelle's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Too niche to be a clear and meaningful category. Merge it to something broader and clearer. Jontesta (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still need a response to Marcocapelle's question: should the category be merged or deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If no other response, the merge should be done manually. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Alumni of Coleg Cambria
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Category containing no articles. Category:Alumni of Yale College, Wrexham has been made a sub-category despite the fact that Yale College Wrexham is now defunct and the two alumni in the category graduated from it when it was not part of Coleg Cambria. This extra layer of categorisation is inaccurate and makes absolutely no sense. AusLondonder (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is now an article and a category (the one that you removed, AusLondonder) in this nominated category, so it is no longer an empty category. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yep that's why I took it to CSD instead of speedy. The article wasn't there at that point, though. AusLondonder (talk) 08:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, since found things that can go in it, one article that attended when it became Coleg Cambria, and sub-cats to the predecessors. Do understand that before these edits the category was empty for years. DankJae 10:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One article and a subcategory as of relisting; is that enough to keep the category?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I guess this is moot. There are now four articles in it. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:People prosecuted under anti-homosexuality laws
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: rename (and purge if needed), we categorize by people by conviction, not by prosecution. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Conviction rather than prosecution is generally appropriate for crime-related categories, but here the broader scope is appropriate. Interest in the category is more likely to relate to identifying individuals who were persecuted rather than guilty. This is a subcategory of Category:Victims of human rights abuses, and those victims include individuals who were prosecuted but not convicted on the basis of sexual orientation.--Trystan (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Trystan's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Indian Paintbrush (company) films
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Indian Paintbrush (company) films to Category:Indian Paintbrush films
- Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary disambiguation. No other category with "indian paintbrush" currently exists and even if they did, "films" exists as a natural disambiguator. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is the wrong order. First article Indian Paintbrush (company) should be renamed, thereafter this category can follow. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Marcocapelle's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:People associated with Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Vague and unnecessary. WP:ASSOCIATEDWITH concerns. For most entires, won't be WP:CATDEF meamemg (talk) 23:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, textbook case of WP:OCASSOC. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is how the lawyer/company intersection categories have historically been formed, see Category:People by law firm in the United States. If there is a problem with the nominated category, other categories in this parent category should be examined as well. Clay (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seems to be an association by company. Dimadick (talk) 15:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Clay's and Dimadick's comments?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- If kept, rename to Category:Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie people which is the default for people by company, per Dimadick. But still it is mostly a case of WP:PERFCAT and WP:NONDEF. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Buddhist cave temples
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Buddhist cave temples in Andhra Pradesh to Category:Buddhist caves in Andhra Pradesh
- Propose renaming Category:Buddhist cave temples in Gujarat to Category:Buddhist caves in Gujarat
- Propose renaming Category:Buddhist cave temples in Madhya Pradesh to Category:Buddhist caves in Madhya Pradesh
- Propose renaming Category:Buddhist cave temples in Maharashtra to Category:Buddhist caves in Maharashtra
- Nominator's rationale: rename follow-up on this previous discussion and aligning with parent category name. @Kingsmasher678 and Johnbod: pinging contributors to previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support rename, but oppose this target. Something to clarify that these are manmade would be nice, because these features are almost exclusively rock-cut architecture not caves. In fact, I think I only saw one natural cave in the whole bunch when I was sorting them by state. That was the original idea I had when I named to cats, though it missed the mark!
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Best solution so far. You can't always tell whether a large excavation began as a natural cave or not. Johnbod (talk) 23:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am trying to go through the cave categories right now and these are practically the only group of human structures called caves in the entire tree. It's also kind of irrelevant if it started natural, because it sure isn't now, and would therefore be rock-cut.
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:29, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I can see you find it annoying that the standard term is caves, but it just is. The forms found in India typically fall into two main types, often both represented at large sites like the Ajanta Caves, viharas, the most numerous, which can't be called temples, and chaityas, which generally can. So "caves" is used as a group term. Johnbod (talk) 02:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- I’m not arguing for the current names, I’m arguing that they should be clarified to be rock cut or at least indicated that they aren’t natural, because in the caves tree, nearly everything is natural. It’s an important distinction. I mean, we literally have an article about the correct term. I’m not trying to call them temples, as I have been told that isn’t right. Sorry if there was some confusion.
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also, both of those article you linked called the structures temple, just so you know.
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- I can see you find it annoying that the standard term is caves, but it just is. The forms found in India typically fall into two main types, often both represented at large sites like the Ajanta Caves, viharas, the most numerous, which can't be called temples, and chaityas, which generally can. So "caves" is used as a group term. Johnbod (talk) 02:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename target still needs sorting out.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)- @Kingsmasher678, Marcocapelle, and Johnbod: See above relisting comment. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Biodiversity Heritage Library Enthusiasts
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: WP:OC/U#irrelevant likes. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- I somewhat disagree, as the Biodiversity Library is quite a resource for Wikipedia/Wikimedia commons, so relevant to to encyclopedia-building. TiagoLubiana (talk) 10:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on TiagoLubiana's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Scientists from Plano, Texas
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Scientists from Plano, Texas to Category:People from Plano, Texas
- Nominator's rationale: Category with two entries. Also upmerge entries to Scientists from Texas, Lost in Quebec (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Probably single merge to Category:People from Plano, Texas, these people were just born in Texas, not scientists in Texas. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Added more people to the category. Dick Haugland was a scientist in Plano. Flurrious (talk) 23:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Marcocapelle's and Flurrious's comments?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cat now has 6 entries. LibStar (talk) 01:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is six enough to keep the category?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I guess this is moot now. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:People executed by the United States federal government by lethal injection
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category that duplicates Category:21st-century executions by the United States federal government. All 16 entries are in that category and vice versa. Lost in Quebec (talk) 22:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Don't know. The articles of this category should still be part of the tree of Category:People executed by the United States by lethal injection, right? Marcocapelle (talk) 05:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Marcocapelle's comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: See above relisting comment
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)- @Lost in Quebec: Thoughts? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:13th-century French physicists
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Isolated category, upmerge for now. SMasonGarrison 01:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)