Talk:John 20
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the May 2005 deletion debate on this article, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/John 20.
I do think keeping the full text is useful. One of the complaints at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/John 20:16 was that going verse by verse presented each one with too little context, something that is partially remedied by having the entire chapter one click away. - SimonP 14:56, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
POV
[edit]POV issues of this article is discussed at another in the series. See Talk:Matthew 1 ~~~~ 20:16, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
- Um, I don't see a discussion about POV there. JYolkowski // talk 20:18, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
survey
[edit]For a (now finished) July 2005 survey about whether or not the full source text should be included in the article see Wikipedia:Bible source text.
There were 36 non-abstaining votes, and 3 abstensions.
The result of the survey was a 70% vote that it should not be included in the text, and should be removed in favour of a link to the text at wikisource. ~~~~ 07:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Merged without discussion
[edit]Please don't try merging this without discussion. Merging Bible articles has been very contraversial - and whilst there is some support for merging verse articles, there is none for chapter articles. If this article is merges, it should be into an article on a longer section of the gospel of John, as that is what this is part of. Attempts to delete this and other chapter articles have failed - and demonstrated a clear consensus to keep. Merging contraversial articles without discussion is bordering on disruption. --Doc ask? 13:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the John 20 page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "John 20" page.